World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
6356
World Ranking
8273
National Ranking
77

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
6361
World Ranking
8095
National Ranking
374

Florian Waszak publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florian Waszak sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 122 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Florian Waszak D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florian Waszak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Florian Waszak is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France. Their research primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a strong focus on Cognitive Neuroscience as reflected in their publications.

Their published work involves diverse topics related to neural and behavioral psychology, neural dynamics, and brain function. Key thematic areas in their research include EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neuroscience and music perception, action observation and synchronization, spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction, and tactile and sensory interactions.

Waszak's frequent publication venues include Brain Research, where they have published three papers, SSRN Electronic Journal with two publications, and single contributions to Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Scientific Reports, and Cerebral Cortex.

Prominent recent publications by Florian Waszak include:

  • The auditory brain in action: Intention determines predictive processing in the auditory system-A review of current paradigms and findings (2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review)
  • Intention-based and sensory-based predictions (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • Human Brain Ages With Hierarchy-Selective Attenuation of Prediction Errors (2020, Cerebral Cortex)
  • Advancements in brain-computer interfaces for the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect: a concise review (2024, Frontiers in Neuroscience)
  • Theoretical Perspective on an Ideomotor Brain-Computer Interface: Toward a Naturalistic and Non-invasive Brain-Computer Interface Paradigm Based on Action-Effect Representation (2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience)

Their work is frequently coauthored by a number of researchers, including Álvaro Darriba, Yi-Fang Hsu, Wai Ying Chung, Betina Korka, and Andreas Widmann. Álvaro Darriba is the most frequent coauthor, appearing on ten publications.

Overall, Florian Waszak's research contributes to advancing understanding in several overlapping domains of neuroscience, especially those involving the dynamic interplay of intention, sensory processing, and brain-computer interface technologies.

Best Publications

  • Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs.

    Florian Waszak;Bernhard Hommel;Alan Allport

  • Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: The role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction.

    Gethin Hughes;Andrea Desantis;Florian Waszak

  • Stimulus–response bindings in priming

    Richard N. Henson;Doris Eckstein;Florian Waszak;Christian Frings

  • Action effect anticipation: Neurophysiological basis and functional consequences

    Florian Waszak;Florian Waszak;Pedro Cardoso-Leite;Gethin Hughes;Gethin Hughes

  • On the influence of causal beliefs on the feeling of agency

    Andrea Desantis;Cédric Roussel;Cédric Roussel;Florian Waszak;Florian Waszak

  • Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions

    Arvid Herwig;Wolfgang Prinz;Florian Waszak

  • A New Look at Sensory Attenuation Action-Effect Anticipation Affects Sensitivity, Not Response Bias

    Pedro Cardoso-Leite;Pedro Cardoso-Leite;Pascal Mamassian;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Florian Waszak

  • ERP correlates of action effect prediction and visual sensory attenuation in voluntary action

    Gethin Hughes;Florian Waszak

  • Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection

    Florian Waszak;Edmund Wascher;Peter E. Keller;Iring Koch

  • The flexible mind is associated with the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met polymorphism: evidence for a role of dopamine in the control of task-switching.

    Lorenza S. Colzato;Florian Waszak;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Danielle Posthuma

  • The role of the preSMA and the rostral cingulate zone in internally selected actions

    Veronika A. Mueller;Marcel Brass;Florian Waszak;Wolfgang Prinz

  • The development of attentional networks : Cross-sectional findings from a life span sample

    Florian Waszak;Shu-Chen Li;Bernhard Hommel

  • Believing and perceiving: authorship belief modulates sensory attenuation.

    Andrea Desantis;Carmen Weiss;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Florian Waszak;Florian Waszak

  • Neural and behavioral correlates of intentional actions.

    Veronika Krieghoff;Florian Waszak;Wolfgang Prinz;Marcel Brass

  • Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task switching: Negative priming and competitor priming

    Florian Waszak;Bernhard Hommel;Alan Allport

  • Intention and attention in ideomotor learning

    Arvid Herwig;Florian Waszak

  • Intentional binding is driven by the mere presence of an action and not by motor prediction

    Andrea Desantis;Gethin Hughes;Gethin Hughes;Florian Waszak;Florian Waszak

  • A preactivation account of sensory attenuation

    Cedric Roussel;Gethin Hughes;Gethin Hughes;Florian Waszak;Florian Waszak

  • Attenuation of auditory N1 results from identity-specific action-effect prediction.

    Gethin Hughes;Gethin Hughes;Andrea Desantis;Florian Waszak;Florian Waszak

  • Semantic generalization of stimulus-task bindings

    Florian Waszak;Bernhard Hommel;Alan Allport

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Prinz
Wolfgang Prinz Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Jarmo A. Hämäläinen
Jarmo A. Hämäläinen University of Jyväskylä
Marcel Brass
Marcel Brass Ghent University
Bernhard Hommel
Bernhard Hommel Shandong Normal University
Simone Schütz-Bosbach
Simone Schütz-Bosbach Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Pascal Mamassian
Pascal Mamassian École Normale Supérieure
Andrea Kiesel
Andrea Kiesel University of Freiburg
Nick Yeung
Nick Yeung University of Oxford
Roselind Lieb
Roselind Lieb University of Basel
Peter E. Keller
Peter E. Keller University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens doors to several rewarding careers in health, counseling, and research. Many students choose to pursue further education in areas related to neuroscience, often through flexible online degrees. For those interested in becoming licensed counselors, reviewing cacrep schools is a smart starting point. These accredited programs meet rigorous standards and can lead to licensure.

If clinical practice is your goal, online clinical mental health counseling degrees prepare graduates for direct work with clients of all ages. Those drawn to family dynamics may prefer online mft programs, focusing on marriage and family therapy. Both pathways offer flexible learning and usually include supervised training.

Another popular option is a master's in psychology. Prospective students often ask, "how much is a master's degree in psychology?" Costs vary by school, but affordable online programs make advancing your career more accessible than ever.

Related online degrees offer flexible, accredited routes into professional practice, making them attractive for neuroscience graduates seeking versatile and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Florian Waszak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles