World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
51
Citations
9237
World Ranking
3237
National Ranking
1294

David W. Clow publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Clow sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 118 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

David W. Clow D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David W. Clow sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

David W. Clow is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions to earth and planetary sciences.

Their work spans multiple subfields, including:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Environmental Chemistry

Main research topics covered by David W. Clow include:

  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems

The following list provides some of their recent papers along with publication years and venues:

  • Spatiotemporal Dynamics of CO2 Gas Exchange From Headwater Mountain Streams, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • A call for strategic water-quality monitoring to advance assessment and prediction of wildfire impacts on water supplies, 2023, Frontiers in Water
  • Spatial Variability in Seasonal Snowpack Trends across the Rio Grande Headwaters (1984-2017), 2020, Journal of Hydrometeorology
  • Changes in Climate and Land Cover Affect Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts in the Rio Grande Headwaters, 2020, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
  • Elevated Nitrogen Deposition to Fire-Prone Forests Adjacent to Urban and Agricultural Areas, Colorado Front Range, USA, 2022, Earth's Future

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David W. Clow include:

  • Sheila F. Murphy
  • Garrett A. Akie
  • Gregory Clark
  • Brian A. Ebel
  • G. A. Sexstone

The scientist has published repeatedly in the following venues:

  • Hydrological Processes
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • Frontiers in Water
  • Earth's Future
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology

Best Publications

  • Concentration–discharge relationships reflect chemostatic characteristics of US catchments

    Sarah E. Godsey;James W. Kirchner;James W. Kirchner;James W. Kirchner;David W. Clow

  • Changes in the timing of snowmelt and streamflow in Colorado: a response to recent warming

    David W. Clow

  • Organic carbon burial in global lakes and reservoirs

    Raquel Mendonça;Roger A. Müller;David Clow;Charles Verpoorter;Charles Verpoorter

  • The river as a chemostat: fresh perspectives on dissolved organic matter flowing down the river continuum

    Irena F. Creed;Diane M. McKnight;Brian A. Pellerin;Mark B. Green

  • The role of disseminated calcite in the chemical weathering of granitoid rocks

    Art F White;Thomas D Bullen;Davison V Vivit;Marjorie S Schulz

  • Ground Water Occurrence and Contributions to Streamflow in an Alpine Catchment, Colorado Front Range

    D.W. Clow;L. Schrott;R. Webb;D.H. Campbell

  • Aquatic carbon cycling in the conterminous United States and implications for terrestrial carbon accounting

    David Butman;David Butman;Sarah M. Stackpoole;Edward G. Stets;Cory P. McDonald

  • Processes Controlling the Chemistry of Two Snowmelt‐Dominated Streams in the Rocky Mountains

    Donald H. Campbell;David W. Clow;George P. Ingersoll;M. Alisa Mast

  • Strontium 87/strontium 86 as a tracer of mineral weathering reactions and calcium sources in an Alpine/Subalpine Watershed, Loch Vale, Colorado

    David W. Clow;Alisa Mast;Thomas D. Bullen;John T. Turk

  • Weathering rates in catchments

    J. I. Drever;D. W. Clow

  • Ecosystem Processes and Human Influences Regulate Streamflow Response to Climate Change at Long-Term Ecological Research Sites

    Julia A. Jones;Irena F. Creed;Kendra L. Hatcher;Robert J. Warren

  • Changing forest water yields in response to climate warming: results from long‐term experimental watershed sites across North America

    Irena F. Creed;Adam T. Spargo;Julia A. Jones;Jim M. Buttle

  • Winter fluxes of CO2 and CH4 from subalpine soils in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado

    M. Alisa Mast;Kimberly P. Wickland;Robert T. Striegl;David W. Clow

  • Evidence for nutrient enrichment of high-elevation lakes in the Sierra Nevada, California

    James O. Sickman;John M. Melack;David W. Clow

  • Hydrological effects of forest transpiration loss in bark beetle-impacted watersheds

    Lindsay A. Bearup;Reed M. Maxwell;David W. Clow;John E. McCray

  • Mechanisms for chemostatic behavior in catchments: Implications for CO2 consumption by mineral weathering

    David W. Clow;M. Alisa Mast

  • Weathering rates as a function of flow through an alpine soil

    D.W. Clow;J.I. Drever

  • Carbon gas exchange at a southern Rocky Mountain wetland, 1996–1998

    Kimberly P. Wickland;Robert G. Striegl;M. Alisa Mast;David W. Clow

  • Evaluation of SNODAS snow depth and snow water equivalent estimates for the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA

    David W. Clow;Leora Nanus;Leora Nanus;Kristine L. Verdin;Jeffrey Schmidt

  • Relations between basin characteristics and stream water chemistry in alpine/subalpine basins in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado

    David W. Clow;Julie K. Sueker

  • Melting Alpine Glaciers Enrich High-Elevation Lakes with Reactive Nitrogen

    Jasmine E. Saros;Kevin C. Rose;David W. Clow;Verlin C. Stephens

  • Comparison of total mercury and methylmercury cycling at five sites using the small watershed approach

    James B. Shanley;M. Alisa Mast;Donald H. Campbell;George R. Aiken

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert G. Striegl
Robert G. Striegl United States Geological Survey
M. Alisa Mast
M. Alisa Mast United States Geological Survey
David Butman
David Butman University of Washington
Jill S. Baron
Jill S. Baron United States Geological Survey
Irena F. Creed
Irena F. Creed University of Toronto
Mark W. Williams
Mark W. Williams Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research
Reed M. Maxwell
Reed M. Maxwell Princeton University
David P. Krabbenhoft
David P. Krabbenhoft United States Geological Survey
James O. Sickman
James O. Sickman University of California, Riverside
Jasmine E. Saros
Jasmine E. Saros University of Maine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths and educational opportunities. For seniors seeking flexible learning options, one can find valuable insights in one year degree programs for seniors, which offer accelerated, focused studies suitable for those looking to upskill or change careers efficiently.

Beyond traditional Earth Science fields, related disciplines such as library science present viable career routes. By gaining specialized knowledge through an ala accredited mlis programs, students can work with environmental data archives or scientific publications, highlighting the interdisciplinary nature of Earth Science.

Considering whether is library science a good degree can help potential students evaluate the practical benefits and job prospects tied to this complementary field. Many Earth Science professionals find that skills in information management enhance their research and project capabilities.

Additionally, with technological advancements, the visual documentation of geological phenomena is increasingly important. Exploring programs such as the online digital photography degree can equip students with the skills to capture and analyze visual data, enriching their scientific work and expanding career options.

Best Scientists Citing David W. Clow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles