World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
28890
World Ranking
19286
National Ranking
9606

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
73
Citations
28674
World Ranking
621
National Ranking
298

William C. McGaghie publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William C. McGaghie sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 295 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

William C. McGaghie D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William C. McGaghie sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

William C. McGaghie is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and has a focus on medical education and healthcare simulation. Their research encompasses a broad range of topics within medicine, with a significant emphasis on innovations in medical education and simulation-based education in healthcare.

McGaghie's main field of study is Medicine, supported by numerous publications in related subfields such as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Family Practice, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Emergency Medical Services.

The key topics covered in McGaghie's work include:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Radiology practices and education
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

They have published extensively in journals such as Academic Medicine, Pediatric Cardiology, the Journal of Graduate Medical Education, Medical Teacher, and Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. The frequency of their publications reflects ongoing engagement with medical education research, especially simulation learning.

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Development of the Uncertainty Communication Checklist: A Patient-Centered Approach to Patient Discharge From the Emergency Department" (2020), Academic Medicine
  • "Promoting Readiness for Residency: Embedding Simulation-Based Mastery Learning for Breaking Bad News Into the Medicine Subinternship" (2020), Academic Medicine
  • "Are USMLE Scores Valid Measures for Chief Resident Selection?" (2020), Journal of Graduate Medical Education
  • "Communicating Diagnostic Uncertainty at Emergency Department Discharge: A Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Randomized Trial" (2022), Academic Medicine
  • "Simulation-based mastery learning compared to standard education for discussing diagnostic uncertainty with patients in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial" (2020), BMC Medical Education

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, among them Jeffrey H. Barsuk, Diane B. Wayne, David H. Salzman, Elaine Cohen, and Kristin L. Rising. These collaborations indicate a strong network in medical education and simulation research.

In addition to journal articles, William C. McGaghie has contributed to book literature, including a publication with Springer International Publishing titled "Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Mastery Learning in Health Professions Education" (2020), which further underscores their focus on mastery learning techniques in healthcare simulation.

Best Publications

  • Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review

    S. Barry Issenberg;William C. McGAGHIE;Emil R. Petrusa;David Lee Gordon

  • A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009

    William Craig McGaghie;S. Barry Issenberg;Emil R. Petrusa;Ross J. Scalese

  • Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence

    William C. McGaghie;S. Barry Issenberg;Elaine R. Cohen;Jeffrey H. Barsuk

  • Simulation Technology for Health Care Professional Skills Training and Assessment

    S. Barry Issenberg;William C. McGaghie;Ian R. Hart;Joan W. Mayer

  • Simulation-Based Education Improves Quality of Care During Cardiac Arrest Team Responses at an Academic Teaching Hospital: A Case-Control Study

    Diane B. Wayne;Aashish Didwania;Joe Feinglass;Monica J. Fudala

  • What is feedback in clinical education

    J M Monica Van De Ridder;Karel M Stokking;William C McGaghie;Olle Th J Ten Cate

  • Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit.

    Jeffrey H. Barsuk;William C. McGaghie;Elaine R. Cohen;Kevin J. O’Leary

  • A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes.

    William C McGaghie;Saul B Issenberg;Jeffrey H Barsuk;Diane B Wayne

  • Use of Simulation-Based Education to Reduce Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections

    Jeffrey H. Barsuk;Elaine R. Cohen;Joe Feinglass;William C. McGaghie

  • Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings.

    Reed G. Williams;Debra A. Klamen;William C. McGaghie

  • Mastery Learning of Advanced Cardiac Life Support Skills by Internal Medicine Residents Using Simulation Technology and Deliberate Practice

    Diane B. Wayne;John Butter;Viva J. Siddall;Monica J. Fudala

  • Use of simulation-based mastery learning to improve the quality of central venous catheter placement in a medical intensive care unit.

    Jeffrey H. Barsuk;William C. McGaghie;Elaine R. Cohen;Jayshankar S. Balachandran

  • Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education

    William C McGaghie;S Barry Issenberg;Emil R Petrusa;Ross J Scalese

  • Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit.

    Elaine R. Cohen;Joe Feinglass;Jeffrey H. Barsuk;Cynthia Barnard

  • Simulation-based training of internal medicine residents in advanced cardiac life support protocols: A randomized trial

    Diane B Wayne;John Butter;Viva J Siddall;Monica J Fudala

  • Evaluating the Impact of Simulation on Translational Patient Outcomes

    William C. McGaghie;Timothy J. Draycott;William F. Dunn;Connie M. Lopez

  • Mastery learning of thoracentesis skills by internal medicine residents using simulation technology and deliberate practice.

    Diane B. Wayne;Jeffrey H. Barsuk;Kevin J. O'Leary;Monica J. Fudala

  • Mastery learning: it is time for medical education to join the 21st century.

    William C. McGaghie

  • Simulation-based education with mastery learning improves residents' lumbar puncture skills

    Jeffrey H. Barsuk;Elaine R. Cohen;Timothy Caprio;William C. McGaghie

  • Lessons for Continuing Medical Education From Simulation Research in Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education: Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines

    William C. McGaghie;Viva J. Siddall;Paul E. Mazmanian;Janet Myers

  • Simulations in Assessment

    William C. Mcgaghie;S. Barry Issenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert F. Kushner
Robert F. Kushner Northwestern University
Gordon S. Mitchell
Gordon S. Mitchell University of Florida
Georges Bordage
Georges Bordage University of Illinois at Chicago
Kenzie A. Cameron
Kenzie A. Cameron Northwestern University
Allen R. Nissenson
Allen R. Nissenson University of California, Los Angeles
Judy A. Shea
Judy A. Shea University of Pennsylvania
Ronald M. Harden
Ronald M. Harden University of Dundee
Zoran Martinovich
Zoran Martinovich Northwestern University
Brenda M. DeVellis
Brenda M. DeVellis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Linda Van Horn
Linda Van Horn Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a wide array of flexible online degree options. Many students seek cacrep accredited programs online to pursue careers in counseling, ensuring their education meets rigorous professional standards.

For those interested in working with families and couples, there are cheapest online mft programs that provide a budget-friendly path toward licensure as a Marriage and Family Therapist.

Psychology remains one of the most popular fields, and options like a cheapest psychology degree online let you build a strong foundation for careers in mental health, education, research, and more.

If social work is your calling, finding msw programs that are accessible and flexible can help you qualify for roles in community organizations, healthcare, and counseling services.

Exploring these online pathways provides both affordability and the convenience needed to balance studies with your personal commitments, making career advancement more achievable.

Best Scientists Citing William C. McGaghie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles