World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
4259
World Ranking
8871
National Ranking
237

Jan W. Van Strien publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan W. Van Strien sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 100 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jan W. Van Strien D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan W. Van Strien sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan W. Van Strien is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with significant contributions in cognitive neuroscience and clinical psychology. They have also worked in sociology and political science, social psychology, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

Their work addresses multiple research topics, including:

  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology

Jan W. Van Strien has published several papers in various peer-reviewed venues. Noteworthy recent publications include:

  • "Both low and high spatial frequencies drive the early posterior negativity in response to snake stimuli" (2022) in Neuropsychologia
  • "The effect of fearful expressions on recognition memory for faces: Behavioral and electrophysiological data" (2020) in International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • "To each their own: sociodemographic disparities in student mental health" (2024) in Frontiers in Education
  • "Early posterior negativity in humans to pictures of snakes and spiders: effects of proximity" (2020) in Experimental Brain Research
  • "Outperforming in the Workplace: Predicting Employee Sensitivity About Being the Target of a Threatening Upward Comparison" (2024) in Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Neuropsychologia
  • Frontiers in Education
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Basic and Applied Social Psychology
  • Experimental Brain Research

The scientist has collaborated regularly with colleagues including:

  • Nick Beligiannis
  • Alexandra A. M. Zuiker
  • Marise Ph. Born
  • Merel Hermus
  • Liselotte Gootjes

Best Publications

  • Impulsivity is associated with behavioral decision-making deficits.

    Ingmar H.A. Franken;Jan W. van Strien;Ilse Nijs;Peter Muris

  • Merely Being with you Increases My Attention to Luxury Products: Using EEG to Understand Consumers’ Emotional Experience with Luxury Branded Products:

    Rumen Ivaylov Pozharliev;Willem Jmi Verbeke;Jan W. Van Strien;Richard P. Bagozzi

  • Error-processing deficits in patients with cocaine dependence.

    Ingmar H A Franken;Jan W van Strien;Ernst J Franzek;Ben J M van de Wetering

  • Event-related potential responses to love-related facial stimuli

    Sandra J.E. Langeslag;Bernadette M. Jansma;Ingmar H.A. Franken;Jan W. Van Strien

  • Distinct Brain Systems Underlie the Processing of Valence and Arousal of Affective Pictures.

    M.M.A. Nielen;D.J. Heslenfeld;K. Heinen;J.W. Van Strien

  • Aging and emotional memory: the co-occurrence of neurophysiological and behavioral positivity effects.

    Sandra J. E. Langeslag;Jan W. van Strien

  • Opposite hemispheric activations as a result of emotionally threatening and non-threatening words

    Jan W. Van Strien;Monica Morpurgo

  • Implicit emotion regulation in the context of viewing artworks: ERP evidence in response to pleasant and unpleasant pictures

    Noah N.N. Van Dongen;Jan W. Van Strien;Katinka Dijkstra

  • Changes in brain electrical activity during extended continuous word recognition

    Jan W. Van Strien;Rogier E. Hagenbeek;Cornelis J. Stam;Serge A.R.B. Rombouts

  • The Dutch Handedness Questionnaire

    Jan W. Van Strien

  • Effects of recent word exposure on emotion-word Stroop interference: an ERP study.

    Liselotte Gootjes;Leonora C. Coppens;Rolf A. Zwaan;Ingmar H.A. Franken

  • Corpus callosum size correlates with asymmetric performance on a dichotic listening task in healthy aging but not in Alzheimer's disease.

    L. Gootjes;A. Bouma;J.W. Van Strien;R. Van Schijndel

  • Ratings of Emotion in Laterally Presented Faces: Sex and handedness effects

    Jan W. Van Strien;Sascha Van Beek

  • Cocaine craving is associated with electrophysiological brain responses to cocaine-related stimuli

    Ingmar H. A. Franken;Roeland C. Dietvorst;Mirjam Hesselmans;Ernst J. Franzek

  • Cognitive Emotion Regulation in Yogic Meditative Practitioners Sustained Modulation of Electrical Brain Potentials

    Liselotte Gootjes;Ingmar H. A. Franken;Jan W. Van Strien

  • Testing the snake-detection hypothesis: larger early posterior negativity in humans to pictures of snakes than to pictures of other reptiles, spiders and slugs.

    Jan W. Van Strien;Ingmar H. A. Franken;Jorg Huijding

  • Snake scales, partial exposure, and the Snake Detection Theory: A human event-related potentials study.

    Jan W Van Strien;Lynne A Isbell

  • Valence interacts with the early ERP old/new effect and arousal with the sustained ERP old/new effect for affective pictures.

    Jan W. Van Strien;Sandra J.E. Langeslag;Nadja J. Strekalova;Liselotte Gootjes

  • Left–Right and Upper–Lower Visual Field Asymmetries for Face Matching, Letter Naming, and Lexical Decision☆

    Rogier E. Hagenbeek;Jan W. Van Strien

  • Evidence for a Broad Autism Phenotype

    Kristel De Groot;Jan W. Van Strien

  • Electrophysiological correlates of word repetition spacing: ERP and induced band power old/new effects with massed and spaced repetitions.

    Jan W. Van Strien;Peter P.J.L. Verkoeijen;Nelly Van der Meer;Ingmar H.A. Franken

  • Evidence for a deficit in the salience attribution to errors in smokers

    Ingmar H.A. Franken;Jan W. van Strien;Ilse Kuijpers

  • Automatic processing of emotional words during an emotional Stroop task.

    Ingmar H.A. Franken;Liselotte Gootjes;Jan W. van Strien

Frequent Co-Authors

Ingmar H.A. Franken
Ingmar H.A. Franken Erasmus University Rotterdam
David Edmund Johannes Linden
David Edmund Johannes Linden Maastricht University
Anke Bouma
Anke Bouma University of Groningen
Willem Verbeke
Willem Verbeke Erasmus University Rotterdam
Peter Muris
Peter Muris Maastricht University
Cornelis J. Stam
Cornelis J. Stam Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Albert Postma
Albert Postma Utrecht University
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Richard P. Bagozzi
Richard P. Bagozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rolf A. Zwaan
Rolf A. Zwaan Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in neuroscience, there are many related online degrees that can complement your career or open new pathways. Pursuing psychology degrees online is a popular choice, offering an in-depth understanding of human behavior and mental processes. These programs often provide flexibility and affordability for students balancing other responsibilities.

A masters in social work online programs can prepare you for roles in clinical social work, counseling, or community outreach. These degrees focus on practical applications of psychological knowledge to improve individual and community well-being.

Those seeking advanced clinical training might consider the best online psyd programs, which specialize in preparing graduates for professional practice in psychology. Additionally, exploring the best online mft programs offers a direct pathway to careers in marriage and family therapy, integrating psychological and neuroscientific insights with hands-on clinical practice.

Carefully comparing these options can help you find the right pathway, whether you seek a research focus, clinical practice, or a blend of both in the exciting field of neuroscience and its related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Jan W. Van Strien

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles