World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
8830
World Ranking
6667
National Ranking
94

Guy Schurgers publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Schurgers sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 130 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Guy Schurgers D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Schurgers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guy Schurgers is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a strong emphasis on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, and Atmospheric Science. Other subfields they explore include Environmental Chemistry and Water Science and Technology.

The main topics of their work cover Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Climate Change and Permafrost, Climate Variability and Models, Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, and Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics.

Schurgers has contributed to numerous scholarly articles published in a variety of scientific journals. Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Biogeosciences
  • Global Change Biology
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Communications Earth & Environment
  • One Earth

Their recent papers include:

  • "Eutrophication changes in fifty large lakes on the Yangtze Plain of China derived from MERIS and OLCI observations," 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "Recent divergence in the contributions of tropical and boreal forests to the terrestrial carbon sink," 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "Modelling past and future peatland carbon dynamics across the pan-Arctic," 2020, Global Change Biology
  • "Separating direct and indirect effects of rising temperatures on biogenic volatile emissions in the Arctic," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "A physiology-based Earth observation model indicates stagnation in the global gross primary production during recent decades," 2020, Global Change Biology

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations include:

  • Jing Tang
  • Stéphanie Horion
  • Stefan Olin
  • Rasmus Fensholt
  • Torbern Tagesson

Best Publications

  • The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink

    Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström;Michael R. Raupach;Guy Schurgers;Benjamin Smith

  • Increased vegetation growth and carbon stock in China karst via ecological engineering

    Xiaowei Tong;Martin Brandt;Yuemin Yue;Stephanie Horion

  • Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in the climate system

    Almut Arneth;S. P. Harrison;S. P. Harrison;S. Zaehle;K. Tsigaridis;K. Tsigaridis

  • Why are estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions so similar (and why is this not so for monoterpenes)

    Almut Arneth;R. K. Monson;Guy Schurgers;Ue. Niinemets

  • Robustness and uncertainty in terrestrial ecosystem carbon response to CMIP5 climate change projections

    Anders Ahlström;Guy Schurgers;Almut Arneth;Benjamin Smith

  • Satellite passive microwaves reveal recent climate-induced carbon losses in African drylands.

    Martin Brandt;Jean-Pierre Wigneron;Jérôme Chave;Torbern Tagesson

  • Human population growth offsets climate-driven increase in woody vegetation in sub-Saharan Africa

    Martin Brandt;Kjeld Rasmussen;Josep Peñuelas;Feng Tian

  • Eutrophication changes in fifty large lakes on the Yangtze Plain of China derived from MERIS and OLCI observations

    Qi Guan;Qi Guan;Lian Feng;Xuejiao Hou;Guy Schurgers

  • Global terrestrial isoprene emission models: Sensitivity to variability in climate and vegetation

    Almut Arneth;Almut Arneth;Guy Schurgers;J. Lathiere;T. Duhl

  • Recent divergence in the contributions of tropical and boreal forests to the terrestrial carbon sink

    Torbern Tagesson;Guy Schurgers;Stéphanie Horion;Philippe Ciais

  • Global isoprene and monoterpene emissions under changing climate, vegetation, CO 2 and land use

    Stijn Hantson;Wolfgang Knorr;Guy Schurgers;Thomas Alan Miller Pugh;Thomas Alan Miller Pugh

  • CO2 inhibition of global terrestrial isoprene emissions: Potential implications for atmospheric chemistry

    Almut Arneth;Paul A. Miller;Marko Scholze;Thomas Hickler

  • Future changes in the Baltic Sea acid-base (pH) and oxygen balances

    Anders Omstedt;Moa Edman;Björn Claremar;Peter Frodin

  • Long-term effects of anthropogenic CO2 emissions simulated with a complex earth system model

    Uwe Mikolajewicz;Matthias Gröger;Ernst Maier-Reimer;Guy Schurgers;Guy Schurgers

  • Evaluation of a photosynthesis-based biogenic isoprene emission scheme in JULES and simulation of isoprene emissions under present-day climate conditions

    F. Pacifico;F. Pacifico;F. Pacifico;S. P. Harrison;S. P. Harrison;C. D. Jones;Almut Arneth

  • Process-based modelling of biogenic monoterpene emissions combining production and release from storage

    Guy Schurgers;Almut Arneth;Almut Arneth;R. Holzinger;A. H. Goldstein

  • The CO2 inhibition of terrestrial isoprene emission significantly affects future ozone projections

    P. J. Young;P. J. Young;A. Arneth;A. Arneth;G. Schurgers;Guang Zeng;Guang Zeng

  • Climate modification by future ice sheet changes and consequences for ice sheet mass balance

    M. Vizcaino;U. Mikolajewicz;J. Jungclaus;Guy Schurgers

  • Long-term ice sheet-climate interactions under anthropogenic greenhouse forcing simulated with a complex earth system model

    Miren Vizcaíno;Miren Vizcaíno;Uwe Mikolajewicz;Matthias Gröger;Ernst Maier-Reimer

  • Simulated carbon emissions from land-use change are substantially enhanced by accounting for agricultural management

    T. A. M. Pugh;A. Arneth;Stefan Olin;Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström

  • Photosynthesis-dependent isoprene emission from leaf to planet in a global carbon-chemistry-climate model

    N. Unger;K. Harper;Y. Zheng;N. Y. Kiang

Frequent Co-Authors

Almut Arneth
Almut Arneth Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Anders Ahlström
Anders Ahlström Lund University
Uwe Mikolajewicz
Uwe Mikolajewicz Max Planck Society
Thomas Hickler
Thomas Hickler Goethe University Frankfurt
Riikka Rinnan
Riikka Rinnan University of Copenhagen
Rasmus Fensholt
Rasmus Fensholt University of Copenhagen
Stefan Olin
Stefan Olin Lund University
Ernst Maier-Reimer
Ernst Maier-Reimer Max Planck Society
Thomas A. M. Pugh
Thomas A. M. Pugh University of Birmingham
Erik Swietlicki
Erik Swietlicki Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. Geology is a core discipline closely linked to environmental studies, and there are several quality geology degrees online that provide strong foundations in earth sciences and natural resource management.

Another complementary field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which plays a crucial role in environmental data analysis and mapping. The best GIS undergraduate programs offer specialized training in spatial data technologies, essential for careers in environmental planning and conservation.

Additionally, public administration knowledge is valuable for those aiming to work on environmental policies and sustainable development projects. Pursuing the best online MPA programs can equip students with leadership and management skills tailored to public sector roles addressing environmental challenges.

Lastly, understanding social dynamics through a sociology bachelor degree online can enhance a professional’s ability to work on environmental justice and community engagement initiatives. Integrating social sciences with environmental knowledge leads to more holistic and impactful solutions.

Exploring these related academic paths can significantly broaden career opportunities and equip students with a versatile skill set applicable to various environmental roles.

Learn more about geology degrees online, the best GIS undergraduate programs, the best online MPA, and the sociology bachelor degree online.

Best Scientists Citing Guy Schurgers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles