World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
12247
World Ranking
8181
National Ranking
3507

David C. Knill publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Knill sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 120 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David C. Knill D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Knill sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

David C. Knill was affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States. Their research career is noted without specific details about recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues, reflecting a more limited accessible record of their scholarly outputs in the available data.

The scientist's primary record does not list explicit main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work. Similarly, their catalog of papers does not provide titles, publication years, or venues, which implies that such data is either not available or not recorded in the accessible sources.

Information about their frequent collaborators and usual publication venues is absent. There is also no recorded list of book publications or associated publishers.

Details about awards or honors conferred upon David C. Knill were not provided, and the year of award or citation for any potential recognitions is not documented in the current dataset.

The absence of more detailed academic production or highlighted research themes means that the profile is limited to the acknowledgment of their academic affiliation and the fact that they have passed away.

Best Publications

  • The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation

    David C. Knill;Alexandre Pouget

  • Perception as Bayesian Inference

    David C. Knill;Whitman Richards

  • Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant

    David C. Knill;Jeffrey A. Saunders

  • Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review

    Dennis M. Levi;David C. Knill;Daphne Bavelier

  • Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements

    Jeffrey A. Saunders;David C. Knill

  • Visual Feedback Control of Hand Movements

    Jeffrey A. Saunders;David C. Knill

  • The perception of cast shadows

    Pascal Mamassian;David C. Knill;Daniel Kersten

  • APPARENT SURFACE CURVATURE AFFECTS LIGHTNESS PERCEPTION

    David C. Knill;Daniel Kersten

  • Human discrimination of fractal images

    David C. Knill;David Field;Daniel Kerstent

  • Moving Cast Shadows Induce Apparent Motion in Depth

    Daniel Kersten;Pascal Mamassian;David C Knill

  • Illusory motion from shadows

    Daniel Kersten;David C. Knill;Pascal Mamassian;Isabella Bülthoff

  • An ideal observer analysis of visual working memory.

    Chris R. Sims;Robert A. Jacobs;David C. Knill

  • Robust cue integration: a Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant.

    David C. Knill

  • Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements.

    Jeffrey A. Saunders;David C. Knill

  • Object classification for human and ideal observers

    Zili Liu;David C. Knill;Daniel Kersten

  • Discrimination of planar surface slant from texture: human and ideal observers compared

    David C. Knill

  • Bayesian sampling in visual perception

    Rubén Moreno-Bote;David C. Knill;Alexandre Pouget

  • Surface orientation from texture: ideal observers, generic observers and the information content of texture cues

    David C. Knill

  • Ideal-Observer Models of Cue Integration

    Michael S. Landy;Martin S. Banks;David C. Knill

  • Reaching for visual cues to depth: the brain combines depth cues differently for motor control and perception.

    David C. Knill

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Kersten
Daniel Kersten University of Minnesota
Pascal Mamassian
Pascal Mamassian École Normale Supérieure
Robert A. Jacobs
Robert A. Jacobs University of Rochester
Daphne Bavelier
Daphne Bavelier University of Geneva
Dennis M. Levi
Dennis M. Levi University of California, Berkeley
Duje Tadin
Duje Tadin University of Rochester
Paul Schrater
Paul Schrater University of Minnesota
Marc O. Ernst
Marc O. Ernst University of Ulm
Eero P. Simoncelli
Eero P. Simoncelli New York University
Richard N. Aslin
Richard N. Aslin Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science can open doors to various online degree options and career pathways. For students seeking a quick start, considering the easiest associate degree to get may provide a streamlined path into the tech industry or further study.

Those interested in advancing their education can look into the best online edd programs to specialize in educational technology or administration within the digital world.

Choosing an institution plays a crucial role as well. Selecting from the best online accredited universities ensures you receive a recognized and reputable education that is widely accepted by employers.

For those passionate about gaming, an online school for game design can provide the specialized skills needed to enter this creative and expanding field.

With so many affordable and flexible online options, students can tailor their journey in computer science or related careers according to their interests and long-term goals.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Knill

Recently Published Articles