World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
12864
World Ranking
4942
National Ranking
2716

Byron Reeves publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Byron Reeves sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 99 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Byron Reeves D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Byron Reeves sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Byron Reeves is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and works primarily in the field of Social Sciences. Their research spans subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Communication, Literature and Literary Theory, and Social Psychology.

Their work covers several main topics, notably:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Image and Video Quality Assessment

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Reeves are:

  • "Time for the Human Screenome Project," 2020, Nature
  • "Social robots are like real people: First impressions, attributes, and stereotyping of social robots," 2020, Technology Mind and Behavior

Reeves has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Nilàm Ram
  • Thomas N. Robinson
  • Mu-Jung Cho
  • Jeffrey T. Hancock
  • Daniel Muise

Their publications are often featured in venues such as:

  • Technology Mind and Behavior
  • Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Nature

Best Publications

  • The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust

    Diana C. Mutz;Byron Reeves

  • Can computer personalities be human personalities

    Clifford Nass;Youngme Moon;B. J. Fogg;Byron Reeves

  • Negative video as structure: Emotion, attention, capacity, and memory

    Annie Lang;John Newhagen;Byron Reeves

  • The Evening's Bad News: Effects of Compelling Negative Television News Images on Memory

    John E. Newhagen;Byron Reeves

  • Learning Theories and Education: Toward a Decade of Synergy

    John Bransford;Reed Stevens;Dan Schwartz;Andy Meltzoff

  • Total Engagement: Using Games and Virtual Worlds to Change the Way People Work and Businesses Compete

    Byron Reeves;J. Leighton Read

  • The Effects of Screen Size and Message Content on Attention and Arousal

    Byron Reeves;Annie Lang;Eun Young Kim;Deborah Tatar

  • Historical Trends in Research on Children and the Media: 1900–1960

    Ellen Wartella;Byron Reeves

  • A Bio‐Informational Theory of Emotion: Motion and Image Size Effects on Viewers

    Benjamin H. Detenber;Byron Reeves

  • The effects of animated characters on anxiety, task performance, and evaluations of user interfaces

    Raoul Rickenberg;Byron Reeves

  • Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player

    Sohye Lim;Byron Reeves

  • Attention to television: intrastimulus effects of movement and scene changes on alpha variation over time.

    Byron Reeves;Esther Thorson;Michael L. Rothschild;Daniel McDonald

  • Multitasking on a Single Device: Arousal and the Frequency, Anticipation, and Prediction of Switching Between Media Content on a Computer

    Leo Yeykelis;James J. Cummings;Byron Reeves

  • Investigating the Assumptions of Uses and Gratifications Research

    Guy E. Lometti;Byron Reeves;Carl R. Bybee

  • Foundations and opportunities for an interdisciplinary science of learning

    John D. Bransford;Brigid Barron;Roy D. Pea;Andrew Meltzoff

  • LEADERSHIP'S Online Labs

    Byron Reeves;Thomas W. Malone;Tony O'driscoll

  • MESSAGE COMPLEXITY AND ATTENTION TO TELEVISION

    Esther Thorson;Byron Reeves;Joan Schleuder

  • Citation Networks of Communication Journals, 1977–1985 Cliques and Positions, Citations Made and Citations Received

    Ronald E. Rice;Christine L. Borgman;Byron Reeves

  • Children and the Perceived Reality of Television

    Bradley S. Greenberg;Byron Reeves

  • The Use of Media in Media Psychology

    Byron Reeves;Leo Yeykelis;James J. Cummings

  • Social Cognition and Communication

    B Reeves;S H Chaffee;Albert R Tims

Frequent Co-Authors

Clifford Nass
Clifford Nass Stanford University
Nilam Ram
Nilam Ram Stanford University
Thomas N. Robinson
Thomas N. Robinson University of Colorado Denver
Esther Thorson
Esther Thorson Michigan State University
Jeffrey T. Hancock
Jeffrey T. Hancock Stanford University
Jeremy N. Bailenson
Jeremy N. Bailenson Stanford University
C. Lee Giles
C. Lee Giles Pennsylvania State University
Michael Rothschild
Michael Rothschild University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ellen Wartella
Ellen Wartella Northwestern University
Roy D. Pea
Roy D. Pea Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology graduates have a diverse array of online degree options and specialized career pathways, particularly in fields such as speech-language pathology and therapy. Choosing to pursue advanced study in speech-language pathology can unlock rewarding roles in healthcare, schools, and private practice.

Each state has unique licensure and educational requirements. For instance, those interested in working in New England can review Maine slp certification requirements or explore the details of Massachusetts speech pathologist certification requirements. These guides outline everything from degree prerequisites to required supervised clinical hours.

Similarly, aspiring professionals in the Mid-Atlantic region can look into becoming a speech therapist in Maryland, while those interested in the Midwest can check out slp requirements in Michigan. Each pathway emphasizes accredited education, practical experience, and state-level certification.

Researching these requirements ensures you select a degree program that fits your career goals and prepares you well for licensure in your chosen state.

Best Scientists Citing Byron Reeves

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles