World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3352 3087 151 148 316 16047

Nicole C. Krämer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicole C. Krämer between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicole C. Krämer published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 16 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2011. 30 of the 431 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2011. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 17 publications
1999 2025

431 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicole C. Krämer: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 4
2002 4
2003 8
2004 1
2005 6
2006 5
2007 9
2008 17
2009 12
2010 25
2011 34
2012 18
2013 17
2014 22
2015 26
2016 24
2017 27
2018 25
2019 14
2020 26
2021 31
2022 21
2023 23
2024 13
2025 17
Total 431
Download as CSV

Nicole C. Krämer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicole C. Krämer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 311–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 316 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100 316
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicole C. Krämer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicole C. Krämer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nicole C. Krämer is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany. Their research spans several interrelated fields, mainly focusing on social sciences, computer science, and psychology. Within these broad areas, Krämer's work is also categorized into subfields such as sociology and political science, artificial intelligence, social psychology, literature and literary theory, and communication.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)

Nicole C. Krämer has published extensively in various venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Technology Mind and Behavior
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Behaviour and Information Technology
  • New Media & Society

Some notable recent papers by Krämer include:

  • "Explainable AI in medical imaging: An overview for clinical practitioners - Beyond saliency-based XAI approaches," 2023, European Journal of Radiology
  • "Explainable AI in medical imaging: An overview for clinical practitioners - Saliency-based XAI approaches," 2023, European Journal of Radiology
  • "When is Disinformation (In)Credible? Experimental Findings on Message Characteristics and Individual Differences," 2020, Mass Communication & Society
  • "The Strength of Weak Ties Revisited: Further Evidence of the Role of Strong Ties in the Provision of Online Social Support," 2021, Social Media + Society
  • "Out of Control - Privacy Calculus and the Effect of Perceived Control and Moral Considerations on the Usage of IoT Healthcare Devices," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology

Frequent co-authors of Krämer include:

  • Yannic Meier
  • Judith Meinert
  • Jessica M. Szczuka
  • Aike C. Horstmann
  • Magdalena Wischnewski

Among book publications, Krämer has contributed to titles published by DuD-Fachbeiträge, including "Die Zukunft von Privatheit und Selbstbestimmung" (2022).

Best Publications

  • Overview and recent advances in partial least squares

    Roman Rosipal;Nicole Krämer

  • Impression Management 2.0. The Relationship of Self-Esteem, Extraversion, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Presentation Within Social Networking Sites.

    Nicole C. Krämer;Stephan Winter

  • Social Comparison 2.0: Examining the Effects of Online Profiles on Social-Networking Sites

    Nina Haferkamp;Nicole C. Krämer

  • Avatar-Mediated Networking: Increasing Social Presence and Interpersonal Trust in Net-Based Collaborations

    Gary Bente;Sabine Rüggenberg;Nicole C. Krämer;Felix Eschenburg

  • A conversational agent as museum guide: design and evaluation of a real-world application

    Stefan Kopp;Lars Gesellensetter;Nicole C. Krämer;Ipke Wachsmuth

  • It doesn't matter what you are! Explaining social effects of agents and avatars

    Astrid M. von der Pütten;Nicole C. Krämer;Jonathan Gratch;Sin-Hwa Kang

  • 2009 Special Issue: Time Domain Parameters as a feature for EEG-based Brain-Computer Interfaces

    Carmen Vidaurre;Nicole Krämer;Benjamin Blankertz;Alois Schlögl

  • An Experimental Study on Emotional Reactions Towards a Robot

    Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten;Nicole C. Krämer;Laura Hoffmann;Sabrina Sobieraj

  • The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: The role of individual characteristics and group norms

    Sonja Utz;Nicole C. Krämer

  • To gamify or not to gamify? An experimental field study of the influence of badges on motivation, activity, and performance in an online learning course

    Unknown

  • Verbal Venting in the Social Web: Effects of Anonymity and Group Norms on Aggressive Language Use in Online Comments

    Leonie Rösner;Nicole C. Krämer

  • Self-transcendent Media Experiences: Taking Meaningful Media to a Higher Level

    Mary Beth Oliver;Arthur A. Raney;Michael D. Slater;Markus Appel

  • They Came, They Liked, They Commented: Social Influence on Facebook News Channels

    Stephan Winter;Caroline Brückner;Nicole C. Krämer

  • An Agenda for Open Science in Communication

    Tobias Dienlin;Niklas Johannes;Niklas Johannes;Nicholas David Bowman;Philipp K. Masur

  • How design characteristics of robots determine evaluation and uncanny valley related responses

    Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten;Nicole C. Krämer

  • Dangerous minds? Effects of uncivil online comments on aggressive cognitions, emotions, and behavior

    Leonie Rösner;Stephan Winter;Nicole C. Krämer

  • Psychosocial functions of social media usage in a disaster situation: A multi-methodological approach

    German Neubaum;Leonie Rösner;Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten;Nicole C. Krämer

  • Same Same But Different!? The Differential Influence of Smilies and Emoticons on Person Perception

    Tina Ganster;Sabrina C. Eimler;Nicole C. Krämer

  • Investigations on empathy towards humans and robots using fMRI

    Astrid M. Rosenthal-Von Der Pütten;Frank P. Schulte;Sabrina C. Eimler;Sabrina Sobieraj

  • Entertaining Media Use and the Satisfaction of Recovery Needs: Recovery Outcomes Associated With the Use of Interactive and Noninteractive Entertaining Media

    Leonard Reinecke;Jennifer Klatt;Nicole C. Krämer

  • Another brick in the Facebook wall – How personality traits relate to the content of status updates

    Stephan Winter;German Neubaum;Sabrina C. Eimler;Vanessa Gordon

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary Bente
Gary Bente Michigan State University
Stefan Kopp
Stefan Kopp Bielefeld University
Jonathan Gratch
Jonathan Gratch University of Southern California
Matthias Brand
Matthias Brand University of Duisburg-Essen
Mary Beth Oliver
Mary Beth Oliver Pennsylvania State University
Nikol Rummel
Nikol Rummel Ruhr University Bochum
Stacy Marsella
Stacy Marsella Northeastern University
Leonard Reinecke
Leonard Reinecke Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Hiroshi Ishiguro
Hiroshi Ishiguro Osaka University
E. Tory Higgins
E. Tory Higgins Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology can lead to diverse careers, including opportunities in social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students explore online degree programs to balance flexibility with their academic ambitions. Online psychology and social work programs often include essential coursework in human behavior, ethics, and case management, preparing graduates for licensure and practice.

Each state has unique requirements for social work professionals. If you are interested in becoming a social worker in Tennessee, you will need to meet specific educational and licensing guidelines. Similarly, the requirements to be a social worker in Texas include accredited degrees and passing state exams.

For those planning to practice elsewhere, discover more about the requirements to be a social worker in Utah or the process of becoming a social worker in Vermont. Choosing the right program can help you meet your state’s requirements and launch a meaningful career in mental health or community support services.

Best Scientists Citing Nicole C. Krämer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles