World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
44982
World Ranking
7873
National Ranking
110

Christoph F. Dietrich publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christoph F. Dietrich sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 863 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Christoph F. Dietrich D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christoph F. Dietrich sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christoph F. Dietrich is affiliated with the Hirslanden Private Hospital Group in Switzerland, contributing extensively to medical research, particularly in ultrasound and hepatology. Their work spans both clinical applications and the integration of advanced imaging techniques.

The scientist's primary fields of study include:

  • Medicine

Within this broad area, their subfields of expertise cover:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Hepatology
  • Epidemiology

Christoph F. Dietrich's research topics are diverse, focusing on:

  • Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Their notable publications include:

  • Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS, 2020, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
  • Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver - Update 2020 - WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS, 2020, Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound
  • Ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics in the assessment of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer, 2021, European Journal of Cancer
  • Quantification of Liver Fat Content with Ultrasound: A WFUMB Position Paper, 2021, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
  • Nomogram Based on Shear-Wave Elastography Radiomics Can Improve Preoperative Cervical Lymph Node Staging for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, 2020, Thyroid

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Christoph F. Dietrich include:

  • Christian Jenssen
  • Yi Dong
  • Xin-Wu Cui
  • Kathleen Möller
  • Christian Görg

Key venues where their research has been published are:

  • Medical Ultrasonography
  • Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
  • Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound
  • Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
  • Diagnostics

Best Publications

  • EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography. Part 1: Basic Principles and Technology

    J Bamber;D Cosgrove;C. F Dietrich;J Fromageau

  • The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): Update 2011 on non-hepatic applications

    F Piscaglia;C Nolsøe;C F Dietrich;D O Cosgrove

  • Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012: A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS.

    Michel Claudon;Christoph F. Dietrich;Byung Ihn Choi;David O. Cosgrove

  • Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - Update 2012

    M. Claudon;C. F. Dietrich;B. I. Choi;D. O. Cosgrove

  • EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography.Part 2: Clinical Applications

    D Cosgrove;F Piscaglia;J Bamber;J Bojunga

  • Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - Update 2008

    M. Claudon;D. Cosgrove;T. Albrecht;L. Bolondi

  • WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology.

    Tsuyoshi Shiina;Kathryn R. Nightingale;Mark L. Palmeri;Timothy J. Hall

  • EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Liver Ultrasound Elastography, Update 2017 (Long Version)

    Christoph F Dietrich;Jeffrey Bamber;Annalisa Berzigotti;Simona Bota

  • The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version)

    Paul S. Sidhu;Vito Cantisani;Christoph F. Dietrich;Odd Helge Gilja

  • Liver Fibrosis in Viral Hepatitis: Noninvasive Assessment with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging versus Transient Elastography

    Mireen Friedrich-Rust;Katrin Wunder;Susanne Kriener;Fariba Sotoudeh

  • WFUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography: Part 2: Breast

    Richard G. Barr;Kazutaka Nakashima;Dominique Amy;David Cosgrove

  • Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS.

    Christoph F Dietrich;Christian Pállson Nolsøe;Richard G Barr;Annalisa Berzigotti

  • Liver Ultrasound Elastography: An Update to the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guidelines and Recommendations.

    Giovanna Ferraioli;Vincent Wai Sun Wong;Laurent Castera;Annalisa Berzigotti

  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions--diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice (DEGUM multicenter trial).

    D. Strobel;K. Seitz;W. Blank;A. Schuler

  • An EFSUMB introduction into Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion.

    C. F. Dietrich;M. A. Averkiou;J.-M. Correas;N. Lassau

  • Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: A multicenter study

    Marc Giovannini;Thomas Botelberge;Erwan Bories;Christian Pesenti

  • How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS).

    Christoph F. Dietrich;Michalakis Averkiou;Michael Bachmann Nielsen;Richard G. Barr

  • Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer

    Michael Hocke;Ewald Schulze;Peter Gottschalk;Theodor Topalidis

  • Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction from Primary Breast Cancer US Images Using Deep Learning

    Li-Qiang Zhou;Xing-Long Wu;Shu-Yan Huang;Ge-Ge Wu

  • Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

    An Tang;Mustafa R. Bashir;Michael T. Corwin;Irene Cruite

Frequent Co-Authors

Fabio Piscaglia
Fabio Piscaglia University of Bologna
Stefan Zeuzem
Stefan Zeuzem Goethe University Frankfurt
Claude B. Sirlin
Claude B. Sirlin University of California, San Diego
Masatoshi Kudo
Masatoshi Kudo Kindai University
Christoph Sarrazin
Christoph Sarrazin Goethe University Frankfurt
Annalisa Berzigotti
Annalisa Berzigotti University of Bern
Byung Ihn Choi
Byung Ihn Choi Seoul National University
Jeffrey C. Bamber
Jeffrey C. Bamber Institute of Cancer Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Medicine in the USA, there are many related online degrees that can help expand your career opportunities in healthcare. For students aiming to become advanced practice nurses, enrolling in a fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program can quickly lead to meaningful roles in mental health care. These programs are designed for those who want to make a difference in psychiatry and patient wellness.

Business-minded students might consider earning a health care administration degree online. This pathway prepares graduates for leadership, management, and policy roles within healthcare systems. For those seeking a graduate credential on a budget, exploring the cheapest online mha programs can be a practical choice.

Nurses interested in top-level clinical practice can pursue doctoral qualifications through some of the cheapest dnp programs online. These degrees are valuable for those aiming to impact healthcare at the highest levels while keeping educational costs manageable.

Best Scientists Citing Christoph F. Dietrich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles