World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6695 6237 58 56 267 8269

Pascal Mamassian publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pascal Mamassian between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pascal Mamassian published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2010. 28 of the 340 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2010. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 55 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 15 publications
1992 2025

340 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pascal Mamassian: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 2
1996 9
1997 4
1998 3
1999 0
2000 1
2001 3
2002 7
2003 5
2004 14
2005 8
2006 2
2007 9
2008 7
2009 4
2010 55
2011 11
2012 17
2013 7
2014 14
2015 12
2016 7
2017 13
2018 19
2019 14
2020 13
2021 15
2022 19
2023 14
2024 13
2025 15
Total 340
Download as CSV

Pascal Mamassian publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pascal Mamassian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 267 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171 267
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Pascal Mamassian D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pascal Mamassian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pascal Mamassian is affiliated with the École Normale Supérieure in France. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their work also touches on related areas such as computer vision and pattern recognition, social psychology, and atomic and molecular physics and optics.

The scientist's publication record includes frequent contributions to numerous journals and platforms. The most common venues for their publications are the Journal of Vision, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Perception, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and PLoS Computational Biology.

Pascal Mamassian's research covers several main topics within visual and neural sciences. These include:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Face recognition and perception
  • Color perception and design
  • Visual attention and saliency detection

Selected recent papers by Pascal Mamassian and collaborators include:

  • "Confidence controls perceptual evidence accumulation" (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • "Modeling perceptual confidence and the confidence forced-choice paradigm." (2021), published in Psychological Review
  • "Confidence Forced-Choice and Other Metaperceptual Tasks*" (2020), published in Perception
  • "Consensus Goals in the Field of Visual Metacognition" (2022), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Priors and payoffs in confidence judgments" (2020), published in Attention Perception & Psychophysics

The scientist has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include Vincent de Gardelle, Jonathan Vacher, Tarryn Balsdon, Shannon M. Locke, and Lena Klever. The co-authorships reflect ongoing collaborative research efforts in related fields of perceptual confidence and metacognition.

Best Publications

  • Object Perception as Bayesian Inference

    Daniel Kersten;Pascal Mamassian;Alan L Yuille

  • Multisensory processing in review: From physiology to behaviour

    David Alais;Fiona N. Newell;Pascal Mamassian

  • The perception of cast shadows

    Pascal Mamassian;David C. Knill;Daniel Kersten

  • Bayesian decision theory as a model of human visual perception: Testing Bayesian transfer

    Laurence T. Maloney;Pascal Mamassian

  • Prior knowledge on the illumination position

    Pascal Mamassian;Ross Goutcher

  • Moving Cast Shadows Induce Apparent Motion in Depth

    Daniel Kersten;Pascal Mamassian;David C Knill

  • Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings

    Pascal Mamassian;Michael S Landy

  • A New Look at Sensory Attenuation Action-Effect Anticipation Affects Sensitivity, Not Response Bias

    Pedro Cardoso-Leite;Pedro Cardoso-Leite;Pascal Mamassian;Simone Schütz-Bosbach;Florian Waszak

  • Does Confidence Use a Common Currency Across Two Visual Tasks

    Vincent de Gardelle;Vincent de Gardelle;Pascal Mamassian;Pascal Mamassian

  • Predictive Properties of Visual Adaptation

    Adrien Chopin;Adrien Chopin;Pascal Mamassian;Pascal Mamassian

  • Visual Confidence

    Unknown

  • Ambiguities and conventions in the perception of visual art

    Pascal Mamassian

  • Confidence controls perceptual evidence accumulation

    Tarryn Balsdon;Valentin Wyart;Pascal Mamassian

  • Interaction of visual prior constraints.

    Pascal Mamassian;Michael S Landy

  • Noise and Correlations in Parallel Perceptual Decision Making

    Thomas U U. Otto;Thomas U U. Otto;Pascal Mamassian;Pascal Mamassian

  • Principles of multisensory behavior.

    Thomas U. Otto;Brice Dassy;Brice Dassy;Brice Dassy;Pascal Mamassian;Pascal Mamassian

  • Temporal dynamics in bistable perception.

    Pascal Mamassian;Ross Goutcher

  • Weighting mean and variability during confidence judgments.

    Vincent de Gardelle;Pascal Mamassian

  • Structure learning and the Occam's razor principle: a new view of human function acquisition

    Devika Narain;Devika Narain;Jeroen B. J. Smeets;Pascal Mamassian;Eli Brenner

  • Flexible mechanisms underlie the evaluation of visual confidence

    Simon Barthelmé;Pascal Mamassian

  • 1 Bayesian Modelling of Visual Perception

    Pascal Mamassian;Michael Landy;Laurence T. Maloney

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael S. Landy
Michael S. Landy New York University
Guillaume S. Masson
Guillaume S. Masson Aix-Marseille University
Daniel Kersten
Daniel Kersten University of Minnesota
Laurence T. Maloney
Laurence T. Maloney New York University
David C. Knill
David C. Knill University of Rochester
Eli Brenner
Eli Brenner Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Florian Waszak
Florian Waszak Université Paris Cité
Jeroen B. J. Smeets
Jeroen B. J. Smeets Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
David Alais
David Alais University of Sydney
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering studying Psychology in the USA, there are many related online degrees and career pathways worth exploring. One popular and impactful field is Speech-Language Pathology. Professionals in this area help individuals overcome communication and swallowing disorders, offering vital support across educational, medical, and private practice settings.

Requirements for becoming a speech-language pathologist can vary by state. For instance, Hawaii slp certification requirements emphasize graduate education and supervised clinical hours. If you are interested in the slp requirements in Idaho, you’ll find that state standards include obtaining a master’s degree and passing a national examination.

Aspiring professionals should also look at region-specific guidance, such as the steps to becoming a speech therapist in Illinois or the process for becoming a speech therapist in Indiana. These examples show how requirements can differ depending on your location.

Exploring these pathways not only broadens your career options but also allows you to make a positive impact on people’s lives—whether through online study or in-person roles.

Best Scientists Citing Pascal Mamassian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles