World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5127 4754 2822 2554 151 15295

Sandra L. Calvert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sandra L. Calvert between 1979 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sandra L. Calvert published across 44 years, from 1979 to 2022, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2012. 5 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2012. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications
1979 2022

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sandra L. Calvert: publications per year, 1979 to 2022
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 2
1983 1
1984 2
1985 2
1986 1
1987 4
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 2
1993 4
1994 4
1995 0
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 0
2000 2
2001 6
2002 3
2003 6
2004 4
2005 2
2006 2
2007 2
2008 5
2009 8
2010 9
2011 8
2012 13
2013 7
2014 10
2015 3
2016 5
2017 9
2018 3
2019 3
2020 3
2021 3
2022 2
Total 156
Download as CSV

Sandra L. Calvert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra L. Calvert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 151
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sandra L. Calvert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra L. Calvert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Sandra L. Calvert is affiliated with Georgetown University in the United States, focusing research primarily within the social sciences and arts and humanities. Their work intersects multiple disciplines, emphasizing education, literature and literary theory, sociology and political science, artificial intelligence, and statistics and probability.

The core topics addressed in Sandra L. Calvert's research include child development and digital technology, media influence and health, the impact of technology on adolescents, AI in service interactions, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, and educational methods and practices.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Sandra L. Calvert feature the following:

  • "Parent reports of children's parasocial relationships with conversational agents: Trusted voices in children's lives" (2021), published in Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
  • "Intelligent digital beings as children's imaginary social companions" (2021), published in Journal of Children and Media
  • "Young children's mathematics learning from same-gender and other-gender intelligent character prototypes" (2022), published in Technology Mind and Behavior
  • "Parasocial Engagement in Childhood" (2020), published in The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Sandra L. Calvert include:

  • Anna Hoffman
  • Diana Owen
  • Marisa M. Putnam
  • Rebecca M. Ryan
  • Evan Barba

Publication venues regularly featuring their work include:

  • Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
  • Journal of Children and Media
  • Technology Mind and Behavior
  • The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology

Sandra L. Calvert has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 1998, indicating a longstanding professional engagement in the field of psychology.

Best Publications

  • College students' social networking experiences on Facebook

    Tiffany A. Pempek;Yevdokiya A. Yermolayeva;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Gender, Identity, and Language Use in Teenage Blogs

    David A. Huffaker;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Children as consumers: advertising and marketing.

    Sandra L. Calvert

  • Screen Media Exposure and Obesity in Children and Adolescents.

    Thomas N. Robinson;Thomas N. Robinson;Jorge A. Banda;Lauren Hale;Amy Shirong Lu

  • Exergames for Physical Education Courses: Physical, Social, and Cognitive Benefits

    Amanda E. Staiano;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Brief report: vocabulary acquisition for children with autism: teacher or computer instruction.

    Monique Moore;Sandra Calvert

  • Impact of virtual reality on young adults' physiological arousal and aggressive thoughts: Interaction versus observation

    Sandra L. Calvert;Siu-Lan Tan

  • The Relation Between Selective Attention to Television Forms and Children's Comprehension of Content.

    Sandra L. Calvert;Aletha C. Huston;Bruce A. Watkins;John C. Wright

  • Children's Journeys Through the Information Age

    Sandra L. Calvert

  • Adolescent exergame play for weight loss and psychosocial improvement: A controlled physical activity intervention†

    Amanda E. Staiano;Anisha A. Abraham;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Age, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Patterns in Early Computer Use A National Survey

    Sandra L. Calvert;Victoria J. Rideout;Jennifer L. Woolard;Rachel F. Barr

  • Infant and Early Childhood Exposure to Adult-Directed and Child-Directed Television Programming: Relations with Cognitive Skills at Age Four

    Rachel Barr;Alexis Lauricella;Elizabeth Zack;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Youth violence: What we know and what we need to know.

    Brad J. Bushman;Katherine Newman;Sandra L. Calvert;Geraldine Downey

  • Identity construction on the Internet.

    Sandra L. Calvert

  • Tipping the balance: use of advergames to promote consumption of nutritious foods and beverages by low-income African American children.

    Tiffany A. Pempek;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Parent-child interactions during traditional and computer storybook reading for children's comprehension

    Alexis R. Lauricella;Rachel Barr;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Toddlers' Learning From Socially Meaningful Video Characters

    Alexis R. Lauricella;Alice Ann Howard Gola;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Competitive versus Cooperative Exergame Play for African American Adolescents' Executive Function Skills: Short-Term Effects in a Long-Term Training Intervention.

    Amanda E. Staiano;Anisha A. Abraham;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Pace and Continuity of Television Programs: Effects on Children's Attention and Comprehension.

    John C. Wright;Aletha C. Huston;Rhonda P. Ross;Sandra L. Calvert

  • The handbook of children, media, and development

    Sandra L. Calvert;Sandra L. Calvert;Barbara Jan Wilson

  • The development of a child into a consumer

    P.M. Valkenburg;J. Cantor;S. Calvert;C. Cocking

Frequent Co-Authors

Rachel Barr
Rachel Barr Georgetown University
John C. Wright
John C. Wright The University of Texas at Austin
Ellen Wartella
Ellen Wartella Northwestern University
Aletha C. Huston
Aletha C. Huston The University of Texas at Austin
Thomas N. Robinson
Thomas N. Robinson University of Colorado Denver
Patti M. Valkenburg
Patti M. Valkenburg University of Amsterdam
Patricia M. Greenfield
Patricia M. Greenfield University of California, Los Angeles
Brad J. Bushman
Brad J. Bushman The Ohio State University
Sandra Graham
Sandra Graham University of California, Los Angeles
Ann S. Masten
Ann S. Masten University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree opens diverse career pathways across the U.S. Graduates frequently explore roles in mental health counseling, therapy, research, or education. To become a practicing therapist, students must be aware that state requirements for licensure can differ substantially.

For example, those interested in counseling in Minneapolis should review the licensed therapist requirements in Minneapolis, which outline local educational and supervised practice expectations. Similarly, aspiring counselors in Tennessee can check Nashville's specific prerequisites by consulting Nashville licensed therapist education requirements.

Students considering practice in Louisiana will need to understand the licensed therapist requirements in New Orleans. Meanwhile, those targeting a career in New York should be familiar with New York City licensed therapist education requirements.

By carefully reviewing local licensure information and selecting suitable online programs, students can chart the right course to a rewarding career in psychology or counseling—regardless of location.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra L. Calvert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles