World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
6572
World Ranking
8052
National Ranking
608

Markus M. Frey publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus M. Frey sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 117 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Markus M. Frey D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus M. Frey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus M. Frey is affiliated with the British Antarctic Survey in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their research primarily focuses on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, with additional work in Biophysics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Media Technology.

Their work encompasses several key topics including:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds

Markus M. Frey has published in a range of scientific venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Faraday Discussions
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Several recent publications include the following:

  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Atmosphere (2022), Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition: Snow and sea ice (2022), Elementa Science of the Anthropocene
  • First direct observation of sea salt aerosol production from blowing snow above sea ice (2020), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Implementation and Impacts of Surface and Blowing Snow Sources of Arctic Bromine Activation Within WRF-Chem 4.1.1 (2021), Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Snow Property Controls on Modeled Ku-Band Altimeter Estimates of First-Year Sea Ice Thickness: Case Studies From the Canadian and Norwegian Arctic (2020), IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Markus M. Frey include:

  • Joël Savarino
  • Julia Schmale
  • Xin Yang
  • Matthew D. Shupe
  • Jessie M. Creamean

The breadth of study areas and topics indicates a multidisciplinary effort centered on atmospheric processes and cryospheric interactions, particularly in polar and Arctic environments. Their research integrates observational data and modeling approaches to better understand atmospheric chemistry, aerosol dynamics, and ice-related phenomena in changing climates.

Best Publications

  • An overview of snow photochemistry: evidence, mechanisms and impacts

    A. M. Grannas;A. E. Jones;J. Dibb;M. Ammann

  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition—Atmosphere

    Unknown

  • Snowfall-driven growth in East Antarctic ice sheet mitigates recent sea-level rise.

    Curt H. Davis;Yonghong Li;Joseph R. McConnell;Markus M. Frey

  • Overview of the MOSAiC expedition

    Unknown

  • A review of air-ice chemical and physical interactions (AICI): liquids, quasi-liquids, and solids in snow

    T. Bartels-Rausch;H.-W. Jacobi;H.-W. Jacobi;T. F. Kahan;J. L. Thomas;J. L. Thomas

  • Hydrograph separations in a mesoscale mountainous basin at event and seasonal timescales

    Stefan Uhlenbrook;Markus Frey;Christian Leibundgut;Piotr Maloszewski

  • Tracing the origin and fate of NOx in the Arctic atmosphere using stable isotopes in nitrate.

    Samuel Morin;Samuel Morin;Joël Savarino;Joël Savarino;Markus M. Frey;Markus M. Frey;Nicolas Yan;Nicolas Yan

  • Comprehensive isotopic composition of atmospheric nitrate in the Atlantic Ocean boundary layer from 65°S to 79°N

    Samuel Morin;Joël Savarino;Markus M. Frey;Markus M. Frey;Florent Domine

  • Photolysis imprint in the nitrate stable isotope signal in snow and atmosphere of East Antarctica and implications for reactive nitrogen cycling

    Markus M. Frey;Markus M. Frey;J. Savarino;S. Morin;S. Morin;J. Erbland

  • The Carrington Event not observed in most ice core nitrate records

    E W Wolff;M Bigler;M. A. J Curran;M. A. J Curran;Jack E. Dibb

  • Impacts of snowpack emissions on deduced levels of OH and peroxy radicals at Summit, Greenland

    J Yang;R E Honrath;Matthew C Peterson;Jack E. Dibb

  • First direct observation of sea salt aerosol production from blowing snow above sea ice

    Markus M. Frey;Sarah J. Norris;Ian M. Brooks;Philip S. Anderson

  • Snow chemistry across Antarctica

    N. Bertler;P.A. Mayewski;A. Aristarain;P. Barrett

  • Air–snow transfer of nitrate on the East Antarctic Plateau – Part 1: Isotopic evidence for a photolytically driven dynamic equilibrium in summer

    J. Erbland;W. C. Vicars;J. Savarino;S. Morin

  • Measurements of hydrogen peroxide and formaldehyde exchange between the atmosphere and surface snow at Summit, Greenland

    Hans-Werner Jacobi;Markus M. Frey;Manuel A. Hutterli;Roger C. Bales

  • Greenland records of aerosol source and atmospheric lifetime changes from the Eemian to the Holocene.

    Simon Schüpbach;Hubertus Fischer;M. Bigler;Tobias Erhardt

  • Snow optical properties at Dome C (Concordia), Antarctica; implications for snow emissions and snow chemistry of reactive nitrogen

    M. D. King;M. M. Frey;Joseph Erbland

  • Spatial and temporal variability in snow accumulation at the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Divide over recent centuries

    J. Ryan Banta;Joseph R. McConnell;Markus M. Frey;Markus M. Frey;Roger C. Bales

  • Implementation and impacts of surface and blowing snow sources of Arctic bromine activation within WRF-Chem 4.1.1

    Louis Marelle;Jennie L. Thomas;Shaddy Ahmed;Katie Tuite

  • Atmospheric hydroperoxides in West Antarctica: Links to stratospheric ozone and atmospheric oxidation capacity

    Markus M. Frey;Markus M. Frey;Richard W. Stewart;Joseph R. McConnell;Roger C. Bales

  • The International Trans-Antarctic Scientific Expedition (ITASE): an overview

    Paul Andrew Mayewski;Massimo Frezzotti;Nancy A.N. Bertler;Tas van Ommen

  • High-resolution ice cores from US ITASE (West Antarctica): development and validation of chronologies and determination of precision and accuracy

    Eric J. Steig;Paul Andrew Mayewski;Daniel A. Dixon;Susan D. Kaspari

  • The diurnal variability of atmospheric nitrogen oxides (NO and NO 2 ) above the Antarctic Plateau driven by atmospheric stability and snow emissions

    M. M. Frey;N. Brough;P. S. Anderson;P. S. Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Joel Savarino
Joel Savarino Grenoble Alpes University
Roger C. Bales
Roger C. Bales University of California, Merced
Anna E. Jones
Anna E. Jones British Antarctic Survey
Eric W. Wolff
Eric W. Wolff University of Cambridge
Hans-Werner Jacobi
Hans-Werner Jacobi Grenoble Alpes University
Manuel A. Hutterli
Manuel A. Hutterli British Antarctic Survey
Susanne Preunkert
Susanne Preunkert Grenoble Alpes University
Joseph R. McConnell
Joseph R. McConnell Desert Research Institute
Jennie L. Thomas
Jennie L. Thomas Grenoble Alpes University
Florent Domine
Florent Domine Université Laval

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various career opportunities focused on sustainability, conservation, and policy-making. For those interested in expanding their expertise, exploring the best eds to edd programs can provide advanced educational leadership skills that benefit environmental education and advocacy roles.

Social work also plays a critical role in environmental justice, making an online dsw programs in social work a valuable option for those looking to address community and social challenges linked to environmental issues.

For students seeking a flexible approach to education, affordable and broad qualifications like the low cost online general studies degree offer customizable curricula that include environmental subjects alongside other disciplines.

Additionally, some may prefer starting with easy bachelor degrees to build foundational knowledge before specializing in environmental science fields, making higher education more accessible and manageable.

Best Scientists Citing Markus M. Frey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles