World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patricia A. Ganea

Patricia A. Ganea

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10977 10274 764 717 80 3731

Patricia A. Ganea publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patricia A. Ganea between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patricia A. Ganea published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2019. 5 of the 86 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2019. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
2004 2025

86 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patricia A. Ganea: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 3
2008 2
2009 1
2010 3
2011 4
2012 3
2013 5
2014 8
2015 4
2016 5
2017 5
2018 7
2019 9
2020 6
2021 7
2022 5
2023 2
2024 1
2025 4
Total 86
Download as CSV

Patricia A. Ganea publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Ganea sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 80
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Patricia A. Ganea D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia A. Ganea sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Patricia A. Ganea is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to research in psychology and social sciences. Their work primarily focuses on developmental and educational psychology, education, experimental and cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's publications cover a range of topics including child and animal learning development, child development and digital technology, educational strategies and epistemologies, science education and pedagogy, language development and disorders, reading and literacy development, and cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills.

Frequent publication venues for Patricia A. Ganea include the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Child Development, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Developmental Psychology, and Infant Behavior and Development.

Notable papers include:

  • The effect of object similarity and alignment of examples on children's learning and transfer from picture books, 2020, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • The Role of Alternative Theories and Anomalous Evidence in Children's Scientific Belief Revision, 2020, Child Development
  • Thinking about possibilities: mechanisms, ontogeny, functions and phylogeny, 2022, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Language as a mechanism for reasoning about possibilities, 2022, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • What is and what never should have been: Children's causal and counterfactual judgments about the same events, 2020, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Angela Nyhout, Vaunam P. Venkadasalam, Gabrielle A. Strouse, Nicole E. Larsen, and Begüm Özdemir.

Best Publications

  • Transfer between Picture Books and the Real World by Very Young Children

    Patricia A. Ganea;Megan Bloom Pickard;Judy S. DeLoache

  • Young Children Can Be Taught Basic Natural Selection Using a Picture-Storybook Intervention:

    Deborah Kelemen;Natalie A. Emmons;Rebecca Seston Schillaci;Patricia A. Ganea

  • Less is More: How manipulative features affect children's learning from picture books.

    Medha Tare;Cynthia Chiong;Patricia Ganea;Judy DeLoache

  • The Role of Book Features in Young Children's Transfer of Information from Picture Books to Real-World Contexts.

    Gabrielle A. Strouse;Angela Nyhout;Patricia A. Ganea

  • Young Children’s Learning and Transfer of Biological Information From Picture Books to Real Animals

    Patricia A. Ganea;Lili Ma;Judy S. DeLoache

  • Do cavies talk? The effect of anthropomorphic picture books on children's knowledge about animals

    Patricia A. Ganea;Caitlin F. Canfield;Kadria Simons-Ghafari;Tommy Chou

  • Toddlers' referential understanding of pictures.

    Patricia A. Ganea;Melissa L. Allen;Lucas Butler;Susan Carey

  • Learning to learn from stories: children's developing sensitivity to the causal structure of fictional worlds.

    Caren M. Walker;Alison Gopnik;Patricia A. Ganea

  • Mature counterfactual reasoning in 4- and 5-year-olds

    Angela Nyhout;Patricia A. Ganea

  • Thinking of Things Unseen: Infants' Use of Language to Update Mental Representations

    Patricia A. Ganea;Kristin Shutts;Elizabeth S. Spelke;Judy S. DeLoache

  • Infants interpret ambiguous requests for absent objects.

    Megan M. Saylor;Patricia Ganea

  • Dealing with conflicting information: young children's reliance on what they see versus what they are told.

    Lili Ma;Patricia A. Ganea

  • Infants' Use of Shared Linguistic Information to Clarify Ambiguous Requests

    Patricia A. Ganea;Megan M. Saylor

  • Contextual factors affect absent reference comprehension in 14-month-olds.

    Patricia A. Ganea

  • Do storybooks with anthropomorphized animal characters promote prosocial behaviors in young children

    Nicole E. Larsen;Kang Lee;Patricia A. Ganea

  • Parent–Toddler Behavior and Language Differ When Reading Electronic and Print Picture Books

    Gabrielle A. Strouse;Patricia A. Ganea

  • Possession is not always the law: With age, preschoolers increasingly use verbal information to identify who owns what

    Peter R. Blake;Patricia A. Ganea;Paul L. Harris

  • Toddlers' word learning and transfer from electronic and print books.

    Gabrielle A. Strouse;Patricia A. Ganea

  • What's mine is mine: twelve-month-olds use possessive pronouns to identify referents

    Megan M. Saylor;Patricia A. Ganea;Maria D. Vázquez

  • A print book preference: Caregivers report higher child enjoyment and more adult–child interactions when reading print than electronic books

    Gabrielle A. Strouse;Patricia A. Ganea

Frequent Co-Authors

Judy S. DeLoache
Judy S. DeLoache University of Virginia
Paul L. Harris
Paul L. Harris Harvard University
Alison Gopnik
Alison Gopnik University of California, Berkeley
Fanny Chevalier
Fanny Chevalier University of Toronto
Susan A. Graham
Susan A. Graham University of Calgary
Alice S. Carter
Alice S. Carter University of Massachusetts Boston
Susan Carey
Susan Carey Harvard University
Jennifer Jenkins
Jennifer Jenkins University of Toronto
Dedre Gentner
Dedre Gentner Northwestern University
Elizabeth S. Spelke
Elizabeth S. Spelke Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying psychology in the USA, pursuing an online degree can open doors to numerous career pathways. Many students aim to become school counselors, and each state has its own specific certification requirements. For example, understanding Ohio school counselor certification requirements can help you map out your education and licensure steps if you plan to work in Ohio.

Other states follow a similar but distinct process. If you’re considering Oklahoma, it’s important to be aware of the requirements to be a school counselor in Oklahoma, which may include specific coursework and practicum experiences. Meanwhile, for those drawn to the Pacific Northwest, research how to become a school counselor in Oregon to ensure your academic planning aligns with state regulations.

Pennsylvania also has unique rules and guidelines you must follow. You can discover more about how to become a school counselor in Pennsylvania to prepare for your chosen path. No matter where you wish to practice, understanding state-specific requirements is crucial for a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia A. Ganea

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles