World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6373 5922 3066 2798 83 8895

M. David Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M. David Miller between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M. David Miller published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2023. 10 of the 96 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2023. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
1986 2025

96 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M. David Miller: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 2
1988 2
1989 4
1990 3
1991 2
1992 2
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 2
1999 5
2000 2
2001 0
2002 3
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 2
2010 3
2011 0
2012 2
2013 5
2014 3
2015 2
2016 2
2017 4
2018 3
2019 4
2020 2
2021 5
2022 4
2023 6
2024 6
2025 4
Total 96
Download as CSV

M. David Miller publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. David Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 83 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 83
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

M. David Miller D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. David Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

M. David Miller is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States and focuses their research primarily within the fields of psychology and medicine. Their work intersects multiple subfields including education, general health professions, clinical psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The scientist's research addresses a variety of topics such as hearing impairment and communication, interpreting and communication in healthcare, childhood cancer survivors' quality of life, child abuse and trauma, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, emergency and acute care studies, as well as glioma diagnosis and treatment.

Recent publications by M. David Miller include the following:

  • "Emergency department utilization among deaf and hard-of-hearing patients: A retrospective chart review" (2022) published in Disability and Health Journal
  • "Child Safety Matters: Randomized Control Trial of a School-Based, Child Victimization Prevention Curriculum" (2020) published in Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • "Conceptual Model of Emergency Department Utilization among Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Patients: A Critical Review" (2021) published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "DEI Institutionalization: Measuring Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Postsecondary Education" (2023) published in Change The Magazine of Higher Learning
  • "Emergency department condition acuity, length of stay, and revisits among deaf and hard-of-hearing patients: A retrospective chart review" (2022) published in Academic Emergency Medicine

Their frequent coauthors include Raymond B. Mailhot Vega, Julie A. Bradley, Adeel Markatia, Erin M. Mobley, and Christopher G. Morris.

M. David Miller's contributions appear regularly in prominent academic journals. Common venues for their publications include the International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Change The Magazine of Higher Learning, Disability and Health Journal, and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

Best Publications

  • Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis.

    Frank Pajares;M. David Miller

  • Factors That Predict Teachers Staying in, Leaving, or Transferring from the Special Education Classroom

    M. David Miller;Mary T. Brownell;Stephen W. Smith

  • Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performances: The need for specificity of assessment.

    Frank Pajares;M. David Miller

  • The Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ): its factor structure, reliability, and validity.

    David L. Wood;Gregory S. Sawicki;M. David Miller;Carmen Smotherman

  • Gender differences in writing self-beliefs of elementary school students.

    Frank Pajares;M. David Miller;Margaret J. Johnson

  • Effects of a Reading Fluency Intervention for Middle Schoolers With Specific Learning Disabilities

    Cecil D. Mercer;Kenneth U. Campbell;M. David Miller;Kenneth D. Mercer

  • Teaching Algebra to Students with Learning Difficulties: An Investigation of an Explicit Instruction Model

    Bradley S. Witzel;Cecil D. Mercer;M. David Miller

  • Associations Between Physical Activity and Reduced Rates of Hopelessness, Depression, and Suicidal Behavior Among College Students

    Lindsay A. Taliaferro;Barbara A. Rienzo;R. Morgan Pigg;M. David Miller

  • High school youth and suicide risk: exploring protection afforded through physical activity and sport participation

    Lindsay A. Taliaferro;Barbara A. Rienzo;M. David Miller;R. Morgan Pigg

  • Cognitive behavior modification of hyperactivity–impulsivity and aggression: A meta-analysis of school-based studies.

    T. Rowand Robinson;Stephen W. Smith;M. David Miller;Mary T. Brownell

  • Spiritual Well-Being and Suicidal Ideation Among College Students

    Lindsay A. Taliaferro;Barbara A. Rienzo;R. Morgan Pigg;M. David Miller

  • Attrition in Special Education: Why Teachers Leave the Classroom and Where They Go.

    Mary T. Brownell;Stephen W. Smith;Janet R. McNellis;M. David Miller

  • Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Mathematical Problem Solving: Implications of Using Different Forms of Assessment

    Frank Pajares;M. David Miller

  • A systematic review of studies comparing body image concerns among female college athletes and non-athletes, 1997-2012.

    Julia R. Varnes;Michael L. Stellefson;Christopher M. Janelle;Steven M. Dorman

  • Traumatic Stress, Socioeconomic Status, and Academic Achievement Among Primary School Students

    Rachael D. Goodman;M. David Miller;Cirecie A. West-Olatunji

  • School-based cognitive-behavioral interventions in the treatment of aggression in the United States: A meta-analysis

    Tia N. Barnes;Stephen W. Smith;M. David Miller

  • An Examination of Racial/Ethnic and Gender Bias on Curriculum-Based Measurement of Reading.

    John H. Kranzler;M. David Miller;LuAnn Jordan

  • Conflict resolution and peer mediation in middle schools: extending the process and outcome knowledge base.

    Stephen W. Smith;Ann P. Daunic;M. David Miller;T. Rowand Robinson

  • Effect of sample size, number of biased items, and magnitude of bias on a two-stage item bias estimation method

    M. David Miller;T. C. Oshima

  • Multidimensionality and item bias in item response theory

    T.C. Oshima;M. David Miller

  • Electronic Health Literacy Across the Lifespan: Measurement Invariance Study.

    Samantha R Paige;M David Miller;Janice L Krieger;Michael Stellefson

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Pajares
Frank Pajares Emory University
Mary T. Brownell
Mary T. Brownell University of Florida
JeeWon Cheong
JeeWon Cheong University of Florida
Robert L. Linn
Robert L. Linn University of Colorado Boulder
Christopher M. Janelle
Christopher M. Janelle University of Florida
John H. Kranzler
John H. Kranzler University of Florida
Jay M. Bernhardt
Jay M. Bernhardt The University of Texas at Austin
Mary Louise Hemmeter
Mary Louise Hemmeter Vanderbilt University
Lise Fox
Lise Fox University of South Florida
Patricia Snyder
Patricia Snyder University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your education in Social Sciences and Humanities has never been more flexible, thanks to the increasing availability of online degree options. Students can fast-track their studies with one year online masters programs, which are ideal for working professionals wishing to upskill quickly and efficiently. These accelerated options can open doors to new roles without the long-term commitment required by traditional programs.

Similarly, those beginning their academic journey might consider accelerated online degrees that can be completed in less time than conventional bachelor’s programs. Such pathways appeal to motivated learners aiming to enter the workforce or pursue graduate study sooner.

For students focused on service-oriented careers, an msw degree (Master of Social Work) offers an affordable and flexible route into clinical social work, counseling, and advocacy. Additionally, those interested in behavioral therapy or working with individuals with autism may pursue bcba certification programs online, enabling career opportunities in educational and healthcare settings.

Each of these online pathways makes it easier to match your educational pursuits with your lifestyle, helping you advance your career in Social Sciences and Humanities with greater convenience and affordability.

Best Scientists Citing M. David Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles