World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan M. Kalman

Jonathan M. Kalman

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
114
Citations
74833
World Ranking
4624
National Ranking
130

Jonathan M. Kalman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Kalman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 731 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jonathan M. Kalman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Kalman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 114 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan M. Kalman is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and has an extensive research portfolio primarily in the field of medicine, focusing on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their research encompasses a range of topics centered on cardiac health and electrophysiology. Key areas of work include:

  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Jonathan M. Kalman has contributed to the literature with numerous publications in prominent venues such as:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
  • European Heart Journal
  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • EP Europace

Recent papers include:

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Corrigendum to: 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • Alcohol Abstinence in Drinkers with Atrial Fibrillation, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation, 2024, EP Europace
  • Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, 2023, JAMA

Jonathan M. Kalman collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Peter M. Kistler
  • Hariharan Sugumar
  • David Chieng
  • Aleksandr Voskoboinik
  • Sandeep Prabhu

Their work also intersects with subfields including surgery, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and economics and econometrics, although the primary focus remains on cardiology-related topics.

Best Publications

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

    Gerhard Hindricks;Tatjana Potpara;Nikolaos Dagres;Elena Arbelo

  • 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

    Hugh Calkins;Karl Heinz Kuck;Riccardo Cappato;Josep Brugada

  • 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

    Hugh Calkins;Karl Heinz Kuck;Riccardo Cappato;Josep Brugada

  • 2017 HRS / EHRA / ECAS / APHRS / SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

    Hugh Calkins;Gerhard Hindricks;Riccardo Cappato;Young Hoon Kim

  • Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation

    Riccardo Cappato;Hugh Calkins;Shih Ann Chen;Wyn Davies

  • Long-Term Effect of Goal-Directed Weight Management in an Atrial Fibrillation Cohort: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study (LEGACY)

    Rajeev K. Pathak;Melissa E. Middeldorp;Megan Meredith;Abhinav B. Mehta

  • Aggressive Risk Factor Reduction Study for Atrial Fibrillation and Implications for the Outcome of Ablation: The ARREST-AF Cohort Study

    Rajeev K. Pathak;Melissa E. Middeldorp;Dennis H. Lau;Abhinav B. Mehta

  • EHRA/HRS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus on atrial cardiomyopathies: Definition, characterization, and clinical implication

    Andreas Goette;Jonathan M. Kalman;Luis Aguinaga;Joseph Akar

  • Effect of Weight Reduction and Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Management on Symptom Burden and Severity in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Hany S. Abed;Gary A. Wittert;Darryl P. Leong;Masoumeh G. Shirazi

  • Electrical remodeling of the atria in congestive heart failure: Electrophysiological and electroanatomic mapping in humans

    Prashanthan Sanders;Joseph B. Morton;Neil C. Davidson;Steven J. Spence

  • Prevalence and Causes of Fatal Outcome in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

    Riccardo Cappato;Hugh Calkins;Shih Ann Chen;Wyn Davies

  • Executive summary: HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes

    Silvia G. Priori;Arthur A. Wilde;Minoru Horie;Yongkeun Cho

  • Role of right atrial endocardial structures as barriers to conduction during human type I atrial flutter. Activation and entrainment mapping guided by intracardiac echocardiography.

    Jeffrey E. Olgin;Jonathan M. Kalman;Adam P. Fitzpatrick;Michael D. Lesh

  • 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary

    Hugh Calkins;Gerhard Hindricks;Riccardo Cappato;Young Hoon Kim

  • Modifiable Risk Factors and Atrial Fibrillation.

    Dennis H. Lau;Stanley Nattel;Jonathan M Kalman;Prashanthan Sanders

  • Catheter ablation versus medical rate control in atrial fibrillation and systolic dysfunction: the CAMERA-MRI study

    Sandeep Prabhu;Andrew J. Taylor;Ben T. Costello;David M. Kaye

  • Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with sympathetic activation.

    Jonathan M. Kalman;Muhammad Munawar;Laurence G. Howes;William J. Louis

  • Impact of CARDIOrespiratory FITness on Arrhythmia Recurrence in Obese Individuals With Atrial Fibrillation: The CARDIO-FIT Study

    Rajeev K. Pathak;Adrian Elliott;Melissa E. Middeldorp;Megan Meredith

  • Ablation of ‘Incisional’ Reentrant Atrial Tachycardia Complicating Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease Use of Entrainment to Define a Critical Isthmus of Conduction

    Jonathan M. Kalman;George F. VanHare;Jeffrey E. Olgin;Leslie A. Saxon

  • Activation and Entrainment Mapping Defines the Tricuspid Annulus as the Anterior Barrier in Typical Atrial Flutter

    Jonathan M. Kalman;Jeffrey E. Olgin;Leslie A. Saxon;Westby G. Fisher

Frequent Co-Authors

Prashanthan Sanders
Prashanthan Sanders University of Adelaide
Michael D. Lesh
Michael D. Lesh University of California, San Francisco
Stanley Nattel
Stanley Nattel Montreal Heart Institute
David M. Kaye
David M. Kaye The Alfred Hospital
Jeffrey E. Olgin
Jeffrey E. Olgin University of California, San Francisco
Shih-Ann Chen
Shih-Ann Chen National Chung Hsing University
José Jalife
José Jalife University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Randall J. Lee
Randall J. Lee University of California, San Francisco
Francis E. Marchlinski
Francis E. Marchlinski University of Pennsylvania
Melvin M. Scheinman
Melvin M. Scheinman University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of Medicine in the USA isn't limited to the traditional MD path. Innovative dnp programs without dissertation are ideal for nurses who want to advance their careers with less research-intensive coursework. These programs focus on clinical practice and leadership rather than heavy academic research, offering a faster, career-oriented route.

For those looking for a swift entry into healthcare, fast track lpn programs provide accelerated options to become a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time. This pathway allows students to start working and gaining experience in critical healthcare settings sooner.

Mental health is also a booming field. The flexible msn to pmhnp online programs support nurses aiming to specialize as Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners. These programs are designed to be completed quickly while maintaining high educational standards.

Not all healthcare careers require direct patient care. The bachelors in health administration is a smart choice for those drawn to leadership, management, and administrative roles within healthcare organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan M. Kalman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles