World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charlotte Ringsted

Charlotte Ringsted

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
50
Citations
8117
World Ranking
2819
National Ranking
22

Charlotte Ringsted publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte Ringsted sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 194 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Charlotte Ringsted D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte Ringsted sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charlotte Ringsted is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with particular attention in subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Physiology.

The scientist's work covers several interconnected topics including:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Maternal and fetal healthcare

Notable recent publications authored or co-authored by Charlotte Ringsted include:

  • "Virtual Reality Simulation in Interprofessional Round Training for Health Care Students: A Qualitative Evaluation Study" (2020), published in Clinical Simulation in Nursing
  • "Wow, woo, win"- Healthcare students' and facilitators' experiences of interprofessional simulation in three-dimensional virtual world: A qualitative evaluation study (2021), Nurse Education Today
  • "Prehospital emergency nurses' experiences of care in critical incidents" (2020), International Emergency Nursing
  • "It was great to break down the walls between patient and provider": liminality in a co-produced advisory course for psychiatry residents" (2020), Advances in Health Sciences Education
  • "The myth of ivory tower versus practice-oriented research: A systematic review of randomised studies in medical education" (2020), Medical Education

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Martin G. Tolsgaard
  • Maria Rasmussen
  • Ellen Løkkegaard
  • Betina Ristorp Andersen
  • Karl Bang Christensen

Charlotte Ringsted has published repeatedly in venues such as:

  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Advances in Health Sciences Education
  • BMC Medical Education
  • Clinical Simulation in Nursing
  • Nurse Education Today

Best Publications

  • European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010.: Section 9. Principles of education in resuscitation.

    Jasmeet Soar;Koenraad G. Monsieurs;John H.W. Ballance;Alessandro Barelli

  • The effect of testing on skills learning.

    Charles B Kromann;Morten L Jensen;Charlotte Ringsted

  • ‘The research compass’: An introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 56

    Charlotte Ringsted;Brian D. Hodges;Albert Scherpbier

  • Student teachers can be as good as associate professors in teaching clinical skills.

    Martin G Tolsgaard;Amandus Gustafsson;Maria B Rasmussen;Pernilla Høiby

  • Anaesthetic practice and postoperative pulmonary complications

    T. Pedersen;J. Viby-Mogensen;C. Ringsted

  • International multispecialty consensus on how to evaluate ultrasound competence: a Delphi consensus survey.

    Martin G. Tolsgaard;Tobias Todsen;Jette L. Sorensen;Charlotte Ringsted

  • How to set the bar in competency-based medical education: standard setting after an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)

    Tim Dwyer;Tim Dwyer;Sarah Wright;Kulamakan Mahan Kulasegaram;John Theodoropoulos;John Theodoropoulos

  • Setting a research agenda for simulation-based healthcare education: a synthesis of the outcome from an Utstein style meeting.

    S. Barry Issenberg;Charlotte Ringsted;Doris Østergaard;Peter Dieckmann

  • Disseminating Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training by Distributing 35 000 Personal Manikins Among School Children

    Dan L. Isbye;Lars S. Rasmussen;Charlotte Ringsted;Freddy K. Lippert

  • Limitations of subjective cognitive load measures in simulation‐based procedural training

    Laura M Naismith;Jeffrey J H Cheung;Charlotte Ringsted;Charlotte Ringsted;Rodrigo B Cavalcanti;Rodrigo B Cavalcanti

  • Laypersons may learn basic life support in 24 min using a personal resuscitation manikin

    Dan Lou Isbye;Lars Simon Rasmussen;Freddy Knudsen Lippert;Søren Finnemann Rudolph

  • Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial.

    Jeanett Strandbygaard;Flemming Bjerrum;Mathilde Maagaard;Per Winkel

  • Gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills: a systematic review.

    Amir Ali;Yousif Subhi;Yousif Subhi;Charlotte Ringsted;Lars Konge

  • Are some of the challenging aspects of the CanMEDS roles valid outside Canada

    Charlotte Ringsted;Torben Lindskov Hansen;Deborah Davis;Albert Scherpbier

  • Reliable and valid assessment of competence in endoscopic ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

    L. Konge;P. Vilmann;P. Clementsen;J. T. Annema

  • The Testing Effect on Skills Learning Might Last 6 Months.

    C B Kromann;C Bohnstedt;M L Jensen;C Ringsted

  • Simulator training for endobronchial ultrasound: a randomised controlled trial.

    Lars Konge;Paul Frost Clementsen;Charlotte Ringsted;Valentina Minddal

  • Reliable and valid assessment of point-of-care ultrasonography.

    Tobias Todsen;Martin Grønnebæk Tolsgaard;Beth Härstedt Olsen;Birthe Merete Henriksen

  • Assessment of performance measures and learning curves for use of a virtual-reality ultrasound simulator in transvaginal ultrasound examination.

    M. E. Madsen;L. Konge;L. N. Nørgaard;A. Tabor

  • What an ambulance nurse needs to know: A content analysis of curricula in the specialist nursing programme in prehospital emergency care

    Helena Sjölin;Veronica Lindström;Håkan Hult;Charlotte Ringsted

Frequent Co-Authors

Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier Maastricht University
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten
Cees P. M. van der Vleuten Maastricht University
Brian Hodges
Brian Hodges University Health Network
Demosthenes Bouros
Demosthenes Bouros National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Lars S. Rasmussen
Lars S. Rasmussen University of Copenhagen
Larry D. Gruppen
Larry D. Gruppen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Louis N. Pangaro
Louis N. Pangaro Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
David B. Swanson
David B. Swanson National Board of Medical Examiners
Augusto A. Litonjua
Augusto A. Litonjua University of Rochester Medical Center
Ryan Brydges
Ryan Brydges University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Social Sciences and Humanities offers a diverse array of online degree options for students seeking flexibility and advancement in their careers. Many learners are attracted to masters programs in psychology, which can prepare graduates for roles in counseling, research, or organizational development. These programs are ideal for those passionate about understanding human behavior and helping others.

For educators and administrators, edd degrees can offer a fast-track to leadership positions in academic and institutional settings. Similarly, students eager to earn qualifications quickly can explore a range of online master's programs, which allow professionals to efficiently upskill without disrupting their current work or family commitments.

Additionally, undergraduates looking to enter the workforce sooner may consider the benefits of online accelerated programs, providing a faster route to a bachelor’s degree. With so many flexible options available, online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities not only open varied career pathways but also make higher education more accessible for a wide range of students.

Best Scientists Citing Charlotte Ringsted

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles