World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gisa Aschersleben

Gisa Aschersleben

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
15799
World Ranking
5557
National Ranking
259

Gisa Aschersleben publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gisa Aschersleben sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gisa Aschersleben D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gisa Aschersleben sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gisa Aschersleben is affiliated with Saarland University in Germany and specializes primarily in the field of Psychology. Their research spans several subfields, including Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Education, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their main research topics focus on:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Action Observation and Synchronization

Gisa Aschersleben has authored multiple papers, including:

  • "Quantifying Sources of Variability in Infancy Research Using the Infant-Directed-Speech Preference" (2020), published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • "A model's natural group membership affects over-imitation in 6-year-olds" (2020), published in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • "Culture shapes preschoolers' emotion recognition but not emotion comprehension: a cross-cultural study in Germany and Singapore" (2022), published in Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
  • "Die Wirkung achtsamkeitsbasierter Kurzzeitinterventionen auf das Kurz- und Langzeitgedächtnis im Grundschulalter" (2020), published in Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie
  • "General Cognitive Abilities and Psychosocial Development in Children and Adolescents Having a Co-Twin with Down Syndrome" (2021), published in The Journal of Pediatrics

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Andrea A. R. Krieger
  • Corina Möller
  • Michael C. Frank
  • Katie Alcock
  • Natalia Arias-Trejo

Gisa Aschersleben's work has appeared in various publication venues, notably:

  • Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie
  • The Journal of Pediatrics

Best Publications

  • The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

    Bernhard Hommel;Jochen Müsseler;Gisa Aschersleben;Wolfgang Prinz

  • Codes and their vicissitudes

    Bernhard Hommel;Jochen Müsseler;Gisa Aschersleben;Wolfgang Prinz

  • Transformations in the Couplings Among Intellectual Abilities and Constituent Cognitive Processes Across the Life Span

    Shu-Chen Li;Ulman Lindenberger;Bernhard Hommel;Gisa Aschersleben

  • Temporal Control of Movements in Sensorimotor Synchronization

    Gisa Aschersleben

  • Synchronizing actions with events: The role of sensory information

    Gisa Aschersleben;Wolfgang Prinz

  • Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation.

    Birgit Stürmer;Gisa Aschersleben;Wolfgang Prinz

  • Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location

    Paul Bertelson;Gisa Aschersleben

  • COGNITIVE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PERCEPTION OF SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL EVENTS

    Gisa Aschersleben;T. Bakhman;Jochen Müsseler

  • Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed-speech preference

    Michael C. Frank;Katherine Jane Alcock;Natalia Arias-Trejo;Gisa Aschersleben

  • The early origins of goal attribution in infancy

    Ildikó Király;Bianca Jovanovic;Wolfgang Prinz;Gisa Aschersleben

  • An analysis of ideomotor action.

    Lothar Knuf;Gisa Aschersleben;Wolfgang Prinz

  • Temporal ventriloquism: crossmodal interaction on the time dimension. 1. Evidence from auditory-visual temporal order judgment.

    Paul Bertelson;Gisa G. Aschersleben

  • Action, binding and awareness

    Patrick Haggard;Gisa Aschersleben;Jörg Gehrke;Wolfgang Prinz

  • Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection

    Florian Waszak;Edmund Wascher;Peter E. Keller;Iring Koch

  • The link between infant attention to goal-directed action and later theory of mind abilities.

    Gisa Aschersleben;Tanja Hofer;Bianca Jovanovic

  • The cerebral oscillatory network associated with auditorily paced finger movements

    Bettina Pollok;Joachim Gross;Katharina Müller;Gisa Aschersleben

  • Delayed auditory feedback in synchronization.

    Gisa Aschersleben;Wolfgang Prinz

  • Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation

    Jochen Müsseler;Gisa Aschersleben

  • The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework of perception and action

    Bernhard Hommel;Jochen Müsseler;Gisa Aschersleben;Wolfgang Prinz

  • Do I get what you get? Learning about the effects of self-performed and observed actions in infancy

    Birgit Elsner;Gisa Aschersleben

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Prinz
Wolfgang Prinz Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Alfons Schnitzler
Alfons Schnitzler Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Bernhard Hommel
Bernhard Hommel Shandong Normal University
Hans-Joachim Freund
Hans-Joachim Freund Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society
Paul Bertelson
Paul Bertelson Université Libre de Bruxelles
Mayada Elsabbagh
Mayada Elsabbagh McGill University
Bettina Pollok
Bettina Pollok Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Annette Karmiloff-Smith Birkbeck, University of London
Iring Koch
Iring Koch RWTH Aachen University
Shu-Chen Li
Shu-Chen Li TU Dresden

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a range of meaningful careers, especially in mental health counseling. As the demand for mental health professionals grows, many students explore online degrees for the flexibility to balance education and other responsibilities.

Requirements to become a counselor differ by state and city. For instance, see the Tucson mental health counselor education requirements for an overview of local licensure steps. Similarly, understanding Tulsa mental health counselor education requirements can guide those studying or planning to practice in Oklahoma.

Some regions may emphasize unique state criteria. To see specific state requirements, check how to become a mental health counselor in how to become a mental health counselor in Virginia Beach. If you are interested in regulations in the nation’s capital, review Washington DC mental health counselor certification requirements.

Whether you study traditional or online programs, understanding these pathways can help you make informed decisions about your education and career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Gisa Aschersleben

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles