World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
21160
World Ranking
3316
National Ranking
1871

Robert L. Linn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Linn sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 225 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert L. Linn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert L. Linn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 1997 - Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award, American Educational Research Association
  • 1993 - E. F. Lindquist Award, American Educational Research Association

Overview

Robert L. Linn was affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their academic work focused on education research, particularly in the area of assessments and accountability.

Their known publication record includes the paper titled Assessments and Accountability (Condensed version), published in 2020 by Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst). This paper has been cited seven times and reflects part of their contribution to educational assessment literature.

Robert L. Linn's frequent publication venue was Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst), where at least one of their works appeared.

The scientist did not have recorded coauthors in their documented research output.

Throughout their career, Robert L. Linn received several awards from the American Educational Research Association (AERA). These included:

  • Fellow of the American Educational Research Association, 2008
  • Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award, American Educational Research Association, 1997
  • E. F. Lindquist Award, American Educational Research Association, 1993

Robert L. Linn was recognized for their contributions to educational research and was acknowledged by their peers with multiple honors during their career.

Best Publications

  • Measurement and Assessment in Teaching

    Robert L. Linn;Norman Edward Gronlund

  • Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions

    C.E. Werts;R.L. Linn;K.G. Jöreskog

  • Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria

    Robert L. Linn;Eva L. Baker;Stephen B. Dunbar

  • Assessments and Accountability

    Robert L. Linn

  • Accountability Systems: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001:

    Robert L. Linn;Eva L. Baker;Damian W. Betebenner

  • Problems with the Use of Student Test Scores to Evaluate Teachers. EPI Briefing Paper #278.

    Eva L. Baker;Paul E. Barton;Linda Darling-Hammond;Edward Haertel

  • TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTS

    Bert F. Green;R. Darrell Bock;Lloyd G. Humphreys;Robert L. Linn

  • Performance-Based Assessment: Lessons From the Health Professions:

    David B. Swanson;Geoffrey R. Norman;Robert L. Linn

  • The Determination of the Significance of Change Between Pre- and Posttesting Periods

    Robert L. Linn;Jeffrey A. Slinde

  • Accountability: Responsibility and Reasonable Expectations

    Robert L. Linn

  • Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment.

    Eva L. Baker;Harold F. O'Neil;Robert L. Linn

  • Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices.

    Ledyard R Tucker;Raymond F. Koopman;Robert L. Linn

  • Educational Assessment: Expanded Expectations and Challenges

    Robert L. Linn

  • Fair Test Use in Selection

    Robert L. Linn

  • Path analysis: Psychological examples.

    Charles E. Werts;Robert L. Linn

  • Generalizability analysis for performance assessments of student achievement or school effectiveness

    Lee J. Cronbach;Robert L. Linn;Robert L. Brennan;Edward H. Haertel

  • Performance Assessment: Policy Promises and Technical Measurement Standards

    Robert L. Linn

  • A Monte Carlo approach to the number of factors problem.

    Robert Lee Linn

  • ANALYSIS OF ITEM RESPONSE PATTERNS. QUESTIONABLE TEST DATA AND DISSIMILAR CURRICULUM PRACTICES

    Delwyn L. Harnisch;Robert L. Linn

  • Performance-Based Assessment: Implications of Task Specificity

    Robert L. Linn;Elizabeth Burton

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald A. Rock
Donald A. Rock Princeton University
Karl G. Jöreskog
Karl G. Jöreskog Uppsala University
John A. Centra
John A. Centra Syracuse University
M. David Miller
M. David Miller University of Florida
Lorrie A. Shepard
Lorrie A. Shepard University of Colorado Boulder
Harold F. O'Neil
Harold F. O'Neil University of Southern California
Lloyd G. Humphreys
Lloyd G. Humphreys University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lee J. Cronbach
Lee J. Cronbach Stanford University
Stephen N. Elliott
Stephen N. Elliott Arizona State University
Linda Darling-Hammond
Linda Darling-Hammond Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens a wide range of online opportunities and career paths in counseling, therapy, and mental health services. Many students are now opting for flexible online programs, allowing them to balance work, study, and personal commitments while preparing for impactful roles.

If you’re considering further study, it’s important to look for programs offering high value and strong career prospects. For example, the best value counseling programs in Arizona are designed to combine affordability with comprehensive training. Similarly, prospective students can explore the best value counseling programs in Colorado for quality options that balance cost with career potential.

Those interested in the Southeast may want to investigate the most valuable counseling programs in Florida, known for their online accessibility and focus on practical skills. On the West Coast, the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Los Angeles identifies top programs for students seeking to work in a diverse, urban environment.

These pathways can lead to careers in clinical counseling, school psychology, social work, or specialized therapy, with options to study online or on campus to best fit your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Robert L. Linn

Recently Published Articles