World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Frotscher

Michael Frotscher

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 108 591 40 360 41112

Michael Frotscher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael Frotscher between 1977 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael Frotscher published across 45 years, from 1977 to 2021, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2006. 5 of the 379 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2006. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 1 publication
1977 2021

379 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael Frotscher: publications per year, 1977 to 2021
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 4
1984 3
1985 3
1986 7
1987 5
1988 9
1989 10
1990 8
1991 10
1992 12
1993 14
1994 13
1995 10
1996 18
1997 19
1998 8
1999 9
2000 14
2001 7
2002 12
2003 10
2004 14
2005 11
2006 22
2007 13
2008 3
2009 19
2010 12
2011 8
2012 17
2013 6
2014 7
2015 8
2016 7
2017 11
2018 3
2019 5
2020 4
2021 1
Total 379
Download as CSV

Michael Frotscher publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Frotscher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 358–367 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 360 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66 360
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael Frotscher D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Frotscher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50 108
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Michael Frotscher was affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany. Their research spanned multiple academic fields, primarily focusing on Arts and Humanities, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Neuroscience.

Their work covered several subfields, including Language and Linguistics, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology, and Developmental Neuroscience. Key research topics addressed by Frotscher included Linguistics and language evolution, Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Photoreceptor and optogenetics research, Historical Linguistics and Language Studies, and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions.

Frotscher's frequent co-authors were Sang Hun Lee, David Lutz, Dagmar Drexler, Jie Shen, and Pascal Coenen. These collaborations contributed to publications in various scientific journals and venues.

Their published papers include the following:

  • "Differential modulation of short-term plasticity at hippocampal mossy fiber and Schaffer collateral synapses by mitochondrial Ca2+", 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "The nominative/vocative plural of Vedic masculine a-stems in complex nominal expressions", 2020, Indogermanische Forschungen
  • "Phosphorylation of Focal Adhesion Kinase at Y925: Role in Glia-Dependent and Independent Migration through Regulating Cofilin and N-Cadherin", 2022, Molecular Neurobiology
  • "Indo-European Inroads into the Syntactic-Etymological Interface: A Reconstruction of the PIE verbal root menkʷ- 'to be short; to lack' and its Argument Structure", 2020, Historical Linguistics

Frotscher's research appeared in journals such as PLoS ONE, Indogermanische Forschungen, Molecular Neurobiology, and Historical Linguistics, each reflecting different aspects of their multidisciplinary work.

In recognition of their contributions to science, Frotscher was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs

    Henry Markram;Joachim Lübke;Michael Frotscher;Bert Sakmann

  • Physiology and anatomy of synaptic connections between thick tufted pyramidal neurones in the developing rat neocortex.

    Henry Markram;Joachim H. R. Lübke;Michael Frotscher;Arnd Roth

  • Importance of AMPA receptors for hippocampal synaptic plasticity but not for spatial learning.

    Daniel Zamanillo;Rolf Sprengel;Øivind Hvalby;Vidar Jensen

  • Targeting gene-modified hematopoietic cells to the central nervous system: Use of green fluorescent protein uncovers microglial engraftment

    Josef Priller;Alexander FLüGEL;T. I. M. Wehner;Matthias Boentert

  • Cholinergic innervation of the rat hippocampus as revealed by choline acetyltransferase immunocytochemistry: A combined light and electron microscopic study

    Unknown

  • Fast synaptic inhibition promotes synchronized gamma oscillations in hippocampal interneuron networks.

    Marlene Bartos;Imre Vida;Michael Frotscher;Axel Meyer

  • Modulation of synaptic plasticity and memory by Reelin involves differential splicing of the lipoprotein receptor Apoer2.

    Uwe Beffert;Edwin J. Weeber;Andre Durudas;Shenfeng Qiu

  • A role for Cajal–Retzius cells and reelin in the development of hippocampal connections

    José A. Del Río;Bernd Heimrich;Víctor Borrell;Eckart Förster

  • Hippocampal Synapses Depend on Hippocampal Estrogen Synthesis

    Oliver Kretz;Lars Fester;Uwe Wehrenberg;Lepu Zhou

  • Three-dimensional reconstruction of a calyx of Held and its postsynaptic principal neuron in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body.

    Kurt Sätzler;Kurt Sätzler;Leander F. Söhl;Johann H. Bollmann;J. Gerard G. Borst

  • Defining the actual sensitivity and specificity of the neurosphere assay in stem cell biology

    Ilyas Singec;Ilyas Singec;Rolf Knoth;Ralf P Meyer;Jaroslaw Maciaczyk

  • Submillisecond AMPA receptor-mediated signaling at a principal neuron-interneuron synapse

    Jörg R. P. Geiger;Joachim H. R. Lübke;Arnd Roth;Michael Frotscher

  • Adult generation of glutamatergic olfactory bulb interneurons

    Monika S Brill;Jovica Ninkovic;Eleanor Winpenny;Rebecca D Hodge

  • BDNF and its pro-peptide are stored in presynaptic dense core vesicles in brain neurons.

    Sandra Dieni;Tomoya Matsumoto;Martijn Dekkers;Stefanie Rauskolb

  • Cajal—Retzius cells, Reelin, and the formation of layers

    Michael Frotscher

  • Reelin, Disabled 1, and β1 integrins are required for the formation of the radial glial scaffold in the hippocampus

    Eckart Förster;Albrecht Tielsch;Barbara Saum;Karl Heinz Weiss

  • Neuronal Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins (NEX and BETA2/Neuro D) Regulate Terminal Granule Cell Differentiation in the Hippocampus

    Markus H. Schwab;Angelika Bartholomae;Bernd Heimrich;Dirk Feldmeyer

  • Rapid signaling at inhibitory synapses in a dentate gyrus interneuron network.

    Marlene Bartos;Imre Vida;Michael Frotscher;Jörg R. P. Geiger

  • Reelin deficiency and displacement of mature neurons, but not neurogenesis, underlie the formation of granule cell dispersion in the epileptic hippocampus.

    Christophe Heinrich;Naoki Nitta;Armin Flubacher;Martin Müller

  • Synaptopodin-deficient mice lack a spine apparatus and show deficits in synaptic plasticity.

    Thomas Deller;Martin Korte;Sophie Chabanis;Alexander Drakew

  • Subcellular localization of metabotropic GABA(B) receptor subunits GABA(B1a/b) and GABA(B2) in the rat hippocampus.

    Ákos Kulik;Imre Vida;Rafael Luján;Carola A. Haas

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernd Heimrich
Bernd Heimrich University of Freiburg
Joachim Herz
Joachim Herz The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Joachim H. R. Lübke
Joachim H. R. Lübke Forschungszentrum Jülich
Peter Jonas
Peter Jonas Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Roland A. Bender
Roland A. Bender Universität Hamburg
Eduardo Soriano
Eduardo Soriano University of Barcelona
Robert Nitsch
Robert Nitsch University of Münster
Robert S. Sloviter
Robert S. Sloviter University of Arizona
Imre Vida
Imre Vida Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Gabriele M. Rune
Gabriele M. Rune Universität Hamburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open the door to many academic and professional opportunities, especially when considering flexible online learning. Many students opt for an online bachelor's degree, which can offer both convenience and an accelerated path to entry-level neuroscience or related positions. If you’re interested in psychology, pursuing an online psy d program is a popular route for those aiming for clinical roles or licensure.

For individuals drawn to counseling and therapy within the mental health field, various mft programs online allow you to specialize in marriage and family therapy, often with flexible, accelerated courses. Additionally, if earning potential is a key factor, reviewing the best bachelor degrees to get can help you align your studies with high-demand and high-paying fields.

No matter your pathway, online degrees provide diverse options to fit your career goals in neuroscience, psychology, or counseling while offering the flexibility and accessibility that modern students need.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Frotscher

Recently Published Articles