World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anders Ahlström

Anders Ahlström

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 40 7901 7593 150 147 85 12625

Anders Ahlström publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anders Ahlström between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anders Ahlström published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2017. 6 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2017. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
2006 2025

105 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anders Ahlström: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 2
2012 3
2013 9
2014 4
2015 13
2016 7
2017 15
2018 9
2019 3
2020 5
2021 4
2022 15
2023 8
2024 3
2025 3
Total 105
Download as CSV

Anders Ahlström publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anders Ahlström sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 85 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 85
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Anders Ahlström D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anders Ahlström sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321 40
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Anders Ahlström is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and has a research focus within Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science, and Insect Science.

Themes central to their research include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Climate variability and models, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies, Forest Management and Policy, Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology.

They have contributed to multiple recent papers, including:

  • Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation, 2020, Nature Geoscience
  • Global stocks and capacity of mineral-associated soil organic carbon, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Recent divergence in the contributions of tropical and boreal forests to the terrestrial carbon sink, 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Emergent temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon driven by mineral associations, 2024, Nature Geoscience
  • A physiology-based Earth observation model indicates stagnation in the global gross primary production during recent decades, 2020, Global Change Biology

Frequent coauthors in their research include:

  • Robert B. Jackson
  • Adam F. A. Pellegrini
  • Katerina Georgiou
  • Rose Abramoff
  • W. J. Riley

They have published repeatedly in specific venues, with multiple publications in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Environmental Research Letters, Nature Geoscience, Global and Planetary Change, and Geophysical Research Letters.

Best Publications

  • The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink

    Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström;Michael R. Raupach;Guy Schurgers;Benjamin Smith

  • Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation

    Enzai Du;Enzai Du;César Terrer;César Terrer;Adam F. A. Pellegrini;Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström

  • Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide

    S. Sitch;P. Friedlingstein;N. Gruber;S. D. Jones

  • Global stocks and capacity of mineral-associated soil organic carbon

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends.

    Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Stephen Sitch;Philippe Ciais;Pierre Friedlingstein

  • The global carbon budget 1959-2011

    C. Le Quere;R.J. Andres;T.A. Boden;T. Conway

  • Compensatory water effects link yearly global land CO2 sink changes to temperature

    Martin Jung;Markus Reichstein;Christopher R. Schwalm;Christopher Huntingford

  • Evidence for a weakening relationship between interannual temperature variability and northern vegetation activity

    Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Huijuan Nan;Chris Huntingford;Philippe Ciais

  • Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models

    Yiqi Luo;Yiqi Luo;Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström;Steven D. Allison;Niels H. Batjes

  • Fire frequency drives decadal changes in soil carbon and nitrogen and ecosystem productivity

    Adam F. A. Pellegrini;Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström;Sarah E. Hobbie;Peter B. Reich;Peter B. Reich

  • Water-use efficiency and transpiration across European forests during the Anthropocene

    D. C. Frank;B. Poulter;M. Saurer;J. Esper

  • Robustness and uncertainty in terrestrial ecosystem carbon response to CMIP5 climate change projections

    Anders Ahlström;Guy Schurgers;Almut Arneth;Benjamin Smith

  • Enhanced peak growth of global vegetation and its key mechanisms.

    Kun Huang;Jianyang Xia;Yingping Wang;Yingping Wang;Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström

  • Weakening temperature control on the interannual variations of spring carbon uptake across northern lands

    Shilong Piao;Shilong Piao;Zhuo Liu;Tao Wang;Shushi Peng

  • Recent divergence in the contributions of tropical and boreal forests to the terrestrial carbon sink

    Torbern Tagesson;Guy Schurgers;Stéphanie Horion;Philippe Ciais

  • Patchy field sampling biases understanding of climate change impacts across the Arctic

    Daniel B. Metcalfe;Thirze D. G. Hermans;Jenny Ahlstrand;Michael Becker

  • Networking our science to characterize the state, vulnerabilities, and management opportunities of soil organic matter

    Jennifer W. Harden;Jennifer W. Harden;Gustaf Hugelius;Gustaf Hugelius;Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström;Joseph C. Blankinship

  • The carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems in East Asia over the last two decades

    S. L. Piao;S. L. Piao;A. Ito;S. G. Li;Y. Huang

  • Carbon cycle uncertainty in the Alaskan Arctic

    J. B. Fisher;M. Sikka;W. C. Oechel;D. N. Huntzinger

  • Simulated carbon emissions from land-use change are substantially enhanced by accounting for agricultural management

    T. A. M. Pugh;A. Arneth;Stefan Olin;Anders Ahlström;Anders Ahlström

  • Evaluation of land surface models in reproducing satellite-derived LAI over the high-latitude Northern Hemisphere : Part I: Uncoupled DGVMs

    Guillermo Murray-Tortarolo;Alessandro Anav;Pierre Friedlingstein;Stephen Sitch

  • Weakening temperature control on the interannual variations of spring carbon uptake across northern lands

    S. Piao;S. Peng;Z. Liu;P. Ciais

Frequent Co-Authors

Yiqi Luo
Yiqi Luo Cornell University
Stephen Sitch
Stephen Sitch University of Exeter
Nicolas Viovy
Nicolas Viovy French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)
Chris Huntingford
Chris Huntingford Natural Environment Research Council
Peter E. Levy
Peter E. Levy University of Edinburgh
Shilong Piao
Shilong Piao Peking University
Ning Zeng
Ning Zeng University of Maryland, College Park
Guy Schurgers
Guy Schurgers University of Copenhagen
Pierre Friedlingstein
Pierre Friedlingstein University of Exeter
Benjamin Poulter
Benjamin Poulter Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields through online education can open diverse career pathways. Degrees such as a best online sociology bachelor degree provide valuable insights into human behavior and societal trends, complementing environmental studies by addressing the social dimensions of environmental issues.

For advanced practitioners, pursuing a doctoral degree can deepen expertise and leadership opportunities. Options like 1 year phd programs online no dissertation offer accelerated paths that accommodate working professionals seeking to advance quickly without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Educators aiming to specialize in environmental education or policy might consider programs ranked among the best eds to edd programs, which emphasize leadership and applied research, equipping graduates to influence environmental curricula and community programs effectively.

Social workers interested in environmental justice can enhance their qualifications through the cheapest online dsw programs, merging social work expertise with sustainability initiatives to advocate for marginalized communities affected by environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Anders Ahlström

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles