World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 76 1170 1112 507 469 200 32321

Robert G. Striegl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert G. Striegl between 1985 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert G. Striegl published across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2012. 5 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2012. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 3 publications
1985 2026

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert G. Striegl: publications per year, 1985 to 2026
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 2
1987 2
1988 1
1989 5
1990 2
1991 0
1992 3
1993 3
1994 1
1995 2
1996 5
1997 4
1998 5
1999 5
2000 6
2001 4
2002 2
2003 2
2004 3
2005 3
2006 4
2007 7
2008 5
2009 8
2010 5
2011 7
2012 14
2013 9
2014 9
2015 14
2016 6
2017 9
2018 11
2019 8
2020 6
2021 6
2022 7
2023 8
2024 0
2025 2
2026 3
Total 209
Download as CSV

Robert G. Striegl publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert G. Striegl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 200 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377 200
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert G. Striegl D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert G. Striegl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78 76
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert G. Striegl is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within Earth and Environmental Sciences, with a particular focus on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. The main subfields of study include Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their work addresses a variety of topics related to environmental processes and dynamics, prominently featuring:

  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Robert G. Striegl has contributed to a range of peer-reviewed publications. Notable papers include:

  • Potential impacts of mercury released from thawing permafrost, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Hydrologic connectivity determines dissolved organic matter biogeochemistry in northern high-latitude lakes, 2020, Limnology and Oceanography
  • Integrating terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems to constrain estimates of land-atmosphere carbon exchange, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Recent trends in the chemistry of major northern rivers signal widespread Arctic change, 2023, Nature Geoscience
  • Anthropogenic landcover impacts fluvial dissolved organic matter composition in the Upper Mississippi River Basin, 2021, Biogeochemistry

The scientist frequently publishes in several journals, including:

  • Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Nature Communications
  • Biogeochemistry

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Kimberly P. Wickland
  • M. Dornblaser
  • David Butman
  • Robert G. M. Spencer
  • Fenix Garcia-Tigreros

The body of work conducted by Robert G. Striegl contributes to understanding large-scale environmental changes, particularly in Arctic and northern latitude contexts. Their research helps elucidate the biogeochemical processes influencing the exchange of gases between land, water, and atmosphere, as well as the effects of permafrost thawing and landcover change on aquatic chemistry and ecosystem dynamics.

Best Publications

  • Plumbing the Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Inland Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget

    Jonathan J. Cole;Yves T. Prairie;Nina F. Caraco;William H. McDowell

  • Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate

    Lars J. Tranvik;John A. Downing;James B. Cotner;Steven A. Loiselle

  • Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters

    Peter A. Raymond;Jens Hartmann;Ronny Lauerwald;Ronny Lauerwald;Sebastian Sobek

  • The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments

    J.A. Downing;Y.T. Prairie;J.J. Cole;C.M. Duarte

  • Seasonal and Annual Fluxes of Nutrients and Organic Matter from Large Rivers to the Arctic Ocean and Surrounding Seas

    Robert Max Holmes;James W. McClelland;Bruce J. Peterson;Suzanne E. Tank

  • Increased groundwater to stream discharge from permafrost thawing in the Yukon River basin: Potential impacts on lateral export of carbon and nitrogen

    Michelle Ann Walvoord;Robert G. Striegl

  • Sediment organic carbon burial in agriculturally eutrophic impoundments over the last century

    John A. Downing;John A. Downing;Jonathan J. Cole;Jack J. Middelburg;Robert G. Striegl

  • Flux and age of dissolved organic carbon exported to the Arctic Ocean: A carbon isotopic study of the five largest arctic rivers

    Peter A. Raymond;James W McClelland;R. M. Holmes;A. V. Zhulidov

  • Vulnerability of high-latitude soil organic carbon in North America to disturbance

    Guido Grosse;Jennifer W. Harden;Merritt Turetsky;A. David McGuire

  • A decrease in discharge‐normalized DOC export by the Yukon River during summer through autumn

    Robert G. Striegl;George R. Aiken;Mark M. Dornblaser;Peter A. Raymond

  • A comparison of six methods for measuring soil‐surface carbon dioxide fluxes

    J.M. Norman;C.J. Kucharik;S.T. Gower;D.D. Baldocchi

  • A Reservoir of Nitrate Beneath Desert Soils

    Michelle Ann Walvoord;Fred M. Phillips;David A. Stonestrom;R. Dave Evans

  • Comparing nocturnal eddy covariance measurements to estimates of ecosystem respiration made by scaling chamber measurements at six coniferous boreal sites

    M.B. Lavigne;M.G. Ryan;D.E. Anderson;D.D. Baldocchi

  • Global abundance and size distribution of streams and rivers

    John A. Downing;Jonathan J. Cole;Carlos A. Duarte;Jack J. Middelburg

  • Seasonal and spatial variability in dissolved organic matter quantity and composition from the Yukon River basin, Alaska

    Robert G. M. Spencer;George R. Aiken;Kimberly P. Wickland;Robert G. Striegl

  • Permafrost Stores a Globally Significant Amount of Mercury

    Paul F. Schuster;Kevin Schaefer;George R. Aiken;Ronald C. Antweiler

  • Numerical Evaluation of Static-Chamber Measurements of Soil—Atmosphere Gas Exchange: Identification of Physical Processes

    Richard W. Healy;Robert G. Striegl;Thomas F. Russell;Gordon L. Hutchinson

  • The river as a chemostat: fresh perspectives on dissolved organic matter flowing down the river continuum

    Irena F. Creed;Diane M. McKnight;Brian A. Pellerin;Mark B. Green

  • Performance of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 surface reflectance products for river remote sensing retrievals of chlorophyll-a and turbidity

    Catherine Kuhn;Aline de Matos Valerio;Nick Ward;Nick Ward;Luke Loken;Luke Loken

  • Utilizing chromophoric dissolved organic matter measurements to derive export and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon exported to the Arctic Ocean: A case study of the Yukon River, Alaska

    Robert G. M. Spencer;Robert G. M. Spencer;George R. Aiken;Kenna D. Butler;Mark M. Dornblaser

  • Carbon dioxide and methane emissions from the Yukon River system

    Robert G. Striegl;Mark M. Dornblaser;Cory P. McDonald;Jennifer R. Rover

Frequent Co-Authors

Kimberly P. Wickland
Kimberly P. Wickland United States Geological Survey
David Butman
David Butman University of Washington
Robert G. M. Spencer
Robert G. M. Spencer Florida State University
George R. Aiken
George R. Aiken United States Geological Survey
David W. Clow
David W. Clow United States Geological Survey
Suzanne E. Tank
Suzanne E. Tank University of Alberta
Peter A. Raymond
Peter A. Raymond Yale University
James W. McClelland
James W. McClelland The University of Texas at Austin
David P. Krabbenhoft
David P. Krabbenhoft United States Geological Survey
Emily H. Stanley
Emily H. Stanley University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in broadening their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, related fields like sociology and education offer valuable online degree options. Pursuing best online bachelors in sociology programs can deepen understanding of societal impacts on environmental policies.

Educators and professionals aiming to advance their careers may consider programs without extensive research commitments. For instance, edd without dissertation options provide a streamlined path for leadership roles in education and environmental advocacy.

Continuing education through the best online eds to edd programs allows professionals to transition from a master's level to doctoral studies flexibly, ideal for working individuals balancing career and study.

For those interested in social work related to environmental justice, exploring fully funded dsw programs online can open doors to impactful leadership roles while minimizing financial burden.

Integrating these pathways can enhance one’s ability to tackle complex environmental challenges through interdisciplinary perspectives and advanced leadership skills.

Best Scientists Citing Robert G. Striegl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles