World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
8427
World Ranking
4699
National Ranking
2231

Jay M. Bernhardt publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay M. Bernhardt sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 103 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jay M. Bernhardt D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay M. Bernhardt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jay M. Bernhardt is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their scholarly work spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on Medicine and Social Sciences with particular engagement in Communication, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, and Clinical Psychology.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Technology Use by Older Adults

Jay M. Bernhardt has contributed authorship to several recent papers, showcasing a focus on health communication, pain management, and technological challenges in healthcare:

  • "Applying Best Practices from Health Communication to Support a University's Response to COVID-19," 2020, published in Health Communication
  • "Nonpharmacologic Pain Management Among Hospitalized Inpatients," 2021, published in Clinical Journal of Pain
  • "Technological capital within aging United States-based populations: challenges and recommendations for online intervention uptake," 2021, published in Journal of Applied Communication Research
  • "Development of a health communication campaign to promote the Texas prescription monitoring program," 2020, published in Health Marketing Quarterly
  • "Reactions to a campus emergency: A text-mining analysis," 2020, published in Qualitative Research Reports in Communication

Frequent co-authors contributing alongside Jay M. Bernhardt in their publications include:

  • Michael Mackert
  • Jessica Wagner
  • Elizabeth M. Glowacki
  • Gary B. Wilcox
  • Billy Table

Their research has appeared repeatedly in established publication venues such as Health Communication, Clinical Journal of Pain, Journal of Applied Communication Research, Health Marketing Quarterly, and Qualitative Research Reports in Communication.

Best Publications

  • Mobile Text Messaging for Health: A Systematic Review of Reviews

    Amanda K. Hall;Heather Cole-Lewis;Jay Michael Bernhardt

  • Behavioral Functionality of Mobile Apps in Health Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Literature

    Hannah E Payne;Cameron Lister;Joshua H West;Jay M Bernhardt

  • Online pediatric information seeking among mothers of young children: results from a qualitative study using focus groups.

    Jay Michael Bernhardt;Elizabeth M. Felter;Elizabeth M. Felter

  • Communication at the core of effective public health.

    Jay Michael Bernhardt

  • A Prospective Study of Exposure to Rap Music Videos and African American Female Adolescents’ Health

    Gina M. Wingood;Ralph J. DiClemente;Jay Michael Bernhardt;Kathy Harrington

  • Health information-seeking behaviors, health indicators, and health risks.

    James B. Weaver;Darren Mays;Stephanie Sargent Weaver;Gary L. Hopkins

  • Crowdsourcing Applications for Public Health

    Daren C. Brabham;Kurt M. Ribisl;Thomas R. Kirchner;Jay Michael Bernhardt

  • Public health literacy in America: an ethical imperative.

    Julie A. Gazmararian;James W. Curran;Ruth M. Parker;Jay Michael Bernhardt

  • The Scientific Foundation for personal genomics: recommendations from a National Institutes of Health-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention multidisciplinary workshop.

    Muin J. Khoury;Muin J. Khoury;Colleen M. McBride;Sheri D. Schully;John P.A. Ioannidis;John P.A. Ioannidis

  • The Digital Health Divide Evaluating Online Health Information Access and Use Among Older Adults

    Amanda K. Hall;Jay Michael Bernhardt;Virginia Dodd;Morgan W. Vollrath

  • YouTube as a source of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education A social media content analysis

    Michael Stellefson;Beth Chaney;Kathleen Ochipa;Don Chaney

  • Detecting themes of public concern: a text mining analysis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Ebola live Twitter chat.

    Allison J. Lazard;Allison J. Lazard;Emily Scheinfeld;Jay Michael Bernhardt;Gary B Wilcox

  • Adolescents' experience with sex on the web: results from online focus groups.

    Kenzie A. Cameron;Laura F. Salazar;Jay Michael Bernhardt;Nan Burgess-Whitman

  • Using Wireless Handheld Computers and Tailored Text Messaging to Reduce Negative Consequences of Drinking Alcohol

    Jessica Aungst Weitzel;Jay Michael Bernhardt;Stuart Usdan;Stuart Usdan;Darren Mays

  • Stages of change and psychosocial correlates of fruit and vegetable consumption among rural African-American church members.

    Marci Kramish Campbell;Michael Symons;Wendy Demark-Wahnefried;Barbara Polhamus

  • Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertisements on Network Television: An Exploration of Quantity, Frequency, and Placement

    Erica D. Brownfield;Jay Michael Bernhardt;Jennifer L. Phan;Mark V. Williams

  • Reframing the dissemination challenge: a marketing and distribution perspective.

    Matthew W. Kreuter;Jay Michael Bernhardt

  • Mass media health communication campaigns combined with health-related product distribution: a community guide systematic review.

    Maren N. Robinson;Kristin A. Tansil;Randy W. Elder;Robin E. Soler

  • A social media primer for professionals: digital dos and don'ts.

    Jay M. Bernhardt;Julia Alber;Robert S. Gold

  • Perceived barriers to Internet-based health communication on human genetics.

    Jay Michael Bernhardt;Ruth Ann Weaver Lariscy;Roxanne L. Parrott;Kami J. Silk

Frequent Co-Authors

James B. Weaver
James B. Weaver Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Matthew W. Kreuter
Matthew W. Kreuter Washington University in St. Louis
Ralph J. DiClemente
Ralph J. DiClemente New York University
John P. Allegrante
John P. Allegrante Columbia University
M. David Miller
M. David Miller University of Florida
Daniela B. Friedman
Daniela B. Friedman University of South Carolina
Gina M. Wingood
Gina M. Wingood Columbia University
Kenzie A. Cameron
Kenzie A. Cameron Northwestern University
Laura F. Salazar
Laura F. Salazar Georgia State University
James R. Hébert
James R. Hébert University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The U.S. offers a range of flexible online degree options for students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities. Many students opt for programs such as an online masters in psychology, which can provide foundational skills for careers in counseling, research, and human resources.

Educators seeking leadership roles may consider edd programs that are offered online with accelerated pathways. These Ed.D. degrees prepare graduates for advanced positions in academia, administration, and policy-making.

Time-conscious learners can explore online master programs that can be completed in as little as one year. Such programs allow rapid career advancement without compromising education quality.

Undergraduate students may benefit from accelerated online programs, which help them earn their degree faster and start their careers sooner. These options make it easier to balance education with work or family commitments.

By choosing the right online degree pathway, students can tailor their education to meet personal, professional, and financial goals within the dynamic fields of Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Jay M. Bernhardt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles