World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
7835
World Ranking
5825
National Ranking
2121

David E. Armstrong publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Armstrong sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 122 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

David E. Armstrong D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Armstrong sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

David E. Armstrong is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their academic work is connected to this institution, which serves as the primary affiliation for their research activities.

There are no recent papers listed for David E. Armstrong, and no frequent co-authors or publication venues are documented in the available data.

No book publications or awards have been recorded for this researcher. Additionally, there is no information available regarding specific fields or subfields of study, main topics of work, or citation counts related to their research output.

David E. Armstrong is currently alive, and the profile reflects ongoing active status with no dated cessation of work or career.

Best Publications

  • Factors affecting phosphorus release from intact lake sediment cores

    G. C. Holdren;David E. Armstrong

  • Phosphate Chemistry in Lake Sediments

    J. K. Syers;R. F. Harris;D. E. Armstrong

  • Fractionation of Inorganic Phosphate in Calcareous Lake Sediments1

    J. D. H. Williams;J. K. Syers;R. F. Harris;D. E. Armstrong

  • Bioavailability of Phosphorus Inputs to Lakes 1

    Unknown

  • Atrazine Hydrolysis in Soil 1

    Unknown

  • The influence of dissolved organic carbon, suspended particulates, and hydrology on the concentration, partitioning and variability of trace metals in two contrasting Wisconsin watersheds (U.S.A.)

    Martin M. Shafer;Joel T. Overdier;James P. Hurley;James P. Hurley;David Armstrong

  • Role of nutrient limitation and competition in controlling the populations of Asterionella formosa and Microcystis aeruginosa in semicontinuous culture1

    Nancy Peterson Holm;David E. Armstrong

  • Levels of inorganic and total phosphorus in lake sediments as related to other sediment parameters

    Julian D. H. Williams;John K. Syers;Surendra S. Shukla;Robin F. Harris

  • Partitioning of Total Mercury and Methylmercury to the Colloidal Phase in Freshwaters

    Christopher L. Babiarz;James P. Hurley;Stephen R. Hoffmann;Anders W. Andren

  • Factors affecting enhanced mercury bioaccumulation in inland lakes of Isle Royale National Park, USA.

    Patrick R Gorski;Lisa B Cleckner;James P Hurley;James P Hurley;Michael E Sierszen

  • Sorption of Inorganic Phosphate by Lake Sediments1

    S. S. Shukla;J. K. Syers;J. D. H. Williams;D. E. Armstrong

  • Adsorption catalyzed chemical hydrolysis of atrazine

    David E. Armstrong;Gordon Chesters

  • Influence of natural dissolved organic carbon on the bioavailability of mercury to a freshwater alga.

    P.R. Gorski;D.E. Armstrong;J.P. Hurley;D.P. Krabbenhoft

  • Fluxes and transformations of aquatic pigments in Lake Mendota, Wisconsin

    James P. Hurley;David E. Armstrong

  • LAKE DISSOLVED INORGANIC CARBON AND DISSOLVED OXYGEN: CHANGING DRIVERS FROM DAYS TO DECADES

    Paul C. Hanson;Stephen R. Carpenter;David E. Armstrong;Emily H. Stanley

  • Rate and Extent of Inorganic Phosphate Exchange in Lake Sediments1

    W. C. Li;D. E. Armstrong;J. D. H. Williams;R. F. Harris

  • Henry's law constants for the polychlorinated biphenyls

    Lawrence P. Burkhard;David E. Armstrong;Anders W. Andren

  • Reply to comment on "Estimation of the atmospheric and nonatmospheric contributions and losses of polychlorinated biphenyls for Lake Michigan on the basis of sediment records of remote lakes.

    Deborah L. Swackhamer;David E. Armstrong

  • A simplified phosphorus analysis technique.

    Unknown

  • Adenosine Triphosphate in Lake Sediments: I. Determination1

    C. C. Lee;R. F. Harris;J. D. H. Williams;D. E. Armstrong

  • Trace Metal Assessment of Lake Michigan Tributaries Using Low-Level Techniques

    James P. Hurley;Martin M. Shafer;Susan E. Cowell;J. T. Overdier

  • Influences of iron, manganese, and dissolved organic carbon on the hypolimnetic cycling of amended mercury.

    Shawn P. Chadwick;Chris L. Babiarz;James P. Hurley;David E. Armstrong

  • Ground Water as a Silica Source for Diatom Production in a Precipitation-Dominated Lake

    James P. Hurley;David E. Armstrong;Galen J. Kenoyer;Carl J. Bowser

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin M. Shafer
Martin M. Shafer University of Wisconsin–Madison
James P. Hurley
James P. Hurley University of Wisconsin–Madison
J. K. Syers
J. K. Syers Massey University
Deborah L. Swackhamer
Deborah L. Swackhamer University of Minnesota
Richard C. Lathrop
Richard C. Lathrop University of Wisconsin–Madison
Rebecca M. Dickhut
Rebecca M. Dickhut Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Eric E. Roden
Eric E. Roden University of Wisconsin–Madison
Timothy K. Kratz
Timothy K. Kratz University of Wisconsin–Madison
David P. Krabbenhoft
David P. Krabbenhoft United States Geological Survey
Monica G. Turner
Monica G. Turner University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences can lead to diverse interdisciplinary opportunities. For students interested in the social aspects of environmental issues, pursuing a best online sociology bachelor degree offers valuable insights into societal behaviors and policies affecting ecosystems.

For education professionals aiming to integrate environmental topics into curricula or community programs, advanced degrees such as earning an edd no dissertation can streamline their academic journey. These programs provide flexible paths to leadership roles without the traditional dissertation process.

Many educators looking to elevate their credentials might consider an online eds to edd bridge program, which supports a seamless transition from a master's to a doctoral degree while accommodating busy schedules.

Additionally, those focusing on social work within environmental contexts can benefit from accessible options like dsw programs online. These programs equip graduates with practical skills to address complex human-environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Armstrong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles