World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
54
Citations
28287
World Ranking
1091
National Ranking
120

Paul Kind publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Kind sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 179 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Paul Kind D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Kind sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Kind is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions span multiple fields with a focus on economics, econometrics, finance, and health professions. The subfields associated with their work include economics and econometrics, general health professions, health, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and health, toxicology and mutagenesis.

The main topics addressed in their research cover health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life, as well as health psychology and well-being, health disparities and outcomes, prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, global health care issues, health policy implementation science, and pharmaceutical practices and patient outcomes.

Paul Kind has published extensively in several academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets for their work include:

  • Value in Health
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Value in Health Regional Issues
  • The European Journal of Health Economics
  • Psycho-Oncology

Recent papers cover a range of topics related to health quality of life assessment and patient outcomes. Some of these publications are:

  • "Similarities and Differences in Health-Related Quality-of-Life Concepts Between the East and the West: A Qualitative Analysis of the Content of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measures," 2021, Value in Health Regional Issues
  • "Measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in recording self-reported health status in older patients with substantial multimorbidity and polypharmacy," 2020, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • "Decision regret in men living with and beyond nonmetastatic prostate cancer in the United Kingdom: A population-based patient-reported outcome study," 2020, Psycho-Oncology
  • "Transforming discrete choice experiment latent scale values for EQ-5D-3L using the visual analogue scale," 2020, The European Journal of Health Economics
  • "Exploring subjective constructions of health in China: a Q-methodological investigation," 2020, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Paul Kind has collaborated frequently with multiple coauthors including:

  • David Meads
  • Zhuxin Mao
  • Penny Wright
  • Edward J. D. Webb
  • Shenaz Ahmed

Best Publications

  • Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

    M Herdman;Claire Gudex;A Lloyd;MF Janssen

  • Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets

    Ben Van Hout;M. F. Janssen;You-Shan Feng;Thomas Kohlmann

  • Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey.

    Paul Kind;Paul Dolan;Claire Gudex;Alan Williams

  • Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D).

    N P Hurst;P Kind;D Ruta;M Hunter

  • Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D

    Nora Wille;Xavier Badia;Gouke J. Bonsel;Kristina Burström

  • Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire.

    J. Brazier;N. Jones;P. Kind

  • The time trade-off method: results from a general population study.

    Paul Dolan;Claire Gudex;Paul Kind;Alan Williams

  • A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey

    Paul Dolan;Claire Gudex;Paul Kind;Alan Williams

  • A single European currency for EQ-5D health states. Results from a six-country study.

    Wolfgang Greiner;Tom Weijnen;Martin Nieuwenhuizen;Siem Oppe

  • South Korean Time Trade‐Off Values for EQ‐5D Health States: Modeling with Observed Values for 101 Health States

    Yeon-Kyeng Lee;Hae-Sung Nam;Ling-Hsiang Chuang;Keon-Yeop Kim

  • A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus?

    Rachel Rosser;Paul Kind

  • Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: Results from a multinational study

    Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer;Nora Wille;Xavier Badia;Gouke Bonsel

  • UK population norms for EQ-5D

    Paul Kind;Geoffrey Hardman;Susan Macran

  • US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study.

    Dennis G. Fryback;Nancy Cross Dunham;Mari Palta;Janel Hanmer

  • Valuing health states: a comparison of methods.

    Paul Dolan;Claire Gudex;Paul Kind;Alan Williams

  • A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states.

    Xavier Badia;Montserrat Roset;Michael Herdman;Paul Kind

  • Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different?

    Jeffrey A. Johnson;Nan Luo;James W. Shaw;Paul Kind

  • From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking

    Lalla Aïda Guindo;Monika Wagner;Rob Baltussen;Donna Rindress

  • Health state valuations from the general public using the visual analogue scale

    Claire Gudex;Paul Dolan;Paul Kind;Alan Williams

  • Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    N P Hurst;D A Ruta;P Kind

  • The costs of depression

    P. Kind;Jon Sorensen

  • Measuring health status in the community: a comparison of methods.

    Paul Kind;Claire M Gudex

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Dolan
Paul Dolan London School of Economics and Political Science
Alan Williams
Alan Williams University of York
Peter Selby
Peter Selby University of Leeds
Michael Herdman
Michael Herdman University of Barcelona
Wolfgang Greiner
Wolfgang Greiner Bielefeld University
Gouke J. Bonsel
Gouke J. Bonsel Erasmus University Rotterdam
James W.F. Catto
James W.F. Catto University of Sheffield
Federico Augustovski
Federico Augustovski National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Linda Clare
Linda Clare University of Exeter
Carol Brayne
Carol Brayne University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities are expanding opportunities for students seeking flexibility and accessibility. Popular options include psychology, social work, counseling, and marriage and family therapy programs. Choosing the right program means considering factors such as accreditation, tuition costs, admission requirements, and program length.

If you’re interested in mental health, a psychology online degree offers a foundational step toward careers in research, counseling, or clinical settings. Those looking to enter social work should explore the easiest msw online program options, which can provide faster entry into the field and accessible admissions.

Graduate-level programs, such as a psyd program for aspiring clinical psychologists, emphasize practical skills and licensure preparation. For those interested in family therapy, the mft online programs can pave the way for a specialized counseling career in a streamlined format.

With the growing demand for professionals in these fields, online degrees provide diverse career pathways—from private practice to non-profits and schools—making them a strong choice for future social science and humanities professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Kind

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles