What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Hydrology
His primary scientific interests are in Environmental chemistry, Methylmercury, Hydrology, Wetland and Water column.
His Ecotoxicology study, which is part of a larger body of work in Environmental chemistry, is frequently linked to Flux, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His research in Methylmercury intersects with topics in Watershed, Total organic carbon, Deposition, Bioaccumulation and Dissolved organic carbon.
In his research on the topic of Hydrology, Ecosystem, Soil contamination, Terrestrial ecosystem and Boreal ecosystem is strongly related with Biogeochemical cycle.
The concepts of his Wetland study are interwoven with issues in Discharge, Groundwater recharge, Salt marsh and Groundwater.
His Water column research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Water pollution and Periphyton.
His most cited work include:
- Ecotoxicology of mercury (578 citations)
- Atmospheric mercury deposition during the last 270 years: A glacial ice core record of natural and anthropogenic sources (376 citations)
- Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition (358 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
David P. Krabbenhoft mainly focuses on Environmental chemistry, Methylmercury, Hydrology, Bioaccumulation and Ecology.
His Environmental chemistry study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Soil water and MERCURE.
His studies deal with areas such as Contamination, Water column, STREAMS, Food web and Wetland as well as Methylmercury.
His research integrates issues of Total organic carbon, Ecosystem and Deposition in his study of Hydrology.
The study of Bioaccumulation is intertwined with the study of Aquatic ecosystem in a number of ways.
His study in Trophic level and National park is done as part of Ecology.
He most often published in these fields:
- Environmental chemistry (43.48%)
- Methylmercury (33.82%)
- Hydrology (28.99%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Environmental chemistry (43.48%)
- Methylmercury (33.82%)
- Bioaccumulation (12.08%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
David P. Krabbenhoft mostly deals with Environmental chemistry, Methylmercury, Bioaccumulation, Food web and Biogeochemical cycle.
David P. Krabbenhoft interconnects Permafrost, Contamination and Surface water in the investigation of issues within Environmental chemistry.
His Methylmercury research incorporates themes from Trophic level and Isotope fractionation.
His Bioaccumulation research includes themes of Inlet, Biota, Aquatic ecosystem, Wetland and Biogeochemistry.
His Biogeochemical cycle study incorporates themes from Hydrology and Water quality.
Hydrology and Atmospheric mercury are commonly linked in his work.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Permafrost Stores a Globally Significant Amount of Mercury (102 citations)
- Urban Stormwater: An Overlooked Pathway of Extensive Mixed Contaminants to Surface and Groundwaters in the United States. (30 citations)
- Mercury Stable Isotopes Reveal Influence of Foraging Depth on Mercury Concentrations and Growth in Pacific Bluefin Tuna (21 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Wetland
Environmental chemistry, Methylmercury, Bioaccumulation, STREAMS and Food web are his primary areas of study.
In his papers, David P. Krabbenhoft integrates diverse fields, such as Environmental chemistry and Pacific bluefin tuna.
His work carried out in the field of Methylmercury brings together such families of science as Water quality, Tuna, Logging, Discharge and Taiga.
His study with Bioaccumulation involves better knowledge in Ecology.
His STREAMS study is related to the wider topic of Hydrology.
His studies in Food web integrate themes in fields like Salvelinus, Photic zone, Mass-independent fractionation, Plankton and Benthic zone.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
