World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
70
Citations
15765
World Ranking
997
National Ranking
469

Mark W. Williams publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Williams sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 556 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 235 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

Mark W. Williams D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark W. Williams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 181 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark W. Williams is affiliated with the Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research in the United States. Their research spans multiple scientific disciplines including materials chemistry, biomedical engineering, global and planetary change, surgery, and experimental and cognitive psychology. The subfields with the highest concentration of publications include Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, with notable contributions in Global and Planetary Change as well.

The primary topics of Mark W. Williams' work encompass a range of scientific and medical areas. These include:

  • Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

Mark W. Williams has coauthored frequently with several researchers, including:

  • David Aragão
  • J. Brandão-Neto
  • Anna Carbery
  • Adam Crawshaw
  • Alexandre Dias

The research outputs of Mark W. Williams have appeared in diverse academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • HPB
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

Representative recent publications by Mark W. Williams include:

  • "Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders: Outcomes From a Multi-State, Multi-Site Primary Care Practice" (2020), Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • ""Listening to the Sounds of the Water": Bringing Together Local Knowledge and Biophysical Data to Understand Climate-Related Hazard Dynamics" (2021), International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
  • "Cognitive behavioral therapy for depressive disorders: Outcomes from a multi-state, multi-site primary care practice" (2021), Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "Characterization of organic-rich mineral debris revealed by rapid glacier retreat, Indren Glacier, European Alps" (2021), Journal of Mountain Science
  • "Raw diffraction data for structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease with Z44592329 (ID: mpro-x0434 / PDB: 5R83)" (2020), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Mark W. Williams is also credited with book publications, including a work published by Emerald Publishing Limited:

  • Climate-Induced Disasters in the Asia-Pacific Region: Response, Recovery, Adaptation (2020)

Best Publications

  • Winter forest soil respiration controlled by climate and microbial community composition

    Russell K. Monson;David L. Lipson;Sean P. Burns;Andrew A. Turnipseed

  • Can we measure snow depth with GPS receivers

    Kristine M. Larson;Ethan D. Gutmann;Valery U. Zavorotny;John J. Braun

  • Inorganic nitrogen and microbial biomass dynamics before and during spring snowmelt

    Paul D. Brooks;Mark W. Williams;Steven K. Schmidt

  • Changes in assembly processes in soil bacterial communities following a wildfire disturbance

    Scott Ferrenberg;Sean P O'Neill;Sean P O'Neill;Joseph E Knelman;Joseph E Knelman;Bryan Todd

  • Microbial activity under alpine snowpacks, Niwot Ridge, Colorado.

    Paul D. Brooks;Mark W. Williams;Steven K. Schmidt

  • Winter production of CO2 and N2O from alpine tundra: environmental controls and relationship to inter-system C and N fluxes.

    Paul D. Brooks;Steven K. Schmidt;Mark W. Williams

  • Source waters and flow paths in an alpine catchment, Colorado Front Range, United States

    Fengjing Liu;Mark W. Williams;Nel Caine

  • Decadal changes in glacier parameters in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru, derived from remote sensing

    Adina E. Racoviteanu;Yves Arnaud;Mark. W. Williams;Julio Ordóñez

  • Snowpack controls on nitrogen cycling and export in seasonally snow-covered catchments

    Paul D. Brooks;Mark W. Williams

  • Nitrogen saturation in the Rocky Mountains

    Mark W. Williams;Jill S. Baron;Nel Caine;Richard Sommerfeld

  • Optical Remote Sensing of Glacier Characteristics: A Review with Focus on the Himalaya.

    Adina E. Racoviteanu;Mark W. Williams;Mark W. Williams;Roger G. Barry

  • Persistence of topographic controls on the spatial distribution of snow in rugged mountain terrain, Colorado, United States

    Tyler A. Erickson;Tyler A. Erickson;Mark W. Williams;Adam Winstral

  • Solute chemistry of snowmelt and runoff in an Alpine Basin, Sierra Nevada

    Mark W. Williams;John M. Melack

  • CRITICAL LOADS FOR INORGANIC NITROGEN DEPOSITION IN THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE, USA

    Mark W. Williams;Kathy A. Tonnessen

  • WATER AND MINING CONFLICTS IN PERU

    Anthony Bebbington;Mark Williams

  • Geochemistry and source waters of rock glacier outflow, Colorado Front Range

    M. W. Williams;M. Knauf;N. Caine;F. Liu

  • Changes in climate and hydrochemical responses in a high-elevation catchment in the Rocky Mountains, USA

    Mark W. Williams;Mark Losleben;Nel Caine;David Greenland

  • Topographic controls on snow distribution, soil moisture, and species diversity of herbaceous alpine vegetation, Niwot Ridge, Colorado

    M. I. Litaor;M. Williams;T. R. Seastedt

  • Ecosystem Processes and Human Influences Regulate Streamflow Response to Climate Change at Long-Term Ecological Research Sites

    Julia A. Jones;Irena F. Creed;Kendra L. Hatcher;Robert J. Warren

  • Changing forest water yields in response to climate warming: results from long‐term experimental watershed sites across North America

    Irena F. Creed;Adam T. Spargo;Julia A. Jones;Jim M. Buttle

  • Sources of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in a Rocky Mountain stream using chemical fractionation and stable isotopes

    Eran Hood;Mark W. Williams;Diane M. McKnight

  • Evaluating digital elevation models for glaciologic applications: An example from Nevado Coropuna, Peruvian Andes

    Adina E. Racoviteanu;Adina E. Racoviteanu;William F. Manley;Yves Arnaud;Mark W. Williams;Mark W. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Noah P. Molotch
Noah P. Molotch University of Colorado Boulder
Nel Caine
Nel Caine University of Colorado Boulder
Steven K. Schmidt
Steven K. Schmidt University of Colorado Boulder
Diane M. McKnight
Diane M. McKnight University of Colorado Boulder
Sean P. Burns
Sean P. Burns University of Colorado Boulder
Peter D. Blanken
Peter D. Blanken University of Colorado Boulder
Detlev Helmig
Detlev Helmig Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research
Paul D. Brooks
Paul D. Brooks University of Utah
Eran Hood
Eran Hood University of Alaska Southeast
Russell K. Monson
Russell K. Monson University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in diversifying their expertise beyond Earth Science, pursuing an accredited online masters degree in human resource management can open doors to leadership roles within environmental organizations or research institutions. This combination of technical and managerial skills is highly valued in today’s interdisciplinary job market.

Many learners explore educational opportunities later in life, and there are tailored options such as college degrees for seniors that support continued professional growth or personal enrichment. These programs often offer flexible pacing and accommodate different life commitments.

For those fascinated by information management and data curation in Earth Science research, a mlis ala accredited programs provide critical training in organizing and preserving scientific data. Graduates from these programs help make vast environmental data accessible and useful across sectors.

If you’re wondering is a library science degree worth it, it’s important to consider how the discipline’s focus on information technologies aligns with growing demands in research libraries and archives that support Earth Science initiatives worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Mark W. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles