World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
6392
World Ranking
8849
National Ranking
4704

John C. Wright publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Wright sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

John C. Wright D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Wright sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For fundamental contributions to the development, understanding, and applications of multiresonant four wave mixing methods for electronic and vibrational molecular condensed phase spectroscopy
  • 1942 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1931 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

John C. Wright was affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research predominantly focused on the field of Materials Science, encompassing 47 publications within this domain.

Their work spanned several subfields including Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, and Spectroscopy.

Key topics covered in their research involved:

  • Perovskite Materials and Applications
  • 2D Materials and Applications
  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
  • Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

Wright contributed to publications in numerous venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
  • ACS Energy Letters

Notable recent papers by Wright included:

  • "Deterministic fabrication of arbitrary vertical heterostructures of two-dimensional Ruddlesden-Popper halide perovskites" (2020, Nature Nanotechnology)
  • "MIP* = RE" (2021, Communications of the ACM)
  • "Supertwisted spirals of layered materials enabled by growth on non-Euclidean surfaces" (2020, Science)
  • "Distinct Carrier Transport Properties Across Horizontally vs Vertically Oriented Heterostructures of 2D/3D Perovskites" (2021, Journal of the American Chemical Society)
  • "Band Edge Tuning of Two-Dimensional Ruddlesden-Popper Perovskites by A Cation Size Revealed through Nanoplates" (2020, ACS Energy Letters)

Frequent coauthors working alongside Wright were:

  • Song Jin
  • Chris R. Roy
  • Daniel D. Kohler
  • Willa Mihalyi-Koch
  • Kyana M. Sanders

Wright received multiple recognitions, including fellowships from major scientific societies. These included being named a Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS) in 2003 for contributions to multiresonant four-wave mixing methods used in electronic and vibrational molecular condensed phase spectroscopy.

Additionally, Wright was a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), with fellowships recorded in 1931 and 1942.

Best Publications

  • EARLY CHILDHOOD TELEVISION VIEWING AND ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR: THE RECONTACT STUDY

    Daniel R. Anderson;Aletha C. Huston;Kelly L. Schmitt;Deborah L. Linebarger

  • The relations of early television viewing to school readiness and vocabulary of children from low-income families: the early window project.

    John C. Wright;Aletha C. Huston;Kimberlee C. Murphy;Michelle St. Peters

  • Words from Sesame Street : learning vocabulary while viewing

    Mabel L. Rice;Aletha C. Huston;Rosemarie Truglio;John C. Wright

  • How young children spend their time: television and other activities

    Aletha C. Huston;John C. Wright;Janet Marquis;Samuel B. Green

  • The Relation Between Selective Attention to Television Forms and Children's Comprehension of Content.

    Sandra L. Calvert;Aletha C. Huston;Bruce A. Watkins;John C. Wright

  • American children's use of electronic media in 1997: A national survey

    John C Wright;Aletha C Huston;Elizabeth A Vandewater;David S Bickham

  • MIP* = RE

    Zhengfeng Ji;Anand Natarajan;Thomas Vidick;John Wright

  • Development of television viewing patterns in early childhood: A longitudinal investigation.

    Aletha C. Huston;John C. Wright;Mabel L. Rice;Dennis Kerkman

  • Young Children's Perceptions of Television Reality: Determinants and Developmental Differences.

    John C. Wright;Aletha C. Huston;Alice Leary Reitz;Suwatchara Piemyat

  • Pace and Continuity of Television Programs: Effects on Children's Attention and Comprehension.

    John C. Wright;Aletha C. Huston;Rhonda P. Ross;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Television and Families: What Do Young Children Watch with Their Parents?.

    Michelle St. Peters;Marguerite Fitch;Aletha C. Huston;John C. Wright

  • A matter of form: Potentials of television for young viewers.

    John C. Wright;Aletha C. Huston

  • When celebrities talk, children listen: An experimental analysis of children's responses to TV ads with celebrity endorsement

    Rhonda P. Ross;Toni Campbell;John C. Wright;Aletha C. Huston

  • Communicating More than Content: Formal Features of Children's Television Programs

    Aletha C. Huston;John C. Wright;Ellen Wartella;Mabel L. Rice

  • Predictors of Children's Electronic Media Use: An Examination of Three Ethnic Groups

    David S. Bickham;Elizabeth A. Vandewater;Aletha C. Huston;June H. Lee

  • Children's recall of television material: Effects of presentation mode and adult labeling.

    Bruce Watkins;Sandra Calvert;Aletha Huston-Stein;John C. Wright

  • The development of selective attention: from perceptual exploration to logical search.

    John C. Wright;Alice G. Vlietstra

  • Subtle Sex-Role Cues in Children's Commercials.

    Renate L. Welch;Aletha Huston-Stein;John C. Wright;Robert Plehal

  • The forms of television: Effects on children’s attention, comprehension, and social behavior

    Mabel L. Rice;Aletha C. Huston;John C. Wright

  • Occupational Portrayals on Television: Children's Role Schemata, Career Aspirations, and Perceptions of Reality

    John C. Wright;Aletha C. Huston;Rosemarie Truglio;Marguerite Fitch

Frequent Co-Authors

Aletha C. Huston
Aletha C. Huston The University of Texas at Austin
Daniel R. Anderson
Daniel R. Anderson University of Massachusetts Amherst
Sandra L. Calvert
Sandra L. Calvert Georgetown University
Sandra L. Hofferth
Sandra L. Hofferth University of Maryland, College Park
Ellen Wartella
Ellen Wartella Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling gives students flexibility along with access to reputable programs nationwide. Whether you're interested in clinical practice, research, or specialist roles, finding the right program is key. Online pathways make it possible for learners to juggle studies around work or family commitments.

When considering your options, focus on value, accreditation, and regional strengths. For example, the best value counseling master's degrees in the South highlight affordable programs with strong outcomes. If you're in the Northeast, check out the most valuable counseling programs in New York for opportunities uniquely tailored to that area.

For those seeking psychology credentials, many states feature standout online offerings. The best online psychology degree rankings in Alabama showcase top bachelor’s and master’s options, while the best online psychology bachelor's program rankings in Cincinnati highlight quality programs in the Midwest.

These online degree pathways can lead to rewarding roles in mental health, research, human services, and beyond. By comparing regional and national program rankings, you can find the path that aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Wright

Recently Published Articles