World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John F. Burkhart

John F. Burkhart

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
8942
World Ranking
6028
National Ranking
71

John F. Burkhart publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Burkhart sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 133 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John F. Burkhart D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John F. Burkhart sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

John F. Burkhart is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, and Geology.

Their work covers multiple research topics related to hydrology and environmental monitoring. These topics include:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Climate variability and models
  • Environmental Monitoring and Data Management

Recent publications by John F. Burkhart include the following papers:

  • "Shyft v4.8: a framework for uncertainty assessment and distributed hydrologic modeling for operational hydrology", 2021, Geoscientific model development
  • "A new approach to meteorological observations on remote polar glaciers using open-source internet of things technologies", 2023, Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • "Evaluation of global forcing datasets for hydropower inflow simulation in Nepal", 2020, Hydrology research
  • "Improving hydropower inflow forecasts by assimilating snow data", 2020, Hydrology research
  • "Coupled machine learning and the limits of acceptability approach applied in parameter identification for a distributed hydrological model", 2020, Hydrology and earth system sciences

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Burkhart include Felix Matt, Aynom T. Teweldebrhan, Thomas V. Schuler, Bikas Chandra Bhattarai, and Sigbjørn Helset.

John F. Burkhart's research has been published in several venues, notably:

  • Hydrology research
  • Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Water

Best Publications

  • Xenon-133 and caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant: determination of the source term, atmospheric dispersion, and deposition

    Andreas Stohl;P. Seibert;G Wotawa;D. Arnold;D. Arnold

  • Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident

    Teppei J. Yasunari;Andreas Stohl;Ryugo S. Hayano;John Faulkner Burkhart

  • The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 10.4

    Ignacio Pisso;Espen Sollum;Henrik Grythe;Nina Iren Kristiansen;Nina Iren Kristiansen

  • Arctic smoke – record high air pollution levels in the European Arctic due to agricultural fires in Eastern Europe in spring 2006

    A. Stohl;T. Berg;T. Berg;J. F. Burkhart;J. F. Burkhart;A. M. Fjǽraa

  • General overview: European Integrated project on Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality interactions (EUCAARI) - integrating aerosol research from nano to global scales

    M. Kulmala;A. Asmi;H. K. Lappalainen;H. K. Lappalainen;U. Baltensperger

  • The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART-WRF version 3.1

    J Brioude;J Brioude;D Arnold;D Arnold;Andreas Stohl;Massimo Cassiani

  • Pan-Arctic enhancements of light absorbing aerosol concentrations due to North American boreal forest fires during summer 2004

    A. Stohl;E. Andrews;E. Andrews;J. F. Burkhart;C. Forster

  • Source identification of short-lived air pollutants in the Arctic using statistical analysis of measurement data and particle dispersion model output

    David Arne Hirdman;Harald Sodemann;Sabine Eckhardt;John Faulkner Burkhart

  • Weakening temperature control on the interannual variations of spring carbon uptake across northern lands

    Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Zhuo Liu;Tao Wang;Shushi Peng

  • Pan-Arctic enhancement of light absorbing aerosol concentration due to North American boreal forest fires during summer 2004

    A. Stohl;E. Andrews;J. F. Burkhart;C. Forster

  • Long-term trends of black carbon and sulphate aerosol in the Arctic: changes in atmospheric transport and source region emissions

    David Arne Hirdman;John Faulkner Burkhart;Harald Sodemann;Sabine Eckhardt

  • Annual accumulation for Greenland updated using ice core data developed during 2000--2006 and analysis of daily coastal meteorological data

    Roger C. Bales;Qinghua Guo;Dayong Shen;Joseph R. McConnell

  • Fossil versus contemporary sources of fine elemental and organic carbonaceous particulate matter during the DAURE campaign in Northeast Spain

    M. C. Minguillón;M. C. Minguillón;N. Perron;N. Perron;X. Querol;S. Szidat;S. Szidat

  • Aerosol composition and sources in the central Arctic Ocean during ASCOS

    R. Y.-W. Chang;C. Leck;M. Graus;M. Graus;M Müller;M Müller

  • Arctic Air Pollution: New Insights from POLARCAT-IPY

    Katharine S. Law;Andreas Stohl;Patricia K. Quinn;Charles A. Brock

  • Source apportionment of the summer time carbonaceous aerosol at Nordic rural background sites

    K. E. Yttri;D. Simpson;D. Simpson;J. K. Nojgaard;K. Kristensen

  • Measurements of Atmospheric Aerosol Vertical Distributions above Svalbard, Norway using Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)

    Timothy S. Bates;Patricia K. Quinn;James E. Johnson;Andrew Corless

  • Aerosol particle measurements at three stationary sites in the megacity of Paris during summer 2009: meteorology and air mass origin dominate aerosol particle composition and size distribution

    Friederike Freutel;Jodi Schneider;F. Drewnick;S.-L. von der Weiden-Reinmüller

  • Ozone variability and halogen oxidation within the Arctic and sub-Arctic springtime boundary layer

    J. B. Gilman;J. B. Gilman;J. F. Burkhart;B. M. Lerner;B. M. Lerner;E. J. Williams;E. J. Williams

  • Observations of hydroxyl and the sum of peroxy radicals at Summit, Greenland during summer 2003

    S.J. Sjostedt;L.G. Huey;D.J. Tanner;J. Peischl;J. Peischl

  • Synchronous volcanic eruptions and abrupt climate change ∼17.7 ka plausibly linked by stratospheric ozone depletion

    Joseph R. McConnell;Andrea Burke;Nelia W. Dunbar;Peter Köhler

  • Weakening temperature control on the interannual variations of spring carbon uptake across northern lands

    S. Piao;S. Peng;Z. Liu;P. Ciais

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Stohl
Andreas Stohl University of Vienna
Manuel A. Hutterli
Manuel A. Hutterli British Antarctic Survey
Roger C. Bales
Roger C. Bales University of California, Merced
Joseph R. McConnell
Joseph R. McConnell Desert Research Institute
Sabine Eckhardt
Sabine Eckhardt Norwegian Institute for Air Research
Markus M. Frey
Markus M. Frey British Antarctic Survey
Petra Seibert
Petra Seibert BOKU University
Spyros N. Pandis
Spyros N. Pandis University of Patras
Jack E. Dibb
Jack E. Dibb University of New Hampshire
Lena M. Tallaksen
Lena M. Tallaksen University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields through online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Programs such as online sociology bachelor programs provide valuable insights into social behaviors and community dynamics, which are essential when addressing environmental challenges.

Those seeking advanced credentials might consider accelerated paths like 1 year phd programs online no dissertation. These programs offer efficient routes to doctoral degrees, beneficial for professionals aiming to advance their expertise without extended research commitments.

This option is bolstered by institutions featured in lists such as online eds to edd programs, which support educators and researchers seeking seamless progression from a master's level EdS to a doctoral EdD. Such pathways are ideal for those focused on leadership roles within environmental policy or education sectors.

Additionally, aspiring social workers interested in environmental justice might explore fully funded dsw programs. These programs combine social work expertise with environmental advocacy, preparing graduates for impactful careers addressing community health and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing John F. Burkhart

Trending Scientists