World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephan ten Brink

Stephan ten Brink

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
21650
World Ranking
6006
National Ranking
280

Stephan ten Brink publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan ten Brink sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 215 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stephan ten Brink D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan ten Brink sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephan ten Brink is affiliated with the University of Stuttgart in Germany and conducts research primarily in the fields of Engineering and Computer Science. Their work extensively covers subfields such as Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, and Aerospace Engineering.

Their research focuses on a range of advanced topics, including:

  • Error Correcting Code Techniques
  • Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
  • Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
  • Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
  • Wireless Signal Modulation Classification
  • Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Speech and Audio Processing

Recent publications highlight ongoing contributions to wireless communication and channel coding, including:

  • "6G: A Welcome Chance to Unify Channel Coding?" (2023), IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine
  • "Trends in Channel Coding for 6G" (2024), Proceedings of the IEEE
  • "Learning Radio Environments by Differentiable Ray Tracing" (2024), IEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking
  • "Angle-Delay Profile-Based and Timestamp-Aided Dissimilarity Metrics for Channel Charting" (2024), IEEE Transactions on Communications
  • "Learning Joint Detection, Equalization and Decoding for Short-Packet Communications" (2022), IEEE Transactions on Communications

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Stephan ten Brink include Marvin Geiselhart, Jannis Clausius, Florian Euchner, Sebastian Dörner, and Sebastian Cammerer. These collaborations reflect a consistent partnership in advancing topics related to channel coding and wireless communication technologies.

Their work is often published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Communications
  • 2022 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)
  • 2022 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communication (SPAWC)
  • IEEE Communications Letters

This publication pattern illustrates a strong emphasis on conferences and journals specializing in communications, signal processing, and machine learning in communication networks.

Best Publications

  • Achieving near-capacity on a multiple-antenna channel

    B.M. Hochwald;S. ten Brink

  • Massive MIMO in the UL/DL of Cellular Networks: How Many Antennas Do We Need?

    J. Hoydis;Stephan ten Brink;M. Debbah

  • Convergence behavior of iteratively decoded parallel concatenated codes

    Unknown

  • Design of low-density parity-check codes for modulation and detection

    S. ten Brink;G. Kramer;A. Ashikhmin

  • 5GNOW: non-orthogonal, asynchronous waveforms for future mobile applications

    Gerhard Wunder;Peter Jung;Martin Kasparick;Thorsten Wild

  • Extrinsic information transfer functions: model and erasure channel properties

    A. Ashikhmin;G. Kramer;S. ten Brink

  • Deep Learning Based Communication Over the Air

    Sebastian Dorner;Sebastian Cammerer;Jakob Hoydis;Stephan ten Brink

  • Universal-filtered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE

    Vida Vakilian;Thorsten Wild;Frank Schaich;Stephan ten Brink

  • Convergence of iterative decoding

    Unknown

  • On deep learning-based channel decoding

    Tobias Gruber;Sebastian Cammerer;Jakob Hoydis;Stephan ten Brink

  • Iterative demapping and decoding for multilevel modulation

    Unknown

  • Massive MIMO: How many antennas do we need?

    Jakob Hoydis;Stephan ten Brink;Merouane Debbah

  • Channel measurements for large antenna arrays

    Jakob Hoydis;Cornelis Hoek;Thorsten Wild;Stephan ten Brink

  • A close-to-capacity dirty paper coding scheme

    Unknown

  • Design of repeat-accumulate codes for iterative detection and decoding

    S. ten Brink;G. Kramer

  • Soft handover system for a multiple sub-carrier communication system and method thereof

    Stephan ten Brink;Richard D. J. van Nee

  • OFDM-Autoencoder for End-to-End Learning of Communications Systems

    Alexander Felix;Sebastian Cammerer;Sebastian Dorner;Jakob Hoydis

  • Making smart use of excess antennas: Massive MIMO, small cells, and TDD

    Jakob Hoydis;Kianoush Hosseini;Stephan ten Brink;Mérouane Debbah

  • Scaling Deep Learning-Based Decoding of Polar Codes via Partitioning

    Sebastian Cammerer;Tobias Gruber;Jakob Hoydis;Stephan ten Brink

  • Silicon complexity for maximum likelihood MIMO detection using spherical decoding

    D. Garrett;L. Davis;S. ten Brink;B. Hochwald

  • Detect and avoid: an ultra-wideband/WiMAX coexistence mechanism [Topics in Radio Communications]

    S.M. Mishra;R.W. Brodersen;S.T. Brink;R. Mahadevappa

  • 5GNOW: Challenging the LTE Design Paradigms of Orthogonality and Synchronicity

    Gerhard Wunder;Martin Kasparick;Stephan ten Brink;Frank Schaich

  • Pilot interference cancellation for a coherent wireless code division multiple access receiver

    Howard C. Huang;Chih-Lin I;Stephan ten Brink;Giovanni Vannucci

  • Massive MIMO and small cells: How to densify heterogeneous networks

    Kianoush Hosseini;Jakob Hoydis;Stephan ten Brink;Merouane Debbah

  • Trainable Communication Systems: Concepts and Prototype

    Sebastian Cammerer;Faycal Ait Aoudia;Sebastian Dorner;Maximilian Stark

  • Belief Propagation List Decoding of Polar Codes

    Ahmed Elkelesh;Moustafa Ebada;Sebastian Cammerer;Stephan ten Brink

  • Method and apparatus for detection and decoding of signals received from a linear propagation channel

    Bertrand Martyn Hochwald;Stephan ten Brink

Frequent Co-Authors

Jakob Hoydis
Jakob Hoydis Nvidia (United States)
Laurent Schmalen
Laurent Schmalen Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Bertrand M. Hochwald
Bertrand M. Hochwald University of Notre Dame
Chih-Lin I
Chih-Lin I China Mobile (China)
Merouane Debbah
Merouane Debbah Khalifa University
Fred Buchali
Fred Buchali Nokia (United States)
Gerhard Kramer
Gerhard Kramer Technical University of Munich
Howard Huang
Howard Huang Nokia (United States)
Li Ping
Li Ping City University of Hong Kong
Mathieu Chagnon
Mathieu Chagnon McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career options. Learners interested in the fundamentals of the physical world and gaining a strong analytical base might also consider a best online physics degree. This degree can strengthen problem-solving skills valuable in tech fields.

For those who want to focus on Big Data, pursuing data science degrees is a smart move. Data science blends computing, statistics, and business insights—making graduates highly sought after in industries worldwide.

Technically-minded students seeking specialized knowledge may pursue an online master’s in electrical engineering degree. This can lead to roles in software, hardware, robotics, and telecommunications.

If you’re seeking faster, high-value pathways, there are also 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These certifications are ideal for upskilling quickly and entering tech-support, coding, or data analysis jobs in a matter of months.

Best Scientists Citing Stephan ten Brink

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles