World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
23258
World Ranking
16188
National Ranking
541

Tristan D. Yan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tristan D. Yan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 428 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Tristan D. Yan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tristan D. Yan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tristan D. Yan is primarily affiliated with Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Australia. Their academic work focuses on the field of Medicine, with specific contributions to cardiology, pulmonary medicine, surgery, epidemiology, and pathology.

Their research covers several key subfields of study:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Epidemiology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

The main topics explored in their publications include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases

Tristan D. Yan has contributed to a number of recent research articles, primarily published in notable academic venues:

  • Long-term outcomes of the frozen elephant trunk procedure: a systematic review, 2020, Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery
  • Sutureless and rapid deployment implantation in bicuspid aortic valve: results from the sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement international registry, 2020, Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery
  • Robotic versus conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery
  • Ex-vivo lung perfusion versus standard protocol lung transplantation-mid-term survival and meta-analysis, 2020, Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery
  • Pleural effusion post coronary artery bypass surgery: associations and complications, 2021, Journal of Thoracic Disease

The frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery
  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • ASVIDE
  • Journal of Thoracic Disease
  • Journal of Surgical Case Reports

Collaborations play a significant role in their research output. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Martín Misfeld
  • Ashley R. Wilson-Smith
  • Michael L. Williams
  • Bridget Hwang
  • Aditya Eranki

Best Publications

  • Early- and Long-Term Outcome Data of Patients With Pseudomyxoma Peritonei From Appendiceal Origin Treated by a Strategy of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

    Terence C. Chua;Brendan J. Moran;Paul H. Sugarbaker;Edward A. Levine

  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Nonrandomized Trials on Safety and Efficacy of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Tristan D. Yan;Deborah Black;Deborah Black;Paul G. Bannon;Paul G. Bannon;Brian C. McCaughan;Brian C. McCaughan

  • Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Multi-Institutional Experience

    Tristan D. Yan;Marcello Deraco;Dario Baratti;Shigeki Kusamura

  • Should the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis by Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Still be Regarded as a Highly Morbid Procedure?: A Systematic Review of Morbidity and Mortality

    Terence C. Chua;Tristan D. Yan;Akshat Saxena;David L. Morris

  • Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies of Colonic Origin: A Consensus Statement

    J. Esquivel;R. Sticca;P. Sugarbaker;E. Levine

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials on Adjuvant Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer

    Tristan D. Yan;Tristan D. Yan;Deborah Black;Paul H. Sugarbaker;Jacqui Zhu

  • Systematic Review on the Efficacy of Cytoreductive Surgery Combined With Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Colorectal Carcinoma

    Tristan D. Yan;Deborah Black;Renaldo Savady;Paul H. Sugarbaker

  • Evaluation of preoperative computed tomography in estimating peritoneal cancer index in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis.

    Ju Li Koh;Tristan D. Yan;Derek Glenn;David L. Morris

  • A systematic review on the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for diffuse malignancy peritoneal mesothelioma

    T. D. Yan;L. Welch;D. Black;Paul H. Sugarbaker

  • A systematic review on the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei.

    Tristan D. Yan;Deborah Black;Renaldo Savady;Paul H. Sugarbaker

  • National Heart Foundation of Australia and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation 2018

    David Brieger;John Amerena;John Attia

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cytoreductive Surgery with Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Colorectal Origin

    Christopher Cao;Tristan D. Yan;Deborah Black;David L. Morris

  • Consensus statement on the loco-regional treatment of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms with peritoneal dissemination (pseudomyxoma peritonei)

    Brendan Moran;Dario Baratti;Tristan D. Yan;Shigeki Kusamura

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical treatments for malignant pleural mesothelioma

    Christopher Cao;Christopher Cao;David Tian;John Park;James Allan

  • Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy at 20 years: A consensus statement

    Tristan D. Yan;Christopher Cao;Thomas A. D'Amico;Todd L. Demmy

  • Intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy after cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review of current results.

    Terence C. Chua;Greg Robertson;Winston Liauw;Rhonda Farrell

  • A Systematic Review of Radiofrequency Ablation for Lung Tumors

    Jacqui C. Zhu;Tristan D. Yan;David L. Morris

  • Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched patients.

    Christopher Cao;Con Manganas;Su C. Ang;Sheen Peeceeyen

  • A Meta-Analysis of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Sternotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement

    Kevin Phan;Ashleigh Xie;Marco Di Eusanio;Marco Di Eusanio;Tristan D. Yan;Tristan D. Yan

  • Erratum: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancies of colonic origin: A consensus statement (Annals of Surgical Oncology 14 (128-133)DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9185-7)

    J. Esquivel;R. Sticca;P. Sugarbaker;E. Levine

Frequent Co-Authors

David L. Morris
David L. Morris University of New South Wales
Paul H. Sugarbaker
Paul H. Sugarbaker MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Thierry Carrel
Thierry Carrel University of Bern
Edward A. Levine
Edward A. Levine Wake Forest University
Friedrich W. Mohr
Friedrich W. Mohr Leipzig University
Dominique Elias
Dominique Elias Institut Gustave Roussy
Joseph S. Coselli
Joseph S. Coselli Baylor College of Medicine
Joseph E. Bavaria
Joseph E. Bavaria University of Pennsylvania
Scott A. LeMaire
Scott A. LeMaire Baylor College of Medicine
Brendan J. Moran
Brendan J. Moran University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up many alternative pathways in healthcare. Online nursing and advanced practice degrees are increasingly popular for students looking for flexible, affordable options.

If you’re considering becoming a nurse practitioner, there are many cheapest online nurse practitioner programs that combine rigorous coursework with scheduling flexibility. These programs prepare students for advanced clinical roles and can lead to higher earning potential in a variety of healthcare settings.

For registered nurses aiming to achieve a bachelor’s degree, the cheapest rn to bsn online options make it possible to further education while working. Advancing from RN to BSN opens new opportunities for leadership and specialization.

Those wanting to pursue research, teaching, or leadership positions in nursing might consider an online phd in nursing. These doctoral programs focus on evidence-based practice, research, and policy development in healthcare.

There are also opportunities to earn your degree at a lower cost, such as the cheapest rn to bsn program online. These accessible pathways allow more students to progress in their nursing careers and help address the ongoing demand for skilled healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Tristan D. Yan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles