World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
18476
World Ranking
4099
National Ranking
1862

Robert S. Sloviter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert S. Sloviter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 93 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert S. Sloviter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert S. Sloviter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Robert S. Sloviter is a researcher affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their work is primarily situated in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with contributions spanning Psychiatry and Mental Health, Infectious Diseases, and Clinical Biochemistry.

The topics central to Sloviter's research include epilepsy research and treatment, infectious encephalopathies and encephalitis, as well as metabolism and genetic disorders. These focus areas frame much of their scholarly output and scientific inquiry.

Sloviter has contributed to the academic community through publications in reputable venues such as the Journal of Neurology. One recent paper, titled Retrospective discrimination of PNES and epileptic seizure types using blood RNA signatures, was published in 2025 in the Journal of Neurology.

Collaborations feature prominently in Sloviter's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Katie L. Bullinger
  • Monica B. Dhakar
  • Andrea Pearson
  • Argyle V. Bumanglag
  • Emine Seda Güvendağ Güven

The scientist has been recognized with the award of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), achieved in 1998.

Best Publications

  • Dentate Granule Cell Neurogenesis Is Increased by Seizures and Contributes to Aberrant Network Reorganization in the Adult Rat Hippocampus

    Jack M. Parent;Timothy W. Yu;Rebecca T. Leibowitz;Daniel H. Geschwind

  • Synaptic Activity Regulates Interstitial Fluid Amyloid-β Levels In Vivo

    John R. Cirrito;Kelvin A. Yamada;Mary Beth Finn;Robert S. Sloviter

  • Decreased hippocampal inhibition and a selective loss of interneurons in experimental epilepsy.

    Robert S. Sloviter

  • Calcium-binding protein (calbindin-D28k) and parvalbumin immunocytochemistry: localization in the rat hippocampus with specific reference to the selective vulnerability of hippocampal neurons to seizure activity.

    Robert S. Sloviter

  • Permanently altered hippocampal structure, excitability, and inhibition after experimental status epilepticus in the rat: the "dormant basket cell" hypothesis and its possible relevance to temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Robert S. Sloviter

  • Selective loss of hippocampal granule cells in the mature rat brain after adrenalectomy.

    Robert S. Sloviter;Guy Valiquette;Guy Valiquette;Gary M. Abrams;Gary M. Abrams;Edward C. Ronk

  • “Epileptic” brain damage in rats induced by sustained electrical stimulation of the perforant path. I. Acute electrophysiological and light microscopic studies

    Robert S. Sloviter

  • Immunocytochemical localization of GABA-, cholecystokinin-, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-, and somatostatin-like immunoreactivity in the area dentata and hippocampus of the rat

    Robert S. Sloviter;Robert S. Sloviter;Gajanan Nilaver;Gajanan Nilaver

  • The functional organization of the hippocampal dentate gyrus and its relevance to the pathogenesis of temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Robert S. Sloviter

  • Excitotoxic mechanisms of epileptic brain damage.

    J W Olney;R C Collins;R S Sloviter

  • Possible functional consequences of synaptic reorganization in the dentate gyrus of kainate-treated rats.

    Robert S. Sloviter;Robert S. Sloviter

  • Calcium-binding protein (calbindin-D28K) and parvalbumin immunocytochemistry in the normal and epileptic human hippocampus.

    Robert S. Sloviter;Robert S. Sloviter;Anne L. Sollas;Nicholas M. Barbaro;Kenneth D. Laxer

  • Basal expression and induction of glutamate decarboxylase GABA in excitatory granule cells of the rat and monkey hippocampal dentate gyrus

    Robert S. Sloviter;Marc A. Dichter;Tara L. Rachinsky;Evelyn Dean

  • Commonalities in epileptogenic processes from different acute brain insults: Do they translate?

    Pavel Klein;Raymond Dingledine;Eleonora Aronica;Christophe Bernard

  • "Dormant basket cell" hypothesis revisited: relative vulnerabilities of dentate gyrus mossy cells and inhibitory interneurons after hippocampal status epilepticus in the rat.

    Robert S. Sloviter;Colin A. Zappone;Brian D. Harvey;Argyle V. Bumanglag

  • “Epileptic” brain damage is replicated qualitatively in the rat hippocampus by central injection of glutamate or aspartate but not by GABA or acetylcholine

    Robert S. Sloviter;David W. Dempster

  • Apoptosis and necrosis induced in different hippocampal neuron populations by repetitive perforant path stimulation in the rat

    Robert S. Sloviter;Evelyn Dean;Anne L. Sollas;Jeffrey H. Goodman

  • A selective loss of hippocampal mossy fiber Timm stain accompanies granule cell seizure activity induced by perforant path stimulation.

    Robert S. Sloviter

  • A simplified timm stain procedure compatible with formaldehyde fixation and routine paraffin embedding of rat brain

    Robert S. Sloviter

  • Sustained electrical stimulation of the perforant path duplicates kainate-induced electrophysiological effects and hippocampal damage in rats

    Robert S. Sloviter;Bruce P. Damiano

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Frotscher
Michael Frotscher Universität Hamburg
Robert Schwarcz
Robert Schwarcz University of Maryland, Baltimore
Jeffrey H. Goodman
Jeffrey H. Goodman SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Kenneth D. Laxer
Kenneth D. Laxer Sutter Health
Timothy A. Pedley
Timothy A. Pedley Columbia University
Gary W. Abrams
Gary W. Abrams Wayne State University
Nicholas M. Barbaro
Nicholas M. Barbaro The University of Texas at Austin
David M. Holtzman
David M. Holtzman Washington University in St. Louis
Kelvin A. Yamada
Kelvin A. Yamada Washington University in St. Louis
Daniel H. Geschwind
Daniel H. Geschwind University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA can open doors to numerous related fields and professional pathways—many of which now offer flexible online degree options. For those interested in client-focused therapy, consider pursuing an mft degree to specialize in marriage and family therapy. This option allows graduates to blend neuroscience insights with therapeutic practices.

If you’re keen to dig deeper into the science of behavior and mental health, a master in psychology online enables advanced study and opens doors to research or clinical practice roles. For a broader education that can lead to many entry-level mental health positions, an accredited online psychology degree is a versatile option.

Additionally, if you are passionate about advocacy or supporting individuals in a social context, an online master’s in social work may be ideal. Each of these pathways complements neuroscience studies by adding applied practice skills, flexibility, and expanded career options, all accessible through accredited online programs.

Best Scientists Citing Robert S. Sloviter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles