What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Surgery
- Visual acuity
- Ophthalmology
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Ophthalmology, Visual acuity, Surgery, Cornea and Keratomileusis.
His Optometry research extends to Ophthalmology, which is thematically connected.
His Visual acuity research includes themes of Spherical aberration and Presbyopia.
His Cornea research incorporates themes from Inflammation, Keratitis and Pathology.
His work in Keratomileusis addresses issues such as LASIK, which are connected to fields such as Microkeratome.
Jorge L. Alió combines subjects such as Astigmatism and Ultrasound with his study of Corneal topography.
His most cited work include:
- Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. (331 citations)
- Corneal Higher Order Aberrations: A Method to Grade Keratoconus (280 citations)
- Detection and Identification of Fungal Pathogens by PCR and by ITS2 and 5.8S Ribosomal DNA Typing in Ocular Infections (232 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Ophthalmology, Surgery, Visual acuity, LASIK and Cornea.
His work in Dioptre, Refractive error, Keratoconus, Intraocular lens and Corneal topography are all subfields of Ophthalmology research.
His work deals with themes such as Optometry and Cataract surgery, which intersect with Intraocular lens.
His studies in Eye disease and Phacoemulsification are all subfields of Surgery research.
His study on Visual acuity is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Astigmatism.
His work investigates the relationship between LASIK and topics such as Keratomileusis that intersect with problems in Photorefractive keratectomy.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ophthalmology (60.56%)
- Surgery (27.54%)
- Visual acuity (23.79%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Ophthalmology (60.56%)
- Keratoconus (12.36%)
- Optometry (16.43%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Ophthalmology, Keratoconus, Optometry, Surgery and Cornea.
His study in Visual acuity, Distance visual acuity, Corneal topography, LASIK and Cataract surgery falls within the category of Ophthalmology.
He has researched LASIK in several fields, including Keratomileusis and Refractive surgery.
In his study, Phacoemulsification is strongly linked to Intraocular lens, which falls under the umbrella field of Cataract surgery.
His Corneal pachymetry study in the realm of Keratoconus interacts with subjects such as Stroma.
As part of one scientific family, Jorge L. Alió deals mainly with the area of Optometry, narrowing it down to issues related to the Multifocal intraocular lens, and often Patient satisfaction and Contrast.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Multifocal Intraocular Lenses: An Overview (86 citations)
- Phase II Randomized, Double-Masked, Vehicle-Controlled Trial of Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor for Neurotrophic Keratitis. (71 citations)
- Corneal Stroma Enhancement With Decellularized Stromal Laminas With or Without Stem Cell Recellularization for Advanced Keratoconus (43 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Surgery
- Visual acuity
- Ophthalmology
Jorge L. Alió mostly deals with Ophthalmology, Optometry, Keratoconus, Visual acuity and Surgery.
His work often combines Ophthalmology and In patient studies.
His Optometry study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Intraocular lenses, Near vision, Accommodation and Multifocal intraocular lens.
His Keratoconus research incorporates elements of Decellularization and Corneal topography.
His study in Visual acuity is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Corneal melting, Optical coherence tomography, Facial nerve and Neurotrophic corneal ulcer.
Jorge L. Alió has included themes like Keratitis and Infectious Keratitis in his Surgery study.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
