World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roger Armstrong

Roger Armstrong

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
42
Citations
5399
World Ranking
3548
National Ranking
245

Roger Armstrong publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger Armstrong sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 186 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Roger Armstrong D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger Armstrong sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Chemical characteristics of phosphorus in alkaline soils from southern Australia

    Isabelle. Bertrand;R. J. Holloway;Roger. Armstrong;M. J. McLaughlin

  • Crop residue phosphorus: speciation and potential bio-availability

    Sarah R. Noack;Mike J. McLaughlin;Ronald J. Smernik;Therese M. McBeath

  • Changes and availability of P fractions following 65 years of P application to a calcareous soil in a Mediterranean climate

    D. T. Vu;C. Tang;R. D. Armstrong

  • Mobility and Lability of Phosphorus from Granular and Fluid Monoammonium Phosphate Differs in a Calcareous Soil

    E. Lombi;M. J. McLaughlin;C. Johnston;R. D. Armstrong

  • Subsoil constraints to crop production on neutral and alkaline soils in south-eastern Australia: a review of current knowledge and management strategies

    D. Adcock;A. M. McNeill;G. K. McDonald;R. D. Armstrong

  • Evaluating physicochemical constraints of Calcarosols on wheat yield in the Victorian southern Mallee

    J. G. Nuttall;R. D. Armstrong;D. J. Connor

  • Nitrogen dynamics in grain crop and legume pasture systems under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration: A meta-analysis

    Shu K. Lam;Deli Chen;Rob Norton;Roger Armstrong

  • Speciation and Distribution of Phosphorus in a Fertilized Soil

    E. Lombi;K. G. Scheckel;R. D. Armstrong;S. Forrester

  • Phosphorus supply enhances the response of legumes to elevated CO2 (FACE) in a phosphorus-deficient vertisol

    Jian Jin;Jian Jin;Caixian Tang;Roger Armstrong;Peter Sale

  • Effect of added nitrogen on plant litter decomposition depends on initial soil carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry

    Damien Finn;Kathryn Page;Kerrilyn Catton;Ekaterina Strounina

  • Long-term effects of elevated CO2 on carbon and nitrogen functional capacity of microbial communities in three contrasting soils

    Clayton R. Butterly;Lori A. Phillips;Jennifer L. Wiltshire;Ashley E. Franks

  • Carbon and nitrogen partitioning of wheat and field pea grown with two nitrogen levels under elevated CO2

    Clayton R. Butterly;Roger Armstrong;Deli Chen;Caixian Tang

  • The effect of soil water status on fertiliser, topsoil and subsoil phosphorus utilisation by wheat

    T. M. McBeath;T. M. McBeath;M. J. McLaughlin;M. J. McLaughlin;J. K. Kirby;R. D. Armstrong

  • Responsiveness of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to liquid and granular phosphorus fertilisers in southern Australian soils

    T. M. McBeath;R. D. Armstrong;E. Lombi;M. J. McLaughlin

  • Mobility, solubility and lability of fluid and granular forms of P fertiliser in calcareous and non-calcareous soils under laboratory conditions

    E. Lombi;M. J. McLaughlin;M. J. McLaughlin;C. Johnston;R. D. Armstrong

  • Impact of elevated CO2 on grain nutrient concentration varies with crops and soils - A long-term FACE study.

    Jian Jin;Roger Armstrong;Caixian Tang

  • Tillage system affects phosphorus form and depth distribution in three contrasting Victorian soils

    D. T. Vu;C. Tang;R. D. Armstrong

  • Interrelationships between edaphic factors potentially limiting cereal growth on alkaline soils in north-western Victoria.

    J. G. Nuttall;R. D. Armstrong;D. J. Connor;V. J. Matassa

  • Phosphorus speciation in mature wheat and canola plants as affected by phosphorus supply

    Sarah R. Noack;Mike J. McLaughlin;Mike J. McLaughlin;Ronald J. Smernik;Therese M. McBeath

  • Intercropping-Evaluating the Advantages to Broadacre Systems

    Uttam Khanal;Kerry J. Stott;Roger Armstrong;James G. Nuttall

  • Predicting the response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to liquid and granular phosphorus fertilisers in Australian soils

    T.M. McBeath;M.J. McLaughlin;M.J. McLaughlin;R.D. Armstrong;M. Bell

  • Changes in P bioavailability induced by the application of liquid and powder sources of P, N and Zn fertilizers in alkaline soils

    Isabelle Bertrand;Isabelle Bertrand;Mike J. McLaughlin;Mike J. McLaughlin;Robert E. Holloway;Roger D. Armstrong

  • Nutrient stoichiometry and labile carbon content of organic amendments control microbial biomass and carbon-use efficiency in a poorly structured sodic-subsoil

    Yunying Fang;Bhupinder Pal Singh;Damian Collins;Roger Armstrong

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Tausz
Michael Tausz University of Melbourne
Mike J. McLaughlin
Mike J. McLaughlin University of Adelaide
Caixian Tang
Caixian Tang La Trobe University
Glenn J. Fitzgerald
Glenn J. Fitzgerald University of Melbourne
Deli Chen
Deli Chen University of Melbourne
Jian Jin
Jian Jin Soochow University
Peter W. G. Sale
Peter W. G. Sale La Trobe University
Garry O'Leary
Garry O'Leary University of Melbourne
Enzo Lombi
Enzo Lombi University of South Australia
David J. Connor
David J. Connor University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Roger Armstrong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles