World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
13256
World Ranking
3084
National Ranking
132

Chemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
11690
World Ranking
13413
National Ranking
365

Marc Amyot publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Amyot sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 172 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Marc Amyot D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc Amyot sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc Amyot is affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada. Their research predominantly contributes to the field of Environmental Science, with a particular focus on health, toxicology, and mutagenesis, comprising the largest portion of their scholarly output. Additional subfields of Amyot's work include ecology, pollution, geochemistry and petrology, and environmental chemistry.

Their main research topics highlight studies related to mercury impact and mitigation, heavy metals in the environment, heavy metal exposure and toxicity, toxic organic pollutants, marine animal studies, environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology, and isotope analysis in ecology.

Marc Amyot has authored several papers across notable scientific journals. Recent publications include:

  • Climate change and mercury in the Arctic: Abiotic interactions (2022), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Experimental evidence for recovery of mercury-contaminated fish populations (2021), published in Nature
  • Selenium Interactions with Algae: Chemical Processes at Biological Uptake Sites, Bioaccumulation, and Intracellular Metabolism (2020), published in Plants
  • Rare earth elements (REEs) behavior in a large river across a geological and anthropogenic gradient (2023), published in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
  • Hydrologic control on winter dissolved oxygen mediates arsenic cycling in a small subarctic lake (2020), published in Limnology and Oceanography

Frequent co-authors of Amyot include Dominic E. Ponton, Jean-François Lapierre, Maikel Rosabal, François Bilodeau, and Paul A. del Giorgio. These collaborations indicate a network established in diverse environmental science topics.

Their work is regularly published in venues such as The Science of The Total Environment, SSRN Electronic Journal, Environmental Pollution, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Chemosphere. The Science of The Total Environment is the leading journal for Amyot's contributions, with eleven publications.

Best Publications

  • THE CHEMICAL CYCLE AND BIOACCUMULATION OF MERCURY

    François M. M. Morel;Anne M. L. Kraepiel;Marc Amyot

  • Reviews and syntheses: Effects of permafrost thaw on Arctic aquatic ecosystems

    J. E. Vonk;S. E. Tank;W. B. Bowden;I. Laurion

  • Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition

    Reed C. Harris;John W. M. Rudd;Marc Amyot;Christopher L. Babiarz

  • A synthesis of atmospheric mercury depletion event chemistry in the atmosphere and snow

    A. Steffen;T. Douglas;M. Amyot;P. Ariya

  • Mercury physicochemical and biogeochemical transformation in the atmosphere and at atmospheric interfaces: a review and future directions.

    Parisa A. Ariya;Marc Amyot;Ashu Dastoor;Daniel Deeds

  • Sunlight-induced formation of dissolved gaseous mercury in lake waters.

    Marc. Amyot;Donald J. McQueen;Greg. Mierle;David R. S. Lean

  • Methanogens: Principal Methylators of Mercury in Lake Periphyton

    Stéphanie Hamelin;Marc Amyot;Tamar Barkay;Yanping Wang

  • Production and Loss of Dissolved Gaseous Mercury in Coastal Seawater

    Marc Amyot;Gary A. Gill;François M. M. Morel

  • The Arctic: a sink for mercury

    Parisa A. Ariya;Ashu P. Dastoor;Marc Amyot;William H. Schroeder

  • The role of mercury redox reactions in snow on snow-to-air mercury transfer.

    Janick D. Lalonde;and Alexandre J. Poulain;Marc Amyot

  • Photooxidation of Hg(0) in artificial and natural waters.

    Janick D. Lalonde;Marc Amyot;and Anne M. L. Kraepiel;François M. M. Morel

  • New directions: The role of bioaerosols in atmospheric chemistry and physics

    Parisa A Ariya;Marc Amyot

  • Widespread occurrence and spatial distribution of glyphosate, atrazine, and neonicotinoids pesticides in the St. Lawrence and tributary rivers

    Juan Manuel Montiel-León;Gabriel Munoz;Sung Vo Duy;Dat Tien Do

  • Mercury Water−Air Exchange over the Upper St. Lawrence River and Lake Ontario

    Laurier Poissant;Marc Amyot;Martin Pilote;David Lean

  • Mercury in the marine environment of the Canadian Arctic: Review of recent findings

    Birgit Braune;John Chételat;Marc Amyot;Tanya Brown

  • New evidence on variations of human body burden of methylmercury from fish consumption.

    René Canuel;Sylvie Boucher de Grosbois;Laura Atikessé;Marc Lucotte

  • Effects of various cooking methods and food components on bioaccessibility of mercury from fish

    Ousséni Ouédraogo;Marc Amyot

  • Microbiological degradation of atmospheric organic compounds

    Parisa A. Ariya;Oleg Nepotchatykh;Olga Ignatova;Marc Amyot

  • The fate of mercury in Arctic terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, a review

    Thomas A. Douglas;Lisa L. Loseto;Robie W. Macdonald;Peter Outridge

  • Photochemical Formation of volatile mercury in high Arctic lakes

    Marc Amyot;David Lean;Greg Mierle

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexandre J. Poulain
Alexandre J. Poulain University of Ottawa
Parisa A. Ariya
Parisa A. Ariya McGill University
Dolors Planas
Dolors Planas University of Quebec at Montreal
Holger Hintelmann
Holger Hintelmann Trent University
David R. S. Lean
David R. S. Lean University of Ottawa
Laurier Poissant
Laurier Poissant Environment and Climate Change Canada
Tamar Barkay
Tamar Barkay Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
François M. M. Morel
François M. M. Morel Princeton University
Aurélien Dommergue
Aurélien Dommergue Grenoble Alpes University
Christophe Ferrari
Christophe Ferrari Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students seek programs that balance quality with manageability, making the easiest bachelor degree to get a valuable starting point in selecting a suitable major.

Specializations such as geology and geoscience play a critical role in understanding environmental systems. Several top institutions offer online geology degrees that provide flexible learning options without compromising academic rigor.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are essential tools for environmental analysis and planning. Aspiring professionals can find the best GIS schools that offer cutting-edge online programs to develop these technical skills.

For those aiming to expand into public administration roles focused on environmental policies, a 1 year MPA online program could accelerate career growth by building leadership and policy expertise in a condensed timeframe.

Best Scientists Citing Marc Amyot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles