World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Katiuscia Sacco

Katiuscia Sacco

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 37 8799 8126 483 464 110 5526

Katiuscia Sacco publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Katiuscia Sacco between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Katiuscia Sacco published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2011. 5 of the 126 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2011. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
2001 2025

126 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Katiuscia Sacco: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 4
2007 3
2008 7
2009 5
2010 10
2011 13
2012 9
2013 9
2014 6
2015 10
2016 10
2017 5
2018 4
2019 2
2020 4
2021 3
2022 6
2023 5
2024 4
2025 1
Total 126
Download as CSV

Katiuscia Sacco publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katiuscia Sacco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 110 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505 110
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Katiuscia Sacco D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katiuscia Sacco sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 37
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Katiuscia Sacco is affiliated with the University of Turin in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a focus on cognitive and social aspects of human perception and brain function.

The main subfields of their work include Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, as well as contributions to Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their research topics cover a range of areas such as Aesthetic Perception and Analysis, Neuroscience and Music Perception, Multisensory Perception and Integration, Action Observation and Synchronization, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Memory and Neural Mechanisms, and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Sacco has coauthored frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Irene Ronga
  • Pietro Sarasso
  • Marco Neppi-Mòdona
  • Paolo Barbieri
  • Elena Del Fante

Their publications have appeared regularly in notable venues such as:

  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Notable recent papers by Katiuscia Sacco include:

  • "Stopping for knowledge": The sense of beauty in the perception-action cycle, 2020, published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Nice and easy: Mismatch negativity responses reveal a significant correlation between aesthetic appreciation and perceptual learning., 2021, published in Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Memorisation and implicit perceptual learning are enhanced for preferred musical intervals and chords, 2021, published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • The Role of Musical Aesthetic Emotions in Social Adaptation to the Covid-19 Pandemic, 2021, published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Preferred music listening is associated with perceptual learning enhancement at the expense of self-focused attention, 2022, published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Best Publications

  • Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain

    Franco Cauda;Federico D'Agata;Katiuscia Sacco;Sergio Duca

  • Meta-analytic clustering of the insular cortex. Characterizing the meta-analytic connectivity of the insula when involved in active tasks

    Franco Cauda;Tommaso Costa;Diana M. E. Torta;Katiuscia Sacco

  • Altered resting state in diabetic neuropathic pain.

    Franco Cauda;Katiuscia Sacco;Sergio Duca;Dario Cocito

  • Functional connectivity and coactivation of the nucleus accumbens: A combined functional connectivity and structure-based meta-analysis

    Franco Cauda;Andrea E. Cavanna;Andrea E. Cavanna;Federico D'agata;Katiuscia Sacco

  • Grey matter abnormality in autism spectrum disorder: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis study

    Franco Cauda;Elisabetta Geda;Katiuscia Sacco;Federico D'Agata

  • Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: a complete pragmatic assessment.

    R. Angeleri;F. M. Bosco;M. Zettin;K. Sacco

  • Motor imagery of walking following training in locomotor attention. The effect of ‘the tango lesson’

    Katiuscia Sacco;Franco Cauda;L. Cerliani;D. Mate

  • Unawareness of deficits in Alzheimer's disease: Role of the Cingulate Cortex

    Martina Amanzio;Diana M. E. Torta;Katiuscia Sacco;Franco Cauda

  • Disrupted intrinsic functional connectivity in the vegetative state

    F Cauda;B M Micon;K Sacco;S Duca

  • Altered resting state attentional networks in diabetic neuropathic pain

    Franco Cauda;Federico D'Agata;Katiuscia Sacco;Sergio Duca

  • Preoperative and intraoperative brain mapping for the resection of eloquent-area tumors. A prospective analysis of methodology, correlation, and usefulness based on clinical outcomes

    Giannantonio Spena;Antonella Nava;Fabrizio Cassini;Antonio Pepoli

  • Low-frequency BOLD fluctuations demonstrate altered thalamocortical connectivity in diabetic neuropathic pain

    Franco Cauda;Katiuscia Sacco;Federico D'Agata;Sergio Duca

  • Functional connectivity of the posteromedial cortex.

    Franco Cauda;Giuliano Geminiani;Federico D'Agata;Katiuscia Sacco

  • Understanding the communicative impairments in schizophrenia: A preliminary study

    Livia Colle;Romina Angeleri;Marianna Vallana;Katiuscia Sacco

  • Assessment Battery for Communication - ABaCo: A new Instrument for the Evaluation of Pragmatic Abilities

    K Sacco;R Angeleri;F M Bosco;L Colle

  • Communicative-pragmatic disorders in traumatic brain injury: The role of theory of mind and executive functions.

    Francesca M. Bosco;Alberto Parola;Katiuscia Sacco;Marina Zettin

  • Assessment battery for communication (ABaCo): normative data

    Romina Angeleri;Francesca Marina Bosco;Ilaria Gabbatore;Bruno Giuseppe Bara

  • The chemotherapy long-term effect on cognitive functions and brain metabolism in lymphoma patients.

    Baudino B;D'agata F;Caroppo P;Castellano G

  • Cognitive Pragmatic Treatment: A Rehabilitative Program for Traumatic Brain Injury Individuals.

    Ilaria Gabbatore;Katiuscia Sacco;Romina Angeleri;Marina Zettin

  • Assessment Battery for Communication: development of two equivalent forms.

    Francesca Marina Bosco;Romina Angeleri;M. Zuffranieri;Bruno Giuseppe Bara

  • Neuroplastic Changes Induced by Cognitive Rehabilitation in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review.

    Valentina Galetto;Katiuscia Sacco

  • Once you feel it, you see it: Insula and sensory-motor contribution to visual awareness for fearful bodies in parietal neglect

    Marco Tamietto;Marco Tamietto;Franco Cauda;Alessia Celeghin;Matteo Diano

Frequent Co-Authors

Franco Cauda
Franco Cauda University of Turin
Giuliano Geminiani
Giuliano Geminiani University of Turin
Federico D'Agata
Federico D'Agata University of Turin
Francesca Bosco
Francesca Bosco Polytechnic University of Turin
Andrea E. Cavanna
Andrea E. Cavanna University of Birmingham
Lorys Castelli
Lorys Castelli University of Turin
Alessandro Vercelli
Alessandro Vercelli University of Turin
Emiliano Ricciardi
Emiliano Ricciardi IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
Andrew P. Bagshaw
Andrew P. Bagshaw University of Birmingham
Marco Tamietto
Marco Tamietto University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of careers in both research and healthcare. If you're interested in maximizing your earning potential, it's helpful to know the majors that make the most money. Several science and technology majors are ranked highly for long-term salary prospects, with neuroscience often providing a solid return on investment.

Online learning has made studying more accessible than ever. Many reputable institutions offer programs in neuroscience and related fields through cheap online colleges that accept fafsa. This can significantly cut down on educational expenses and reduce student debt.

For those looking to quickly advance their careers or specialize their skills, there are numerous online certification courses available in areas like data analysis, medical research, and more. These certifications can help you stand out in a competitive job market.

If you’re exploring broader options, consider programs from the cheapest easiest online degree offerings. These can provide a flexible pathway into neuroscience-related careers or serve as stepping stones to advanced study.

Best Scientists Citing Katiuscia Sacco

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles