World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
6422
World Ranking
6186
National Ranking
267

Laurier Poissant publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurier Poissant sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 96 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Laurier Poissant D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurier Poissant sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurier Poissant is affiliated with Environment and Climate Change Canada, a federal institution in Canada focused on environmental policy, science, and stewardship. Their work is situated within a context of governmental scientific research aimed at addressing climate and environmental challenges.

Laurier Poissant's scholarly record does not include recent publications or listed frequent co-authors, which indicates limited publicly available data on collaborative research or ongoing projects at this time.

There are no recorded publication venues or recurrent outlets associated with their research profile, suggesting either a focus on internal reports, governmental documents, or contributions that may not be extensively cataloged in common academic databases.

Similarly, there is no specific information on books authored or published by Laurier Poissant through recognized academic or commercial publishers.

Their academic and research expertise does not have detailed entries listing main fields of study, subfields, or primary topics of work. This absence implies that either the specialization is highly focused on niche governmental projects, or detailed classification is not available through the current data sources.

Laurier Poissant has not been noted to have received any awards according to available records, nor is there any indication of passing, indicating an active status.

Best Publications

  • Water-air and soil-air exchange rate of total gaseous mercury measured at background sites

    Laurier Poissant;Alain Casimir

  • A year of continuous measurements of three atmospheric mercury species (GEM, RGM and Hgp) in southern Québec, Canada

    Laurier Poissant;Martin Pilote;Conrad Beauvais;Philippe Constant

  • Nevada STORMS project: Measurement of mercury emissions from naturally enriched surfaces

    M. Sexauer Gustin;S. Lindberg;F. Marsik;A. Casimir

  • Estimation and mapping of wet and dry mercury deposition across northeastern North America.

    Eric K. Miller;Alan Vanarsdale;Gerald J. Keeler;Ann Chalmers

  • Modeling the atmospheric transport and deposition of mercury to the Great Lakes.

    Mark Cohen;Richard Artz;Roland Draxler;Paul Miller

  • Mercury in the Arctic atmosphere: an analysis of eight years of measurements of GEM at Alert (Canada) and a comparison with observations at Amderma (Russia) and Kuujjuarapik (Canada).

    Alexandra Steffen;William Schroeder;Rob Macdonald;Laurier Poissant

  • Temporal and spatial variability of total gaseous mercury in Canada : Results from the Canadian Atmospheric Mercury Measurement Network (CAMNet)

    Markus Kellerhals;Stephen Beauchamp;Wayne Belzer;Pierrette Blanchard

  • Mercury Water−Air Exchange over the Upper St. Lawrence River and Lake Ontario

    Laurier Poissant;Marc Amyot;Martin Pilote;David Lean

  • Increases in mercury emissions from desert soils in response to rainfall and irrigation

    S. E. Lindberg;H. Zhang;M. Gustin;A. Vette

  • Spatial and temporal distribution of pesticide air concentrations in Canadian agricultural regions

    Yuan Yao;Ludovic Tuduri;Tom Harner;Pierrette Blanchard

  • Atmospheric mercury speciation and deposition in the Bay St. François wetlands

    Laurier Poissant;Martin Pilote;Xiaohong Xu;Hong Zhang

  • Trend, seasonal and multivariate analysis study of total gaseous mercury data from the Canadian atmospheric mercury measurement network (CAMNet)

    Christian Temme;P. Blanchard;A. Steffen;C. Banic

  • The fate of mercury species in a sub-arctic snowpack during snowmelt

    Aurélien Dommergue;Christophe P. Ferrari;Pierre-Alexis Gauchard;Claude F. Boutron

  • The fate of mercury in Arctic terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, a review

    Thomas A. Douglas;Lisa L. Loseto;Robie W. Macdonald;Peter Outridge

  • Methylated mercury species in marine waters of the Canadian high and sub Arctic.

    Jane L. Kirk;Vincent L. St. Louis;Holger Hintelmann;Igor Lehnherr

  • Pesticides in the atmosphere across Canadian agricultural regions.

    Yuan Yao;Tom Harner;Pierrette Blanchard;Ludovic Tuduri

  • Trace inorganic elements in rainfall in the Montreal Island

    Laurier Poissant;Jean-Pierre Schmit;Patrick Béron

  • Critical review of mercury fates and contamination in the Arctic tundra ecosystem.

    Laurier Poissant;Hong H. Zhang;João Canário;Philippe Constant

  • Ten-year trends of atmospheric mercury in the high Arctic compared to Canadian sub-Arctic and mid-latitude sites

    A. S. Cole;A. Steffen;K. A. Pfaffhuber;T. Berg

  • Distribution and transformation of elemental mercury in the St. Lawrence River and Lake Ontario

    Marc Amyot;David R.S. Lean;Laurier Poissant;Marie-Renée Doyon

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. S. Lean
David R. S. Lean University of Ottawa
Claude F. Boutron
Claude F. Boutron Grenoble Alpes University
Christophe Ferrari
Christophe Ferrari Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur
João Canário
João Canário Instituto Superior Técnico
Aurélien Dommergue
Aurélien Dommergue Grenoble Alpes University
Pierrette Blanchard
Pierrette Blanchard Environment and Climate Change Canada
Marc Amyot
Marc Amyot University of Montreal
Alexandra Steffen
Alexandra Steffen Environment and Climate Change Canada
Yi-Fan Li
Yi-Fan Li Harbin Institute of Technology
Tom Harner
Tom Harner Environment and Climate Change Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, online degree programs offer flexible pathways to advance or pivot your career. Many educators and professionals explore online eds to edd programs to deepen their knowledge and leadership skills in education and environmental policy.

Social work intersects significantly with environmental issues, especially in community wellness and advocacy. If you wish to integrate social sciences with environmental work, fully funded fully funded dsw programs online present valuable opportunities to earn advanced qualifications without excessive financial strain.

For students seeking a broad-based education that can still support environmental careers, affordable options are plentiful. The best affordable online general studies degree programs cultivate versatile knowledge, making them a good fit for those who want interdisciplinary skills.

Additionally, if you are beginning your higher education journey and looking for manageable entry points, understanding what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help you select a degree program that fits your learning style and goals while setting the stage for environmental sciences specialization.

Best Scientists Citing Laurier Poissant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles