World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6114 5683 3326 3017 115 10501

Brenda M. DeVellis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brenda M. DeVellis between 1976 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brenda M. DeVellis published across 43 years, from 1976 to 2018, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2007. 4 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2007. 1976: 4 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 4 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 9 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications
1976 2018

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brenda M. DeVellis: publications per year, 1976 to 2018
Year Publications
1976 4
1977 0
1978 4
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 2
1984 3
1985 1
1986 4
1987 3
1988 3
1989 2
1990 5
1991 1
1992 4
1993 4
1994 2
1995 6
1996 4
1997 5
1998 4
1999 1
2000 9
2001 3
2002 9
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 6
2007 10
2008 8
2009 2
2010 8
2011 5
2012 3
2013 1
2014 2
2015 2
2016 0
2017 2
2018 2
Total 143
Download as CSV

Brenda M. DeVellis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda M. DeVellis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 115
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Brenda M. DeVellis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda M. DeVellis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Brenda M. DeVellis is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields within medicine, including experimental and cognitive psychology, family practice, geriatrics and gerontology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and genetics.

DeVellis has contributed to multiple research topics such as:

  • Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Vasculitis and related conditions
  • Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
  • Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis

Their scholarly output includes papers published mainly through UNC Libraries. Notable recent papers include:

  • Osteoarthritis and Sleep: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Brief fear of movement scale for osteoarthritis, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Racial Differences in Sleep Medication Use: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Results of a Randomized Trial Testing Messages Tailored to Participant-Selected Topics among Female College Students: Physical Activity Outcomes, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Use and Perceived Credibility of Medication Information Sources for Patients with a Rare Illness: Differences by Gender, 2020, UNC Libraries

Throughout their career, DeVellis has collaborated frequently with several coauthors including Joanne M. Jordan, Marci K. Campbell, Jordan B. Renner, Robert F. DeVellis, and Susan L. Hogan.

Their research often intersects with interdisciplinary topics, reflecting a breadth of studies in both clinical and psychological aspects of medicine, addressing conditions related to sleep, medication, and inflammatory diseases.

Best Publications

  • The Role of Self-Efficacy in Achieving Health Behavior Change

    Victor J. Strecher;Brenda McEvoy DeVellis;Marshall H. Becker;Irwin M. Rosenstock

  • Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings.

    Marci Kramish Campbell;Brenda M. DeVellis;Victor J. Strecher;Alice S. Ammerman

  • Social support and physical health.

    Barbara S. Wallston;Sheryle W. Alagna;Brenda M. DeVellis;Robert F. DeVellis

  • Goal Setting as a Strategy for Health Behavior Change

    Victor J. Strecher;Gerard H. Seijts;Gerjo J. Kok;Gary P. Latham

  • Effects of a tailored health promotion program for female blue-collar workers: health works for women.

    Marci Kramish Campbell;Irene Tessaro;Brenda DeVellis;Salli Benedict

  • Healthy Coping, Negative Emotions, and Diabetes Management A Systematic Review and Appraisal

    Edwin B. Fisher;Carolyn T. Thorpe;Brenda Mc Evoy Devellis;Robert F. Devellis

  • Factors affecting African-American participation in AIDS research.

    Sohini Sengupta;Ronald P. Strauss;Robert DeVellis;Sandra Crouse Quinn

  • Arthritis and perceptions of quality of life: an examination of positive and negative affect in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

    Alex J. Zautra;Mary H. Burleson;Craig A. Smith;Susan J. Blalock

  • A randomized trial of tailoring and motivational interviewing to promote fruit and vegetable consumption for cancer prevention and control.

    Marci Kramish Campbell;Carol Carr;Brenda Devellis;Boyd Switzer

  • Osteoarthritis and sleep: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.

    Kelli D. Allen;Jordan B. Renner;Brenda Devellis;Charles G. Helmick

  • Osteoporosis prevention in premenopausal women: Using a stage model approach to examine the predictors of behavior.

    Susan J. Blalock;Robert F. DeVellis;Karen B. Giorgino;Brenda M. DeVellis

  • Risk perceptions and participation in colorectal cancer screening.

    Susan J. Blalock;Brenda M. DeVellis;Rema A. Afifi;Robert S. Sandler

  • Predicting Participation in Cancer Screening: The Role of Perceived Behavioral Control1

    Brenda McEvoy Devellis;Susan J. Blalock;Robert S. Sandler

  • Disease experience and psychosocial adjustment in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: children's versus mothers' reports.

    Susan T. Ennett;Brenda M. DeVellis;Jo Anne Earp;Deborah Kredich

  • Effects of educational materials concerning osteoporosis on women's knowledge, beliefs, and behavior.

    Susan J. Blalock;Shannon Smith Currey;Robert F. DeVellis;Brenda M. DeVellis

  • Brief fear of movement scale for osteoarthritis

    Rebecca A. Shelby;Tamara J. Somers;Francis J. Keefe;Brenda M. DeVellis

  • Epilepsy and Learned Helplessness

    Robert F. Devillis;Brenda McEvoy Devellis;Barbara Strudler Wallston;Kenneth A. Wallston

  • The effect of conflicting medication information and physician support on medication adherence for chronically ill patients

    Delesha M. Carpenter;Robert F. DeVellis;Edwin B. Fisher;Brenda M. DeVellis

  • Evaluation of arthritis self-management courses led by laypersons and by professionals

    Judith L. Cohen;Suzanne van Houten Sauter;Robert F. Devellis;Brenda Mcevoy DeVellis

  • Community-based treatment of late life depression an expert panel-informed literature review.

    John T. Frederick;Lesley E. Steinman;Thomas Prohaska;William A. Satariano

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan J. Blalock
Susan J. Blalock University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert S. Sandler
Robert S. Sandler University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Megan A. Lewis
Megan A. Lewis RTI International
Kenneth A. Wallston
Kenneth A. Wallston Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Edwin B. Fisher
Edwin B. Fisher University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Francis J. Keefe
Francis J. Keefe Duke University
Elizabeth J. Mutran
Elizabeth J. Mutran University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Leigh F. Callahan
Leigh F. Callahan University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Carol S. Wolf Runyan
Carol S. Wolf Runyan Colorado School of Public Health
Donald H. Baucom
Donald H. Baucom University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways, particularly in the field of counseling. Online programs now allow students to access high-quality education and flexibility, making them an appealing choice for working professionals or those wanting to balance other commitments.

When exploring options, it’s important to compare different programs across the country. For instance, the top counseling degree programs in Texas are renowned for their comprehensive curriculum and clinical training opportunities. Likewise, students interested in the Pacific Northwest can learn from the best college counseling programs in Washington, which are known for their innovative approaches in mental health education.

For those aspiring to work in urban environments, the top counseling degree programs in Washington, D.C. offer unique networking and internship potential. If you’re seeking programs across a broader region, consider the offerings at West counseling degree programs, which span several states and provide diverse training experiences.

By exploring these options, students can tailor their education to fit their career interests, whether that means working as a counselor, therapist, or in clinical research.

Best Scientists Citing Brenda M. DeVellis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles