World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
20071
World Ranking
2354
National Ranking
258

Christine Eiser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Eiser sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 260 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Christine Eiser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Eiser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christine Eiser is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their academic work is situated within this institution, contributing to its research environment.

Details regarding specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications related to Christine Eiser are not available at this time.

Information about the main fields and subfields of study, as well as primary topics of research associated with Christine Eiser, has not been provided.

There are no records of awards or honors won by Christine Eiser in the provided data.

Best Publications

  • Can parents rate their child's health-related quality of life? Results of a systematic review.

    Christine Eiser;Rachel Morse

  • Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood

    C Eiser;R Morse

  • A review of measures of quality of life for children with chronic illness

    Christine Eiser;R Morse

  • Parent–child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: a review of the literature

    Penney Upton;Joanne Lawford;Christine Eiser

  • Factors influencing agreement between child self-report and parent proxy-reports on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales.

    Joanne Cremeens;Christine Eiser;Mark Blades

  • The measurement of quality of life in children: past and future perspectives.

    Christine Eiser;Rachel Morse

  • Health-related quality of life and symptom reporting: similarities and differences between children and their parents

    Christine Eiser;James W. Varni

  • Eating problems in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: a systematic review with meta‐analysis

    V Young;C Eiser;B Johnson;S Brierley

  • Psychological effects of chronic disease.

    Christine Eiser

  • Examining the Psychological Consequences of Surviving Childhood Cancer: Systematic Review as a Research Method in Pediatric Psychology

    Christine Eiser;Jacqueline J. Hill;Yvonne H. Vance

  • Quality of life in children newly diagnosed with cancer and their mothers

    Christine Eiser;J Richard Eiser;Christopher B Stride

  • Children's quality of life measures

    Christine Eiser

  • Measurement properties of the UK-English version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ 4.0 (PedsQL™) generic core scales

    Penney Upton;Christine Eiser;Ivy Cheung;Hayley A. Hutchings

  • The measurement of health-related quality of life (QOL) in paediatric clinical trials: a systematic review

    Sally-Ann Clarke;Christine Eiser

  • Developing strategies for long term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer

    W Hamish B Wallace;Annie Blacklay;Christine Eiser;Helena Davies

  • Intellectual abilities among survivors of childhood leukaemia as a function of CNS irradiation.

    Christine Eiser

  • Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM): self and parental perceptions.

    Efrosini Kalyva;Evlampia Malakonaki;Christine Eiser;Dimitrios Mamoulakis

  • Issues in Measuring Quality of Life in Childhood Cancer: Measures, Proxies, and Parental Mental Health

    Yvonne H. Vance;Rachel C. Morse;Meriel E. Jenney;Christine Eiser

  • Characteristics of health-related self-report measures for children aged three to eight years: A review of the literature

    Joanne Cremeens;Christine Eiser;Mark Blades

  • The measurement of quality of life in young children

    C Eiser;H Mohay;R Morse

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Richard Eiser
J. Richard Eiser University of Sheffield
Simon Heller
Simon Heller University of Sheffield
Richard J. Ross
Richard J. Ross University of Sheffield
Richard Rowe
Richard Rowe University of Sheffield
Robert E. Coleman
Robert E. Coleman University of Sheffield
Ronald D. Barr
Ronald D. Barr McMaster University
Mark A. Chesler
Mark A. Chesler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark Blades
Mark Blades University of Sheffield
Neil S. Coulson
Neil S. Coulson University of Nottingham
J. Richard Eiser
J. Richard Eiser University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in psychology, pursuing related fields such as social work can open a range of fulfilling career pathways. Social work degrees, especially those offered online, provide flexible learning options for students who want to balance their education with other commitments.

Choosing the right program is crucial. The top online social work degrees in America offer comprehensive curriculums that emphasize both theoretical knowledge and practical skills. If you are seeking local options, consider exploring the best online social work degrees in Waco for regionally-tailored programs.

Many universities across the country also offer standout programs within specific states. For example, the top social work degrees in Alabama and the top social work programs in Arkansas cater to students seeking either online or campus-based studies closer to home.

Social work and psychology go hand in hand, with both areas focusing on mental health, well-being, and community support. Graduates from these fields are well prepared for diverse roles in healthcare, counseling, education, and public service.

Best Scientists Citing Christine Eiser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles