World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Economics and Finance
Canada
2026
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Canada
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
77
Citations
40243
World Ranking
316
National Ranking
3

David Feeny publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Feeny sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 249 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

David Feeny D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Feeny sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Economics and Finance in Canada Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Canada Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Canada Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Canada Leader Award

Overview

David Feeny is an academic affiliated with McMaster University in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with specific focus on related subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Speech and Hearing, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their work prominently addresses topics including Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life; Delphi Technique in Research; Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes; Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation; Noise Effects and Management; Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics; and Healthcare Policy and Management.

Frequent publication venues for Feeny include Value in Health, where they have published five papers, PLoS ONE with three publications, as well as JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, and Medical Decision Making.

Their recent papers showcase a concentration on quality of life, healthcare use, and physician care patterns. Notable publications include:

  • Health-Related Quality of Life Changes Associated With Hearing Loss, 2020, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
  • Associations between continuity of primary and specialty physician care and use of hospital-based care among community-dwelling older adults with complex care needs, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Generic Health-Related Quality of Life Utility Measure for Preschool Children (Health Utilities Preschool): Design, Development, and Properties, 2022, Value in Health
  • Physician Home Visit Patterns and Hospital Use Among Older Adults with Functional Impairments, 2020, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • A Scoring Algorithm for Deriving Utility Values from the Neuro-QoL for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis, 2020, Medical Decision Making

Feeny has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, particularly with Shelagh M. Szabo and Katherine Gooch, each appearing six times as coauthors. Other regular collaborators include Susan T. Iannaccone, Peter R. Dixon, and George Tomlinson.

Best Publications

  • Measuring health-related quality of life.

    Gordon H. Guyatt;David H. Feeny;Donald L. Patrick

  • Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine

    Gillian D. Sanders;Peter J. Neumann;Anirban Basu;Dan W. Brock

  • The tragedy of the commons: twenty-two years later.

    David Feeny;I Fikret Berkes;Bonnie J. McCay;James M. Acheson

  • How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations

    A Laupacis;D Feeny;A S Detsky;P X Tugwell

  • The Health Utilities Index (HUI®): concepts, measurement properties and applications

    John Horsman;William Furlong;David H. Feeny;George Torrance

  • Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.

    David Feeny;William Furlong;George W Torrance;Charles H Goldsmith

  • Core IS Capabilities for Exploiting Information Technology

    D. F. Feeny;Leslie P. Willcocks

  • Measuring quality of life in children with asthma.

    E. F. Juniper;G. H. Guyatt;D. H. Feeny;D. H. Feeny;P. J. Ferrie

  • Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index.

    David Feeny;William Furlong;Michael Boyle;George W. Torrance

  • Multiattribute Utility Function for a Comprehensive Health Status Classification System Health Utilities Index Mark 2

    George W. Torrance;David H. Feeny;William J. Furlong;Ronald D. Barr

  • The benefits of the commons

    F. Berkes;D. Feeny;B. J. McCay;J. M. Acheson

  • Utilities and quality-adjusted life years.

    George W. Torrance;David Feeny

  • The Value of Selective IT Sourcing

    Mary C. Lacity;L. P. Willcocks;David Feeny

  • Making the commons work: theory, practice, and policy

    Daniel W. Bromley;David Feeny

  • ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research

    Bryce B. Reeve;Kathleen W. Wyrwich;Albert W. Wu;Galina Velikova

  • The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies.

    William J Furlong;David H Feeny;George W Torrance;Ronald D Barr

  • Measuring quality of life in the parents of children with asthma

    E. F. Juniper;G. H. Guyatt;D. H. Feeny;D. H. Feeny;P. J. Ferrie

  • The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life.

    Andreas Laupacis;Robert Bourne;Cecil Rorabeck;David Feeny

  • Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.

    George W. Torrance;William Furlong;David Feeny;Michael Boyle

  • FILE COPY t , Land Tenure and Property Rights : Theory and Implications for Development Policy

    Unknown

  • Health Care Technology: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Public Policy@@@Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes

    Brian Ferguson;David Feeny;Gordon Guyatt;Peter Tugwell

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. Kaplan
Mark S. Kaplan University of California, Los Angeles
Chris M. Blanchard
Chris M. Blanchard Dalhousie University
Nancy A. Ross
Nancy A. Ross Queen's University
Michael H. Boyle
Michael H. Boyle McMaster University
David L. Streiner
David L. Streiner University of Toronto
Paul A. Pilkonis
Paul A. Pilkonis University of Pittsburgh
Baruch Fischhoff
Baruch Fischhoff Carnegie Mellon University
Michael Drummond
Michael Drummond University of York
Robert G. Evans
Robert G. Evans University of British Columbia
Amiram Gafni
Amiram Gafni McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The evolving landscape of online education offers flexible and accessible pathways to careers in Social Sciences and Humanities. Students can choose from various degree options that cater to different timelines, career goals, and personal circumstances.

For those passionate about mental health, an online masters in clinical psychology is a cost-effective route to careers in counseling, therapy, and research fields. If your goal is to move into educational leadership or policy, you might consider the fastest online edd programs, which provide an accelerated path to advanced credentials.

Students seeking to enter the workforce quickly or enhance their qualifications in a short time may benefit from one year masters programs. These intensive courses cover essential subjects and open new professional opportunities without lengthy commitments.

Those ready to start or finish their undergraduate studies efficiently will find accelerated bachelor's degree programs especially appealing. These options allow learners to fast-track their education and begin their chosen careers sooner.

Best Scientists Citing David Feeny

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles