World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 53 4749 4397 2635 2383 134 13659

Rachel Barr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rachel Barr between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rachel Barr published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2025. 32 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2025. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 18 publications
1990 2025

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rachel Barr: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 6
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 1
2002 2
2003 4
2004 0
2005 2
2006 0
2007 4
2008 3
2009 6
2010 12
2011 4
2012 10
2013 4
2014 9
2015 11
2016 7
2017 6
2018 3
2019 9
2020 13
2021 12
2022 16
2023 12
2024 14
2025 18
Total 193
Download as CSV

Rachel Barr publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel Barr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 134
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rachel Barr D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel Barr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 53
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rachel Barr is affiliated with Georgetown University in the United States. Their scholarly work primarily focuses on the intersection of child development and digital technology, encompassing related themes such as the impact of technology on adolescents, child and animal learning development, social media and politics, ICT in developing communities, language development and disorders, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Their research has been published extensively within the fields of social sciences and psychology, particularly emphasizing education, sociology and political science, developmental and educational psychology, communication, and clinical psychology. Frequent publication venues for their work include Frontiers in Psychology, Infancy, Computers in Human Behavior, Developmental Psychobiology, and the Journal of Children and Media.

Among notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Rachel Barr are:

  • "Young Children's Use of Smartphones and Tablets" (2020, PEDIATRICS)
  • "Beyond Screen Time: A Synergistic Approach to a More Comprehensive Assessment of Family Media Exposure During Early Childhood" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Growing Up in a Digital World - Digital Media and the Association With the Child's Language Development at Two Years of Age" (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Quality of Mother-Child Interaction Before, During, and After Smartphone Use" (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Zooming through development: Using video chat to support family connections" (2021, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies)

Rachel Barr frequently collaborates with several colleagues in their research endeavors. Prominent coauthors include Felix Koch, Annette Sundqvist, Sarah M. Coyne, Joscelin Rocha-Hidalgo, and Heather L. Kirkorian.

In addition to articles, they have contributed to book publications, with a recorded title being Early Childhood and Digital Media published by Cambridge University Press in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Learning from television in young children

    R. Barr;Natalie Brito

  • Fathers Are Parents, Too! Widening the Lens on Parenting for Children's Development

    Natasha J. Cabrera;Brenda L. Volling;Rachel Barr

  • Developmental changes in deferred imitation by 6- to 24-month-old infants

    Rachel Barr;Anne Dowden;Harlene Hayne

  • Developmental changes in imitation from television during infancy.

    Rachel Barr;Harlene Hayne

  • Transfer of learning between 2D and 3D sources during infancy: Informing theory and practice.

    Rachel Barr

  • The development of declarative memory in human infants: age-related changes in deferred imitation.

    Harlene Hayne;Joanne Boniface;Rachel Barr

  • Age, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Patterns in Early Computer Use A National Survey

    Sandra L. Calvert;Victoria J. Rideout;Jennifer L. Woolard;Rachel F. Barr

  • Infant and Early Childhood Exposure to Adult-Directed and Child-Directed Television Programming: Relations with Cognitive Skills at Age Four

    Rachel Barr;Alexis Lauricella;Elizabeth Zack;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Developmental changes in the specificity of memory over the second year of life

    Harlene Hayne;Shelley MacDonald;Rachel Barr

  • Memory Constraints on Infant Learning From Picture Books, Television, and Touchscreens

    Rachel Barr

  • Young Children’s Use of Smartphones and Tablets

    Jenny S. Radesky;Heidi M. Weeks;Rosa Ball;Alexandria Schaller

  • Associations between parenting, media use, cumulative risk, and children's executive functioning.

    Deborah L. Linebarger;Rachel Barr;Matthew A. Lapierre;Jessica T. Piotrowski

  • Infants' Attention and Responsiveness to Television Increases With Prior Exposure and Parental Interaction

    Rachel Barr;Elizabeth Zack;Amaya Garcia;Paul Muentener

  • Parent-child interactions during traditional and computer storybook reading for children's comprehension

    Alexis R. Lauricella;Rachel Barr;Sandra L. Calvert

  • Infant imitation from television using novel touch screen technology

    Elizabeth Zack;Rachel Barr;Peter Gerhardstein;Kelly Dickerson

  • The effect of repetition on imitation from television during infancy.

    Rachel Barr;Paul Muentener;Amaya Garcia;Melissa Fujimoto

  • Age-related changes in deferred imitation from television by 6- to 18-month-olds.

    Rachel Barr;Paul Muentener;Amaya Garcia

  • Socioeconomic Disparities in Neurocognitive Development in the First Two Years of Life

    Kimberly G. Noble;Laura E. Engelhardt;Natalie H. Brito;Luke J. Mack

  • It's Not What You Know, It's Who You Know: Older siblings facilitate imitation during infancy

    Rachel Barr;Harlene Hayne

  • Beyond Screen Time: A Synergistic Approach to a More Comprehensive Assessment of Family Media Exposure During Early Childhood.

    Rachel Barr;Heather Kirkorian;Jenny Radesky;Sarah Coyne

  • Influence of Bilingualism on Memory Generalization during Infancy.

    Natalie Brito;Rachel Barr

  • Age-Related Changes in Imitation: Implications for Memory Development

    Harlene Hayne

Frequent Co-Authors

Harlene Hayne
Harlene Hayne Curtin University
Sandra L. Calvert
Sandra L. Calvert Georgetown University
Carolyn Rovee-Collier
Carolyn Rovee-Collier Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Mikael Heimann
Mikael Heimann Linköping University
W. Gerrod Parrott
W. Gerrod Parrott Georgetown University
Mary Rudner
Mary Rudner Linköping University
Michael T. Ullman
Michael T. Ullman Georgetown University
Sarah M. Coyne
Sarah M. Coyne Brigham Young University
Núria Sebastián-Gallés
Núria Sebastián-Gallés Pompeu Fabra University
Andrew N. Meltzoff
Andrew N. Meltzoff University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree unlocks diverse online study and career options. Many students pursue online degrees to become mental health counselors, therapists, or other behavioral health specialists, tailoring their studies for specific state requirements. Each state and city may have unique pathways and criteria for licensure.

For example, if you’re interested in counseling in Texas, learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in Plano. In Florida, you’ll want to review the Port St. Lucie mental health counselor education requirements.

Requirements can also vary significantly in places like Oregon. Delve into the mental health counselor requirements in Portland. Similarly, aspiring counselors can reference the Raleigh mental health counselor education requirements for North Carolina.

Before choosing your online degree or career path, investigate specific licensure guidelines for your desired location. Carefully selecting the right accredited program will help you meet your career goals in psychology and mental health counseling across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Rachel Barr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles