World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 127 2758 2572 1539 1415 537 99215

Richard I. Fisher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard I. Fisher between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard I. Fisher published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2023. 4 of the 590 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2023. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 7 publications 1979: 12 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 14 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 14 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 28 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 48 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1974 2025

590 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard I. Fisher: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 2
1977 3
1978 7
1979 12
1980 5
1981 14
1982 7
1983 7
1984 4
1985 7
1986 3
1987 3
1988 6
1989 12
1990 12
1991 12
1992 6
1993 9
1994 14
1995 9
1996 6
1997 8
1998 12
1999 5
2000 5
2001 11
2002 4
2003 15
2004 28
2005 22
2006 26
2007 27
2008 19
2009 19
2010 23
2011 21
2012 22
2013 20
2014 20
2015 12
2016 14
2017 9
2018 5
2019 18
2020 7
2021 2
2022 3
2023 48
2024 2
2025 2
Total 590
Download as CSV

Richard I. Fisher publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard I. Fisher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 537 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 537
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard I. Fisher D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard I. Fisher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 126–127 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 127 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252 127
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard I. Fisher is affiliated with Fox Chase Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Oncology. Subfields of study include Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Genetics.

The scientist has contributed to multiple topics within their discipline. These topics include:

  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
  • CAR-T cell therapy research

Recent publications by Richard I. Fisher highlight a range of cancer-related and clinical research topics. Notable papers include:

  • "A War on Two Fronts: Cancer Care in the Time of COVID-19," 2020, published in Annals of Internal Medicine
  • "Positron Emission Tomography-Directed Therapy for Patients With Limited-Stage Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results of Intergroup National Clinical Trials Network Study S1001," 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Improving Goal Concordant Care Among 10 Leading Academic U.S. Cancer Hospitals: A Collaboration of the Alliance of Dedicated Cancer Centers," 2021, The Oncologist
  • "Adverse Events Reported by Patients With Cancer After Administration of a 2-Dose mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine," 2022, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • "Outcomes of patients with blastoid and pleomorphic variant mantle cell lymphoma," 2023, Blood Advances

Frequent coauthors reflect ongoing collaborations across cancer research and oncology. These include:

  • Jonathan W. Friedberg (4 coauthored works)
  • Louis S. Constine (3)
  • Brad S. Kahl (3)
  • Michael LeBlanc (3)
  • Lisa M. Rimsza (3)

The scientist's work is regularly published in a select group of venues with repeated contributions to:

  • Blood
  • UNC Libraries
  • Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • The Oncologist

Best Publications

  • A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

    M. A. Shipp;D. P. Harrington;J. R. Anderson;J. O. Armitage

  • Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma

    Bruce D. Cheson;Beate Pfistner;Malik E. Juweid;Randy D. Gascoyne

  • Recommendations for Initial Evaluation, Staging, and Response Assessment of Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Lugano Classification

    Bruce D. Cheson;Richard I. Fisher;Sally F. Barrington;Franco Cavalli

  • The Use of Molecular Profiling to Predict Survival after Chemotherapy for Diffuse Large-B-Cell Lymphoma

    Andreas Rosenwald;George Wright;Wing C. Chan;Wing C. Chan;Joseph M. Connors

  • Report of an International Workshop to Standardize Response Criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas

    B D Cheson;S J Horning;B Coiffier;M A Shipp

  • Comparison of a Standard Regimen (CHOP) with Three Intensive Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

    Richard I. Fisher;Ellen R. Gaynor;Steve Dahlberg;Martin M. Oken

  • High-Dose Recombinant Interleukin 2 Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Melanoma: Analysis of 270 Patients Treated Between 1985 and 1993

    Michael B. Atkins;Michael T. Lotze;Janice P. Dutcher;Richard I. Fisher

  • Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index.

    Philippe Solal-Céligny;Pascal Roy;Philippe Colombat;Josephine White

  • Stromal gene signatures in large-B-cell lymphomas

    G Lenz;G Wright;S S Dave;W Xiao

  • Chronic active B-cell-receptor signalling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

    R. Eric Davis;Vu N. Ngo;Georg Lenz;Pavel Tolar

  • Oncogenically active MYD88 mutations in human lymphoma

    Vu N. Ngo;Vu N. Ngo;Ryan M. Young;Roland Schmitz;Sameer Jhavar

  • Rituximab-CHOP Versus CHOP Alone or With Maintenance Rituximab in Older Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

    Thomas M. Habermann;Edie A. Weller;Vicki A. Morrison;Randy D. Gascoyne

  • Prediction of survival in follicular lymphoma based on molecular features of tumor-infiltrating immune cells

    Sandeep S. Dave;George Wright;Bruce Tan;Andreas Rosenwald;Andreas Rosenwald

  • Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy.

    Gwendolyn Fyfe;Richard I. Fisher;Steven A. Rosenberg;Mario Sznol

  • Role of Imaging in the Staging and Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group

    Sally F. Barrington;N. George Mikhaeel;Lale Kostakoglu;Michel Meignan

  • Molecular Diagnosis of Primary Mediastinal B Cell Lymphoma Identifies a Clinically Favorable Subgroup of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Related to Hodgkin Lymphoma

    Andreas Rosenwald;George Wright;Karen Leroy;Xin-You Yu

  • Chemotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

    Thomas P. Miller;Steve Dahlberg;J. Robert Cassady;David J. Adelstein

  • Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma arise by distinct genetic pathways.

    Georg Lenz;George W. Wright;N. C.Tolga Emre;Holger Kohlhammer

  • The proliferation gene expression signature is a quantitative integrator of oncogenic events that predicts survival in mantle cell lymphoma

    Andreas Rosenwald;George Wright;Adrian Wiestner;Wing C. Chan;Wing C. Chan

  • Increased incidence of lymphoproliferative disorder after immunosuppression with the monoclonal antibody OKT3 in cardiac-transplant recipients.

    L J Swinnen;M R Costanzo-Nordin;S G Fisher;E J O'Sullivan;E J O'Sullivan

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan W. Friedberg
Jonathan W. Friedberg University of Rochester
Thomas P. Miller
Thomas P. Miller University of Arizona
Lisa M. Rimsza
Lisa M. Rimsza Mayo Clinic
Elaine S. Jaffe
Elaine S. Jaffe National Institutes of Health
Randy D. Gascoyne
Randy D. Gascoyne BC Cancer Agency
Oliver W. Press
Oliver W. Press University of Washington
Robert C. Young
Robert C. Young Cornell University
Joseph M. Connors
Joseph M. Connors University of British Columbia
David G. Maloney
David G. Maloney Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Elias Campo
Elias Campo University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine, a variety of online degrees open new doors to healthcare careers. Many choose to advance their education beyond the MD by exploring specialized and administrative roles.

For those passionate about mental health, online msn pmhnp programs prepare nurses for advanced psychiatric care positions with flexible, accelerated learning options.

Individuals interested in the management side of healthcare can pursue healthcare administration degrees entirely online. These programs cover business, policy, and leadership concepts, ideal for those aiming to influence healthcare delivery systems.

Graduate students seeking higher-level administrative roles can consider an affordable mha online, combining advanced managerial training with cost-effective tuition choices.

Nurses ready for leadership or academic positions may benefit from cheap online dnp programs. These provide a practical route to doctoral-level expertise without high costs.

Whether you are planning direct patient care, mental health specialization, or healthcare management, online pathways offer affordable and flexible options for every stage of your journey.

Best Scientists Citing Richard I. Fisher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles