World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Chemistry
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
90
Citations
30396
World Ranking
281
National Ranking
27

Chemistry

D-Index
86
Citations
26094
World Ranking
2541
National Ranking
71

Enzo Lombi publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enzo Lombi sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 267 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Enzo Lombi D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Enzo Lombi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Chemistry in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Chemistry in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Enzo Lombi is affiliated with the University of South Australia in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on environmental sciences and agricultural biological sciences, as reflected by a substantial number of publications in these fields. Lombi has contributed notably to the understanding of soil and water nutrient dynamics, plant micronutrient interactions, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and heavy metals in the environment.

The main fields of study covered by their work include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these fields, key subfields of their research are:

  • Plant Science
  • Pollution
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Soil Science

Lombi's work addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Phosphorus and nutrient management
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Radioactive element chemistry and processing

The scientist has published frequently in these venues:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Geoderma
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Chemosphere

Frequent collaborators associated with Enzo Lombi's research include:

  • Casey L. Doolette
  • Peter M. Kopittke
  • Gianluca Brunetti
  • Barbara Drigo
  • Brigid A. McKenna

Some of the recent papers featuring Lombi's work are:

  • Probing the nature of soil organic matter (2021), published in Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
  • Chemical Speciation and Distribution of Cadmium in Rice Grain and Implications for Bioavailability to Humans (2020), published in Environmental Science & Technology
  • Cellular binding, uptake and biotransformation of silver nanoparticles in human T lymphocytes (2021), published in Nature Nanotechnology
  • Insights into the fate of antimony (Sb) in contaminated soils: Ageing influence on Sb mobility, bioavailability, bioaccessibility and speciation (2021), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Use of X-ray tomography for examining root architecture in soils (2021), published in Geoderma

Best Publications

  • Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure

    Walter W Wenzel;Natalie Kirchbaumer;Thomas Prohaska;Gerhard Stingeder

  • Soil and the intensification of agriculture for global food security.

    Peter M. Kopittke;Neal W. Menzies;Peng Wang;Brigid A. McKenna

  • Nanotechnology: A New Opportunity in Plant Sciences

    Peng Wang;Peng Wang;Enzo Lombi;Fang-Jie Zhao;Peter M. Kopittke

  • Cellular compartmentation of cadmium and zinc in relation to other elements in the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri.

    Hendrik Küpper;Enzo Lombi;Fang Jie Zhao;Steve P. McGrath

  • Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils: natural hyperaccumulation versus chemically enhanced phytoextraction.

    E. Lombi;F.J. Zhao;S.J. Dunham;S.P. McGrath

  • Plant and rhizosphere processes involved in phytoremediation of metal-contaminated soils

    S. P. McGrath;F. J. Zhao;E. Lombi

  • Leaching of heavy metals from contaminated soils using EDTA

    B Sun;F.J Zhao;E Lombi;S.P McGrath

  • Phytoremediation of metals, metalloids, and radionuclides

    McGrath Sp;Zhao Fj;Lombi E

  • Assessing the potential for zinc and cadmium phytoremediation with the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens

    F.J. Zhao;E. Lombi;S.P. McGrath

  • Cadmium accumulation in populations of Thlaspi caerulescens and Thlaspi goesingense

    E. Lombi;F. J. Zhao;S. J. Dunham;S. P. McGRATH

  • Nanoparticle Size and Coating Chemistry Control Foliar Uptake Pathways, Translocation, and Leaf-to-Rhizosphere Transport in Wheat

    Astrid Avellan;Jie Yun;Yilin Zhang;Eleanor Spielman-Sun

  • In situ fixation of metals in soils using bauxite residue: chemical assessment

    Enzo Lombi;Fang-Jie Zhao;Gangya Zhang;Bo Sun

  • Characteristics of cadmium uptake in two contrasting ecotypes of the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens

    Fang‐Jie Zhao;Rebecca E. Hamon;Enzo Lombi;Mike J. McLaughlin

  • Constitutive Overexpression of the OsNAS Gene Family Reveals Single-Gene Strategies for Effective Iron- and Zinc-Biofortification of Rice Endosperm

    Alexander A. T. Johnson;Alexander A. T. Johnson;Bianca Kyriacou;Bianca Kyriacou;Damien L. Callahan;Lorraine Carruthers

  • Cellular compartmentation of nickel in the hyperaccumulators Alyssum lesbiacum, Alyssum bertolonii and Thlaspi goesingense

    Hendrik Küpper;Enzo Lombi;Fang Jie Zhao;Gerlinde Wieshammer

  • Zinc hyperaccumulation and cellular distribution in Arabidopsis halleri

    F. J. Zhao;E. Lombi;T. Breedon;S. P. McGrath

  • Speciation and Localization of Arsenic in White and Brown Rice Grains

    Andrew A. Meharg;Enzo Lombi;Paul N. Williams;Kirk G. Scheckel

  • Influence of Iron Status on Cadmium and Zinc Uptake by Different Ecotypes of the Hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens

    Enzo Lombi;Kathryn L. Tearall;Jonathan R. Howarth;Fang-Jie Zhao

  • Arsenic distribution and speciation in the fronds of the hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata

    Enzo Lombi;Fang‐Jie Zhao;Mark Fuhrmann;Lena Q. Ma

  • Field evaluation of Cd and Zn phytoextraction potential by the hyperaccumulators Thlaspi caerulescens and Arabidopsis halleri.

    S.P. McGrath;E. Lombi;C.W. Gray;N. Caille

  • Physiological evidence for a high-affinity cadmium transporter highly expressed in a Thlaspi caerulescens ecotype

    E. Lombi;F. J. Zhao;S. P. McGrath;S. D. Young

  • An inter-laboratory study to test the ability of amendments to reduce the availability of Cd, Pb, and Zn in situ.

    Sally Brown;Barbara Christensen;Enzo Lombi;Mike McLaughlin

  • Plant and rhizosphere processes involved in phytoremediation of metal-contaminated soils.

    S. P. McGrath;F. J. Zhao;E. Lombi;D. S. Powlson

Frequent Co-Authors

Erica Donner
Erica Donner University of South Australia
Mike J. McLaughlin
Mike J. McLaughlin University of Adelaide
Peter M. Kopittke
Peter M. Kopittke University of Queensland
Steve P. McGrath
Steve P. McGrath Rothamsted Research
Kirk G. Scheckel
Kirk G. Scheckel Environmental Protection Agency
Fang-Jie Zhao
Fang-Jie Zhao Nanjing Agricultural University
Neal W. Menzies
Neal W. Menzies Griffith University
Ravi Naidu
Ravi Naidu University of Newcastle Australia
Nicolas H. Voelcker
Nicolas H. Voelcker Monash University
Søren Husted
Søren Husted University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Enzo Lombi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles