World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steven A. Williams

Steven A. Williams

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
46
Citations
6275
World Ranking
19008
National Ranking
7760

Steven A. Williams publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven A. Williams sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 136 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Steven A. Williams D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven A. Williams sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven A. Williams is affiliated with Smith College in the United States and has an extensive body of work in the fields of immunology and microbiology, with significant contributions to medicine.

Their research spans several subfields, including parasitology, ecology, infectious diseases, public health, environmental and occupational health, and insect science.

The scientist's work covers various main topics such as parasites and host interactions, parasite biology and host interactions, parasitic infections and diagnostics, parasitic diseases research and treatment, insect symbiosis and bacterial influences, helminth infection and control, and mosquito-borne diseases and control.

Notable recent publications by Steven A. Williams include:

  • Comparison of multi-parallel qPCR and double-slide Kato-Katz for detection of soil-transmitted helminth infection among children in rural Bangladesh, 2020, PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • First international external quality assessment scheme of nucleic acid amplification tests for the detection of Schistosoma and soil-transmitted helminths, including Strongyloides: A pilot study, 2020, PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • What does soil-transmitted helminth elimination look like? Results from a targeted molecular detection survey in Japan, 2020, Parasites & Vectors
  • Evaluating Molecular Xenomonitoring as a Tool for Lymphatic Filariasis Surveillance in Samoa, 2018-2019, 2022, Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
  • Selection and exploitation of prevalent, tandemly repeated genomic targets for improved real-time PCR-based detection of Wuchereria bancrofti and Plasmodium falciparum in mosquitoes, 2020, PLoS ONE

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Steven A. Williams include:

  • Nils Pilotte
  • Jessica R. Grant
  • Jade Benjamin-Chung
  • Jacqueline R. M. A. Maasch
  • Andrew M. Gonzalez

Steven A. Williams has published extensively in venues such as:

  • PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Parasites & Vectors
  • Gates Open Research

Best Publications

  • Draft Genome of the Filarial Nematode Parasite Brugia malayi

    Elodie Ghedin;Elodie Ghedin;Shiliang Wang;David Spiro;Elisabet Caler

  • Molecular phylogenetic studies on filarial parasites based on 5S ribosomal spacer sequences

    Hong Xie;O. Bain;Steven A. Williams;Steven A. Williams

  • A real-time PCR-based assay for detection of Wuchereria bancrofti DNA in blood and mosquitoes.

    Ramakrishna U. Rao;Laura J. Atkinson;Reda M.R. Ramzy;Hanan H. Helmy

  • A Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of the Parasite Wuchereria bancrofti in Human Blood Samples

    Min Zhong;James McCarthy;Louann Bierwert;Michelle Lizotte-Waniewski

  • Cloning and comparison of repeated DNA sequences from the human filarial parasite Brugia malayi and the animal parasite Brugia pahangi

    Larry A. McReynolds;Susan M. Desimone;Steven A. Williams

  • Identification of Potential Vaccine and Drug Target Candidates by Expressed Sequence Tag Analysis and Immunoscreening of Onchocerca volvulus Larval cDNA Libraries

    Michelle Lizotte-Waniewski;Michelle Lizotte-Waniewski;Wilson Tawe;David B. Guiliano;Wenhong Lu;Wenhong Lu

  • Improved PCR-Based Detection of Soil Transmitted Helminth Infections Using a Next-Generation Sequencing Approach to Assay Design

    Nils Pilotte;Nils Pilotte;Marina Papaiakovou;Jessica R. Grant;Lou Ann Bierwert

  • The impact of repeated rounds of mass drug administration with diethylcarbamazine plus albendazole on bancroftian filariasis in Papua New Guinea.

    Gary J. Weil;Will Kastens;Melinda Susapu;Sandra J. Laney

  • Genes expressed in Brugia malayi infective third stage larvae

    Mark L. Blaxter;Nithyakalyani Raghavan;Inca Ghosh;David Guiliano

  • A Multicenter Evaluation of Diagnostic Tools to Define Endpoints for Programs to Eliminate Bancroftian Filariasis

    Katherine Gass;Madsen V.E. Beau de Rochars;Daniel Boakye;Mark Bradley

  • A polymerase chain reaction-based assay for detection of Wuchereria bancrofti in human blood and Culex pipiens

    Reda M.R. Ramzy;Hoda A. Farid;Ibrahim H. Kamal;Ghada H. Ibrahim

  • A polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Brugia malayi in blood

    Michelle R. Lizotte;Taniawati Supali;Felix Partono;Steven A. Williams

  • The filarial genome project: Analysis of the nuclear, mitochondrial and endosymbiont genomes of Brugia malayi

    S.A. Williams;M.R. Lizotte-Waniewski;M.R. Lizotte-Waniewski;J. Foster;D. Guiliano

  • A Community-Based Study of Factors Associated with Continuing Transmission of Lymphatic Filariasis in Leogane, Haiti

    Alexis Boyd;Kimberly Y. Won;Shannon K. McClintock;Catherine V. Donovan

  • Determinants of success in national programs to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis: A perspective identifying essential elements and research needs

    Dominique Kyelem;Gautam Biswas;Moses J. Bockarie;Mark H. Bradley

  • Detection of Wuchereria bancrofti larvae in pools of mosquitoes by the polymerase chain reaction

    Suzanne Chanteau;Patrick Luquiaud;Anna-Bella Failloux;Steven A. Williams

  • Thioredoxin peroxidase from Onchocerca volvulus: a major hydrogen peroxide detoxifying enzyme in filarial parasites

    Wenhong Lu;Gillian L Egerton;Albert E Bianco;Steven A Williams;Steven A Williams

  • Characterization of a novel filarial serine protease inhibitor, Ov-SPI-1, from Onchocerca volvulus, with potential multifunctional roles during development of the parasite.

    Louise Ford;David B. Guiliano;Yelena Oksov;Asim K. Debnath

  • Development and standardization of a rapid, PCR-based method for the detection of Wuchereria bancrofti in mosquitoes, for xenomonitoring the human prevalence of bancroftian filariasis.

    S A Williams;S J Laney;L A Bierwert;L J Saunders

  • Cloning the Gene for the Malolactic Fermentation of Wine from Lactobacillus delbrueckii in Escherichia coli and Yeasts

    Steven A. Williams;Robert A. Hodges;Terry L. Strike;Richard Snow

Frequent Co-Authors

Barton E. Slatko
Barton E. Slatko Baylor College of Medicine
Stephen P. Luby
Stephen P. Luby Stanford University
Mark Blaxter
Mark Blaxter Wellcome Sanger Institute
Rashidul Haque
Rashidul Haque International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research
Gary J. Weil
Gary J. Weil Washington University in St. Louis
Thomas B. Nutman
Thomas B. Nutman National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
James S. McCarthy
James S. McCarthy Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Eric A. Ottesen
Eric A. Ottesen National Institutes of Health
Thomas R. Unnasch
Thomas R. Unnasch University of South Florida
Sara Lustigman
Sara Lustigman New York Blood Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to several dynamic online degrees and rewarding careers. If you’re looking to combine scientific knowledge with leadership, consider an affordable online MBA in healthcare management. This pathway can prepare you for management roles in hospitals, labs, and pharmaceutical companies, all while building on your science background.

For those interested in the technical side of healthcare, medical coding is a stable and in-demand career. Understanding the ccs vs cpc certification differences is crucial, as these credentials impact job options, salary potential, and industry specialization.

Curious about earning potential? Discover the latest medical coder salary insights, trends, and the educational steps required to enter this field. Additionally, it’s important to weigh the is medical coding a good career factors to determine if this pathway aligns with your skills and ambitions.

By considering these related degree programs and career avenues, you can use your scientific skills to build a flexible and impactful professional future in healthcare and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Steven A. Williams

Trending Scientists