World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles E. Smith

Charles E. Smith

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
8555
World Ranking
16799
National Ranking
594

Charles E. Smith publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 130 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Charles E. Smith D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Smith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles E. Smith is a researcher affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their academic focus spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable work in several specialized subfields including Molecular Biology and Rheumatology. They have contributed to research on Oral Surgery, Urology, and Physiology as well.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of subjects, primarily centered on bone and dental protein studies as well as dental development and anomalies. Other areas of investigation include Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments, Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research, Gut microbiota and health, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research.

Key recent publications include:

  • MMP20-generated amelogenin cleavage products prevent formation of fan-shaped enamel malformations (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea as a Risk Factor for COVID-19 Severity-The Gut Microbiome as a Common Player Mediating Systemic Inflammation via Gut Barrier Dysfunction (2022, Cells)
  • Dentin defects caused by a Dspp−1 frameshift mutation are associated with the activation of autophagy (2023, Scientific Reports)
  • Localizations of Laminin Chains Suggest Their Multifaceted Functions in Mouse Tooth Development (2025, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • Citrate Transporter Expression and Localization: The Slc13a5Flag Mouse Model (2025, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)

Charles E. Smith frequently publishes in several academic venues, with multiple contributions to Scientific Reports and the International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Other publications have appeared in Cells, Equine Veterinary Education, and the Journal of Anatomy.

The scientist collaborates regularly with peers, including frequent coauthors such as James P. Simmer, Tian Liang, Jan C.-C. Hu, Chuhua Zhang, and John D. Bartlett.

Best Publications

  • Endocrine regulation of male fertility by the skeleton

    Franck Oury;Grzegorz Sumara;Olga Sumara;Mathieu Ferron

  • Morphological classification of rat incisor ameloblasts.

    H. Warshawsky;C. E. Smith

  • Surfing the wave, cycle, life history, and genes/proteins expressed by testicular germ cells. Part 1: Background to spermatogenesis, spermatogonia, and spermatocytes

    Louis Hermo;R.-Marc Pelletier;Daniel G. Cyr;Charles E. Smith

  • Regulation of Dental Enamel Shape and Hardness

    J.P. Simmer;P. Papagerakis;C.E. Smith;D.C. Fisher

  • Surfing the wave, cycle, life history, and genes/proteins expressed by testicular germ cells. Part 3: developmental changes in spermatid flagellum and cytoplasmic droplet and interaction of sperm with the zona pellucida and egg plasma membrane.

    Louis Hermo;R.-Marc Pelletier;Daniel G. Cyr;Charles E. Smith

  • Enamel defects and ameloblast-specific expression in Enam knock-out/lacZ knock-in mice

    Jan C.-C. Hu;Yuanyuan Hu;Charles E. Smith;Marc D. McKee

  • Surfing the wave, cycle, life history, and genes/proteins expressed by testicular germ cells. Part 2: Changes in spermatid organelles associated with development of spermatozoa

    Louis Hermo;R.-Marc Pelletier;Daniel G. Cyr;Charles E. Smith

  • Quantitative analysis of cell turnover in the enamel organ of the rat incisor. Evidence for ameloblast death immediately after enamel matrix secretion.

    C. E. Smith;H. Warshawsky

  • A method for sampling the stages of amelogenesis on mandibular rat incisors using the molars as a reference for dissection.

    C. E. Smith;A. Nanci

  • Cloning of rat amelotin and localization of the protein to the basal lamina of maturation stage ameloblasts and junctional epithelium.

    Pierre Moffatt;Charles E. Smith;René St-Arnaud;Darrin Simmons

  • Degradation and loss of matrix proteins from developing enamel.

    C. E. Smith;J. R. Pompura;S. Borenstein;A. Fazel

  • Comparative Immunochemical Analyses of the Developmental Expression and Distribution of Ameloblastin and Amelogenin in Rat Incisors

    A. Nanci;S. Zalzal;P. Lavoie;M. Kunikata

  • Ameloblasts: Secretory and Resorptive Functions

    C.E. Smith

  • Decreased Mineral Content in MMP-20 Null Mouse Enamel is Prominent During the Maturation Stage

    J.D. Bartlett;E. Beniash;D.H. Lee;C.E. Smith

  • A post-classical theory of enamel biomineralization… and why we need one

    James P. Simmer;Amelia S. Richardson;Yuan Yuan Hu;Charles E. Smith

  • Characterization of Apin, a secreted protein highly expressed in tooth-associated epithelia.

    Pierre Moffatt;Charles E. Smith;René St-Arnaud;René St-Arnaud;Antonio Nanci

  • Immunocytochemical and radioautographic evidence for secretion and intracellular degradation of enamel proteins by ameloblasts during the maturation stage of amelogenesis in rat incisors.

    Antonio Nanci;Harold C. Slavkin;Charles E. Smith

  • Movement of entire cell populations during renewal of the rat incisor as shown by radoioautography after labeling with 3H-thymidine. The concept of a continuously differentiating cross-sectional segment. (With an appendix on the development of the periodontal ligament).

    C. E. Smith;H. Warshawsky

  • Cyclic Induction and Rapid Movement of Sequential Waves of New Smooth-Ended Ameloblast Modulation Bands in Rat Incisors as Visualized By Polychrome Fluorescent Labeling and Gbha-Staining of Maturing Enamel

    C.E. Smith;M.D. McKee;A. Nanci

  • Protein dynamics of amelogenesis.

    Charles E. Smith;Antonio Nanci

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis Hermo
Louis Hermo McGill University
James P. Simmer
James P. Simmer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Antonio Nanci
Antonio Nanci University of Montreal
Daniel G. Cyr
Daniel G. Cyr University of Quebec
Jan C.-C. Hu
Jan C.-C. Hu University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
John D. Bartlett
John D. Bartlett The Ohio State University
John J. M. Bergeron
John J. M. Bergeron McGill University
Marc D. McKee
Marc D. McKee McGill University
Ira Kurtz
Ira Kurtz University of California, Los Angeles
René St-Arnaud
René St-Arnaud Shriners Hospitals for Children - Erie

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

There are a wide range of online degree programs and career avenues for students interested in Biology and Biochemistry. Flexible learning options make it easier than ever to start or advance your career in health and science fields while working or managing life’s other commitments.

If you’re already a medical assistant and seeking career progression, ma to lpn bridge programs online can help you become a licensed practical nurse with an accelerated curriculum. For those interested in a broader scientific foundation, an online bachelor's degree in biology offers core biological sciences along with valuable research skills.

Nursing remains a top choice for biology-focused students. registered nurse online programs let you begin or advance your nursing career, often with flexible schedules and clinical support. Similarly, if you’re drawn to food science and wellness, consider studying with some of the best online nutrition programs.

Each pathway balances convenience with rigorous academics, opening opportunities in healthcare, research, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Charles E. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles