World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 40 5331 4944 316 303 316 7551

Adam Dubrowski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adam Dubrowski between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adam Dubrowski published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 15.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2022. 31 of the 408 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2022. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 8 publications
2000 2025

408 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adam Dubrowski: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 0
2004 3
2005 9
2006 6
2007 24
2008 15
2009 12
2010 20
2011 21
2012 17
2013 19
2014 20
2015 24
2016 17
2017 20
2018 16
2019 11
2020 27
2021 27
2022 35
2023 28
2024 23
2025 8
Total 408
Download as CSV

Adam Dubrowski publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Dubrowski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 314–323 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 316 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101 316
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Adam Dubrowski D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Dubrowski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297 40
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Adam Dubrowski is affiliated with the University of Ontario Institute of Technology in Canada. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on subfields such as Physiology, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, and Emergency Medicine.

They have contributed extensively to topics related to Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare, Surgical Simulation and Training, and Innovations in Medical Education. Additional research interests include Anatomy and Medical Technology, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, and Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout.

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Bill Kapralos
  • Andrei Torres
  • Julia Micallef
  • Érica Patocskai
  • Krystina M Clarke

Adam Dubrowski's publications appear repeatedly in journals such as Cureus, JMIR Research Protocols, Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, BMC Medical Education, and the Canadian Journal of Surgery.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by them include:

  • Repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic on the well-being and training of medical clerks: a pan-Canadian survey (2020) - BMC Medical Education
  • Rural family physician perspectives on communication with urban specialists: a qualitative study (2021) - BMJ Open
  • Using Simulation-Based Methods to Support Demonstration of Competencies Required by Micro-Credential Courses (2021) - Cureus
  • Development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model (2021) - Canadian Journal of Surgery
  • A Model for an Online Learning Management System for Simulation-Based Acquisition of Psychomotor Skills in Health Professions Education (2021) - Cureus

Best Publications

  • Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect?: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Carol-Anne E. Moulton;Adam Dubrowski;Helen MacRae;Brent Graham

  • Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: A randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback

    George J. Xeroulis;Jason Park;Carol-Anne Moulton;Richard K. Reznick

  • Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills

    Mark C. Porte;George Xeroulis;Richard K. Reznick;Adam Dubrowski

  • Coordinating progressive levels of simulation fidelity to maximize educational benefit.

    Ryan Brydges;Heather Carnahan;Don Rose;Louise Rose

  • Laboratory-based vascular anastomosis training: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of bench model fidelity and level of training on skill acquisition.

    Ravi S. Sidhu;Jason Park;Ryan Brydges;Helen M. MacRae

  • A new concept of unsupervised learning: directed self-guided learning in the health professions.

    Ryan Brydges;Adam Dubrowski;Glenn Regehr

  • Measuring cognitive load: performance, mental effort and simulation task complexity.

    Faizal A Haji;Faizal A Haji;David Rojas;Ruth Childs;Sandrine de Ribaupierre

  • Surgical skill acquisition with self-directed practice using computer-based video training

    Nathan Jowett;Vicki LeBlanc;George Xeroulis;Helen MacRae

  • How effective is self‐guided learning of clinical technical skills? It’s all about process

    Ryan Brydges;Heather Carnahan;Oleg Safir;Adam Dubrowski

  • Using a virtual reality temporal bone simulator to assess otolaryngology trainees.

    Molly Zirkle;David W. Roberson;Rudolf Leuwer;Adam Dubrowski

  • Comparison of expert instruction and computer-based video training in teaching fundamental surgical skills to medical students

    Markku Nousiainen;Ryan Brydges;David Backstein;Adam Dubrowski

  • Application of motor learning principles to complex surgical tasks: searching for the optimal practice schedule.

    Ryan Brydges;Heather Carnahan;David Backstein;Adam Dubrowski

  • Supporting Evidence-Based Practice for Nurses through Information Technologies

    Diane M. Doran;R. Brian Haynes;André Kushniruk;Sharon Straus

  • Thrive or overload? The effect of task complexity on novices’ simulation‐based learning

    Faizal A Haji;Faizal A Haji;Jeffrey J H Cheung;Nicole Woods;Glenn Regehr

  • Healthcare Training Enhancement Through Virtual Reality and Serious Games

    Sandrine de Ribaupierre;Bill Kapralos;Faizal Haji;Faizal Haji;Eleni Stroulia

  • The application of the challenge point framework in medical education.

    Mark Guadagnoli;Marie-Paule Morin;Marie-Paule Morin;Adam Dubrowski

  • Randomised, controlled study investigating the optimal instructor: student ratios for teaching suturing skills

    Adam Dubrowski;Helen MacRae

  • Comparing self-guided learning and educator-guided learning formats for simulation-based clinical training

    Ryan Brydges;Heather Carnahan;Don Rose;Adam Dubrowski

  • What happens to the brain in weightlessness? A first approach by EEG tomography.

    Stefan Schneider;Vera Brümmer;Heather Carnahan;Adam Dubrowski

  • The creation of an objective assessment tool for ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia using the Delphi method.

    Jeffrey J.H. Cheung;Ewen W. Chen;Rosemin Darani;Colin J.L. McCartney

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryan Brydges
Ryan Brydges University of Toronto
Glenn Regehr
Glenn Regehr University of British Columbia
Brian Hodges
Brian Hodges University Health Network
Vicki R. LeBlanc
Vicki R. LeBlanc University of Ottawa
Andre Kushniruk
Andre Kushniruk University of Victoria
Michael Jenkin
Michael Jenkin York University
Sharon E. Straus
Sharon E. Straus University of Toronto
James M. Drake
James M. Drake University of Toronto
Carole A. Estabrooks
Carole A. Estabrooks University of Alberta
Cristina Conati
Cristina Conati University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your studies in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up diverse online degree options, including psychology, social work, clinical therapy, and counseling. Many students are now prioritizing both affordability and flexibility when choosing a program.

Prospective psychology students can explore affordable online psychology degrees that not only reduce financial strain but also provide rigorous academic training. If you are interested in becoming a licensed therapist or counselor, several accelerated marriage and family therapy programs allow you to earn your credentials more quickly.

Those considering a career in clinical social work can take advantage of 1 year msw programs online no bsw, providing a fast track to a Master of Social Work even without a Bachelor of Social Work background. Additionally, aspiring psychologists interested in practicing at the highest level might consider fully online psyd online programs.

As online education evolves, these flexible programs make it easier than ever to start a rewarding career in social sciences and humanities—all from the comfort of home.

Best Scientists Citing Adam Dubrowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles