World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wolfgang Greiner

Wolfgang Greiner

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
11111
World Ranking
4059
National Ranking
107

Wolfgang Greiner publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Greiner sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 349 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Wolfgang Greiner D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Greiner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D

    Nora Wille;Xavier Badia;Gouke J. Bonsel;Kristina Burström

  • Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation-A Scoping Review

    Florian Fischer;Kerstin Lange;Kristina Klose;Wolfgang Greiner

  • A single European currency for EQ-5D health states. Results from a six-country study.

    Wolfgang Greiner;Tom Weijnen;Martin Nieuwenhuizen;Siem Oppe

  • Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: Results from a multinational study

    Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer;Nora Wille;Xavier Badia;Gouke Bonsel

  • German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L

    Kristina Ludwig;Kristina Ludwig;J.-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg;Wolfgang Greiner

  • Health Technology Assessment (HTA)

    Wolfgang Greiner

  • Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population

    Wolfgang Greiner;C. Claes;Jan van Busschbach;Johann-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg

  • Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.

    Matthew Kennedy-Martin;Bernhard Slaap;Michael Herdman;Mandy van Reenen

  • Ermittlung standardisierter Bewertungssätze aus gesellschaftlicher Perspektive für die gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation

    J.-O. Bock;C. Brettschneider;H. Seidl;D. Bowles

  • Methods for measuring financial toxicity after cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review and its implications.

    J. Witte;K. Mehlis;B. Surmann;R. Lingnau

  • Cost effectiveness of peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin versus interferon α-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C

    U. Siebert;U. Siebert;G. Sroczynski;S. Rossol;J. Wasem

  • Effects of an Internet intervention (Deprexis) on severe depression symptoms: Randomized controlled trial

    Björn Meyer;Julia Bierbrodt;Johanna Schröder;Thomas Berger

  • Die deutsche Version des EuroQol-Fragebogens

    J.-Matthias Graf;Christa Claes;Wolfgang Greiner;Andrea Uber

  • Effects of a Psychological Internet Intervention in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Depressive Symptoms: Results of the EVIDENT Study, a Randomized Controlled Trial

    JP Klein;T Berger;J Schröder;C Späth

  • German recommendations on health economic evaluation: third and updated version of the Hanover Consensus.

    J.-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg;Wolfgang Greiner;Fred Jost;Norbert Klusen

  • Deutsche Empfehlungen zur gesundheitsökonomischen Evaluation - dritte und aktualisierte Fassung des Hannoveraner Konsens

    J.-M. Graf von der Schulenburg;W. Greiner;F. Jost;N. Klusen

  • The EQ Health and Wellbeing: Overview of the Development of a Measure of Health and Wellbeing and Key Results.

    Unknown

  • EQ-5D-Y as a Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Children and Adolescents: The Instrument's Characteristics, Development, Current Use, and Challenges of Developing Its Value Set.

    Simone Kreimeier;Wolfgang Greiner

  • FIMA – Fragebogen zur Erhebung von Gesundheitsleistungen im Alter: Entwicklung und Pilotstudie

    H. Seidl;D. Bowles;J.-O. Bock;C. Brettschneider

  • Methods for Health Economic Evaluation of Vaccines and Immunization Decision Frameworks: A Consensus Framework from a European Vaccine Economics Community

    Bernhard Ultsch;Oliver Damm;Phillippe Beutels;Joke Bilcke

  • German recommendations on health economic evaluation - Third and updated version of the Hanover Consensus

    J.-M Graf von der Schulenburg;W Greiner;F Jost;N Klusen

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan N. Willich
Stefan N. Willich Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ole Wichmann
Ole Wichmann Robert Koch Institute
Uwe Siebert
Uwe Siebert UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology
Steffen Moritz
Steffen Moritz University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Matthias Rose
Matthias Rose Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Fritz Hohagen
Fritz Hohagen University of Lübeck
Paul Kind
Paul Kind University of Leeds
Johanna Schröder
Johanna Schröder Medical School Hamburg
Björn Meyer
Björn Meyer City, University of London
Wolfgang Lutz
Wolfgang Lutz University of Trier

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a variety of flexible pathways for students. Many schools now offer psychology degrees online, which are both affordable and accessible, making it easier to pursue careers in counseling, social work, and research.

If you’re interested in helping individuals, families, and communities, consider looking into msw online programs. These programs prepare students for leadership roles in social services and often have flexible admission requirements.

For those aiming toward advanced clinical practice or academia, a doctoral program may be a right fit. Accredited psyd programs focus on clinical psychology and open the door to specialized positions in therapy or assessment.

Quickly start a career in marriage and family therapy by discovering mft accredited programs. These shorter online options meet licensure requirements and help graduates make a positive impact in their communities sooner.

Online degrees in these fields equip graduates for dynamic roles in counseling, therapy, academia, and research, while offering the flexibility to balance studies with other life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfgang Greiner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles