World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5816 5404 3152 2858 196 14609

Ellen Wartella publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ellen Wartella between 1973 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ellen Wartella published across 52 years, from 1973 to 2024, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2010. 2 of the 259 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2010. 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 6 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 9 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1973 2024

259 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ellen Wartella: publications per year, 1973 to 2024
Year Publications
1973 2
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 6
1978 3
1979 6
1980 2
1981 5
1982 3
1983 2
1984 2
1985 2
1986 4
1987 5
1988 3
1989 4
1990 4
1991 4
1992 1
1993 1
1994 3
1995 4
1996 7
1997 1
1998 9
1999 3
2000 4
2001 6
2002 3
2003 3
2004 4
2005 5
2006 4
2007 6
2008 4
2009 5
2010 18
2011 3
2012 5
2013 7
2014 15
2015 7
2016 9
2017 7
2018 8
2019 10
2020 8
2021 16
2022 11
2023 0
2024 2
Total 259
Download as CSV

Ellen Wartella publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen Wartella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 196 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 196
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ellen Wartella D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen Wartella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Ellen Wartella is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and specializes in the social sciences with a focus on education, sociology and political science, literature and literary theory, communication, and health. Their research extensively covers the intersection of child development, digital technology, and media influences.

Their work explores topics such as child development and digital technology, impact of technology on adolescents, social media and politics, media influence and health, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, misinformation and its impacts, and mental health treatment and access.

Recent publications by Ellen Wartella include:

  • Using social media influencers to increase knowledge and positive attitudes toward the flu vaccine, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Content Themes and Influential Voices Within Vaccine Opposition on Twitter, 2019, 2020, American Journal of Public Health
  • Evaluation of a campaign to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in New Jersey, 2020, Preventive Medicine
  • Who's modeling STEM for kids? A character analysis of children's STEM-focused television in the US, 2020, Journal of Children and Media
  • The power of parent attitudes: Examination of parent attitudes toward traditional and emerging technology, 2021, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies

Frequent coauthors with whom they have collaborated include Alexis R. Lauricella, Joe Smyser, Erika Bonnevie, Jaclyn Goldbarg, and Drew P. Cingel.

Ellen Wartella has published numerous articles in venues such as SSRN Electronic Journal, PLoS ONE, Journal of Children and Media, Frontiers in Education, and Preventive Medicine.

In recognition of scientific contributions, they were named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2007.

Best Publications

  • The Influence of Media Violence on Youth

    Craig A. Anderson;Leonard Berkowitz;Edward I Donnerstein;L. Rowell Huesmann

  • Zero to Six: Electronic Media in the Lives of Infants, Toddlers and Preschoolers

    Victoria J. Rideout;Elizabeth A. Vandewater;Ellen A. Wartella

  • How Children Learn to Buy: The Development of Consumer Information-Processing Skills

    Scott Ward;Daniel B. Wackman;Ellen Wartella

  • MediaMaking: Mass Media in a Popular Culture

    Lawrence Grossberg;Ellen Wartella;D. Charles Whitney

  • Young children's screen time: The complex role of parent and child factors

    Alexis R. Lauricella;Ellen Ann Wartella;Victoria J. Rideout

  • Digital childhood: electronic media and technology use among infants, toddlers, and preschoolers.

    Elizabeth A. Vandewater;Victoria J. Rideout;Ellen A. Wartella;Ellen A. Wartella;Xuan Huang

  • Screen Media Exposure and Obesity in Children and Adolescents.

    Thomas N. Robinson;Thomas N. Robinson;Jorge A. Banda;Lauren Hale;Amy Shirong Lu

  • Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education

    Courtney K Blackwell;Alexis Re Lauricella;Ellen Ann Wartella

  • Media and Young Children's Learning

    Heather L. Kirkorian;Ellen A. Wartella;Daniel R. Anderson

  • Children and computers: new technology--old concerns.

    Ellen A. Wartella;Nancy Jennings

  • Teens, Health and Technology: A National Survey

    Ellen Wartella;Vicky Rideout;Heather Montague;Leanne Beaudoin-Ryan

  • Historical Trends in Research on Children and the Media: 1900–1960

    Ellen Wartella;Byron Reeves

  • Parental Co-Use of Media Technology with their Young Children in the USA

    Sabrina L. Connell;Alexis R. Lauricella;Ellen Wartella

  • How children learn to buy

    James Utah McNeal;Scott Ward;Daniel B. Wackman;Ellen Wartella

  • Adoption and use of technology in early education

    Courtney K. Blackwell;Alexis R. Lauricella;Ellen Wartella;Michael Robb

  • Measuring the Effects of Sexual Content in the Media: A Report to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Huston Ac;Wartella E;Donnerstein E;Scantlin R

  • When the Television Is Always On: Heavy Television Exposure and Young Children’s Development

    Elizabeth A. Vandewater;David S. Bickham;June H. Lee;Hope M. Cummings

  • "No—You Can't Watch That" Parental Rules and Young Children's Media Use

    Elizabeth A. Vandewater;Seoung Eun Park;Xuan Huang;Ellen A. Wartella

  • Measuring with Murray

    Fashina Aladé;Alexis R. Lauricella;Leanne Beaudoin-Ryan;Ellen Wartella

  • The influence of TPACK contextual factors on early childhood educators' tablet computer use

    Courtney K. Blackwell;Alexis R. Lauricella;Ellen Wartella

  • Just a talking book? Word learning from watching baby videos.

    Michael B. Robb;Rebekah A. Richert;Ellen A. Wartella

Frequent Co-Authors

Alice H. Lichtenstein
Alice H. Lichtenstein Tufts University
Lawrence Grossberg
Lawrence Grossberg University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mary Story
Mary Story Duke University
Sandra L. Calvert
Sandra L. Calvert Georgetown University
Byron Reeves
Byron Reeves Stanford University
Teresa K. Woodruff
Teresa K. Woodruff Northwestern University
Edward Donnerstein
Edward Donnerstein University of Arizona
Aletha C. Huston
Aletha C. Huston The University of Texas at Austin
Mabel L. Rice
Mabel L. Rice University of Kansas
Sharon Dunwoody
Sharon Dunwoody University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering an online psychology degree can open flexible possibilities for both education and career development. Programs across the United States accommodate different needs, including fully online and hybrid formats, which are ideal for working adults or those seeking affordable options.

Choices vary by region, with options like the easiest online psychology degrees in the Midwest offering accessible programs that blend academic support with convenience. Students in Texas can benefit from region-specific pathways such as the easiest online psychology degrees in Texas, which may be tailored to statewide licensure requirements and local workforce demands.

Additionally, specialized lists like the easiest online psychology degrees in San Antonio help local learners identify the most accessible programs in their city. For those considering the southern United States broadly, the psychology programs online in the South can guide students to regionally relevant degrees.

Graduates of these programs often pursue careers in counseling, human resources, social work, or further graduate study. With the growing popularity and credibility of online education, these accessible programs provide a practical entry point to a broad range of career opportunities in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Ellen Wartella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles