World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 40 8092 7471 602 555 112 6375

Andrew P. Bagshaw publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew P. Bagshaw between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew P. Bagshaw published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2006. 16 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2006. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications
1999 2025

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew P. Bagshaw: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 4
2001 5
2002 2
2003 3
2004 2
2005 6
2006 10
2007 5
2008 4
2009 8
2010 6
2011 9
2012 2
2013 6
2014 6
2015 3
2016 5
2017 6
2018 2
2019 5
2020 2
2021 5
2022 4
2023 9
2024 9
2025 7
Total 137
Download as CSV

Andrew P. Bagshaw publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew P. Bagshaw sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 112 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505 112
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew P. Bagshaw D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew P. Bagshaw sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew P. Bagshaw is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and medicine, focusing notably on cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as endocrine and autonomic systems.

The scientist's publication record demonstrates a strong emphasis on functional brain connectivity studies and investigations involving EEG and brain-computer interfaces. Other prominent research topics tackled by Bagshaw include epilepsy research and treatment, sleep and related disorders, sleep and wakefulness research, neural dynamics and brain function, and circadian rhythm and melatonin.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Bagshaw include John R. Terry, Caroline Richards, Wessel Woldman, Martin Wilson, and Leandro Junges. Their work has appeared repeatedly in several publication venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Human Brain Mapping, NeuroImage, Scientific Reports, and Sleep Medicine Reviews.

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Andrew P. Bagshaw include:

  • Sleep disruption in children and adolescents with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, Sleep Medicine Reviews
  • Neurobiological evidence of longer-term physical activity interventions on mental health outcomes and cognition in young people: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials, 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Characterisation of Haemodynamic Activity in Resting State Networks by Fractal Analysis, 2020, International Journal of Neural Systems
  • Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World, 2020, Journal of Visualized Experiments
  • Role of the Ipsilateral Primary Motor Cortex in the Visuo-Motor Network During Fine Contractions and Accurate Performance, 2020, International Journal of Neural Systems

Best Publications

  • Generalized epileptic discharges show thalamocortical activation and suspension of the default state of the brain

    J. Gotman;C. Grova;A. Bagshaw;E. Kobayashi

  • fMRI activation during spike and wave discharges in idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

    Y Aghakhani;A P Bagshaw;C G Bénar;C Hawco

  • Combining EEG and fMRI: A multimodal tool for epilepsy research

    Jean Gotman;Eliane Kobayashi;Andrew P. Bagshaw;Christian-G. Bénar

  • Effect of sleep stage on interictal high‐frequency oscillations recorded from depth macroelectrodes in patients with focal epilepsy

    Andrew P. Bagshaw;Julia Jacobs;Pierre LeVan;François Dubeau

  • EEG-fMRI of focal epileptic spikes: analysis with multiple haemodynamic functions and comparison with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiograms.

    Andrew P. Bagshaw;Yahya Aghakhani;Christian‐G. Bénar;Eliane Kobayashi

  • Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.

    Andrew P Bagshaw;Adam D Liston;Richard H Bayford;Andrew Tizzard

  • EEG-fMRI of epileptic spikes: concordance with EEG source localization and intracranial EEG.

    Christian G. Bénar;Christophe Grova;Eliane Kobayashi;Andrew P. Bagshaw

  • Negative BOLD responses to epileptic spikes.

    Eliane Kobayashi;Andrew P. Bagshaw;Christophe Grova;François Dubeau

  • Temporal and extratemporal BOLD responses to temporal lobe interictal spikes.

    Eliane Kobayashi;Andrew P. Bagshaw;Christian‐George Bénar;Yahya Aghakhani

  • Evidence that the negative BOLD response is neuronal in origin: A simultaneous EEG–BOLD–CBF study in humans

    Karen J. Mullinger;Karen J. Mullinger;Stephen D. Mayhew;Andrew P. Bagshaw;Richard W. Bowtell

  • The structural and functional connectivity of the posterior cingulate cortex: comparison between deterministic and probabilistic tractography for the investigation of structure-function relationships.

    Sakh Khalsa;Stephen D. Mayhew;Magdalena Chechlacz;Manny Bagary

  • BOLD changes occur prior to epileptic spikes seen on scalp EEG.

    Colin S. Hawco;Andrew P. Bagshaw;Andrew P. Bagshaw;Yingli Lu;François Dubeau

  • Spontaneous EEG alpha oscillation interacts with positive and negative BOLD responses in the visual–auditory cortices and default-mode network

    Stephen D. Mayhew;Dirk Ostwald;Camillo Porcaro;Andrew P. Bagshaw

  • Functional connectivity of the posteromedial cortex.

    Franco Cauda;Giuliano Geminiani;Federico D'Agata;Katiuscia Sacco

  • Grey matter heterotopia: what EEG-fMRI can tell us about epileptogenicity of neuronal migration disorders

    Eliane Kobayashi;Andrew P. Bagshaw;Christophe Grova;Jean Gotman

  • Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to activation, deactivation and epileptic discharges.

    Bojana Stefanovic;Jan M. Warnking;Eliane Kobayashi;Andrew P. Bagshaw

  • Concordance between distributed EEG source localization and simultaneous EEG-fMRI studies of epileptic spikes

    Christophe Grova;Jean Daunizeau;Jean Daunizeau;Eliane Kobayashi;Andrew P. Bagshaw;Andrew P. Bagshaw

  • Using voxel-specific hemodynamic response function in EEG-fMRI data analysis.

    Yingli Lu;Andrew P. Bagshaw;Christophe Grova;Eliane Kobayashi

  • Intrinsic epileptogenicity in polymicrogyric cortex suggested by EEG-fMRI BOLD responses.

    Eliane Kobayashi;Andrew Bagshaw;Anna Jansen;Frederick Andermann

  • Poststimulus undershoots in cerebral blood flow and BOLD fMRI responses are modulated by poststimulus neuronal activity

    Karen J. Mullinger;Stephen D. Mayhew;Andrew P. Bagshaw;Richard Bowtell

  • Resetting the late timing of 'night owls' has a positive impact on mental health and performance.

    Elise R. Facer-Childs;Benita Middleton;Debra J. Skene;Andrew P. Bagshaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Camillo Porcaro
Camillo Porcaro University of Padua
Jean Gotman
Jean Gotman Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
François Dubeau
François Dubeau McGill University
Eliane Kobayashi
Eliane Kobayashi Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Christophe Grova
Christophe Grova Concordia University
Christian G. Bénar
Christian G. Bénar Aix-Marseille University
Richard Bayford
Richard Bayford Middlesex University
David Holder
David Holder University College London
Karen J. Mullinger
Karen J. Mullinger University of Nottingham
Richard Bowtell
Richard Bowtell University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andrew P. Bagshaw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles