World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Rosenbaum

Peter Rosenbaum

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
126
Citations
75440
World Ranking
2900
National Ranking
118

Peter Rosenbaum publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Rosenbaum sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 497 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Rosenbaum D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Rosenbaum sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 126 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Rosenbaum is affiliated with McMaster University in Canada and has established a body of research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their work notably intersects Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, General Health Professions, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

Rosenbaum has contributed to a number of recent publications, including:

  • Let's not go back to 'normal'! lessons from COVID-19 for professionals working in childhood disability, 2020, Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Proposed updated description of cerebral palsy, 2025, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
  • Propensity scores in the design of observational studies for causal effects, 2022, Biometrika
  • Physical therapy in children with cerebral palsy in Brazil: a scoping review, 2021, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
  • Study protocol: functioning curves and trajectories for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy in Brazil - PartiCipa Brazil, 2020, BMC Pediatrics

Frequent co-authors in Rosenbaum's work include:

  • Hércules Ribeiro Leite
  • Briano Di Rezze
  • Kinga Pozniak
  • Paula Silva de Carvalho Chagas
  • Monika Novak-Pavlic

Their publications are often featured in the following venues:

  • Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
  • Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Child Care Health and Development
  • Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Best Publications

  • Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy

    Robert Palisano;Peter Rosenbaum;Stephen Walter;Dianne Russell

  • A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006.

    Peter Rosenbaum;Nigel Paneth;Alan Leviton;Maurice Goldstein

  • Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005.

    Martin Bax;Murray Goldstein;Peter Rosenbaum;Alan Leviton

  • The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability

    Ann-Christin Eliasson;Lena Krumlinde-Sundholm;Birgit Rösblad;Eva Beckung

  • Content validity of the expanded and revised Gross Motor Function Classification System.

    Robert J. Palisano;Peter Rosenbaum;Doreen J. Bartlett;Michael H. Livingston

  • The Health and Well-Being of Caregivers of Children With Cerebral Palsy

    Parminder Raina;Maureen O'Donnell;Peter Rosenbaum;Jamie Brehaut

  • Prognosis for Gross Motor Function in cerebral palsy: Creation of Motor development curves

    Peter L. Rosenbaum;Stephen D. Walter;Steven E. Hanna;Robert J. Palisano

  • The gross motor function measure: a means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy.

    Dianne J. Russell;Peter L. Rosenbaum;David T. Cadman;Carolyn Gowland

  • Validation of a Model of Gross Motor Function for Children With Cerebral Palsy

    Robert J Palisano;Steven E Hanna;Peter L Rosenbaum;Dianne J Russell

  • Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy

    Mary Jo Cooley Hidecker;Nigel Paneth;Peter L Rosenbaum;Raymond D Kent

  • The Gross Motor Function Classification System for Cerebral Palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time

    Ellen Wood;Peter Rosenbaum

  • A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities.

    Gillian King;Mary C. Law;Susanne King;Peter Rosenbaum

  • Improved Scaling of the Gross Motor Function Measure for Children With Cerebral Palsy: Evidence of Reliability and Validity

    Dianne J Russell;Lisa M Avery;Peter L Rosenbaum;Parminder S Raina

  • Family-Centred Service

    Peter Rosenbaum;Susanne King;Mary Law;Gillian King

  • The health of primary caregivers of children with cerebral palsy: how does it compare with that of other Canadian caregivers?

    Jamie C Brehaut;Dafna E Kohen;Dafna E Kohen;Parminder Raina;Stephen D Walter

  • Caregiving process and caregiver burden: Conceptual models to guide research and practice

    Parminder Raina;Maureen O'Donnell;Heidi Schwellnus;Peter Rosenbaum

  • Patterns of participation in recreational and leisure activities among children with complex physical disabilities

    Mary Law;Gillian King;Susanne King;Marilyn Kertoy

  • Family-centered caregiving and well-being of parents of children with disabilities:linking process with outcome

    Gillian King;Susanne King;Peter Rosenbaum;Richard Goffin

  • Development of the Gross Motor Function Classification System for cerebral palsy.

    Peter L. Rosenbaum;Robert J. Palisano;Doreen J. Bartlett;Barbara E. Galuppi

  • Cognitive abilities and school performance of extremely low birth weight children and matched term control children at age 8 years: a regional study

    Saroj Saigal;Peter Szatmari;Peter Szatmari;Peter Rosenbaum;Peter Rosenbaum;Dugal Campbell;Dugal Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary Law
Mary Law McMaster University
Saroj Saigal
Saroj Saigal McMaster University
David L. Streiner
David L. Streiner University of Toronto
Stephen D. Walter
Stephen D. Walter McMaster University
Gillian King
Gillian King Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Jan Willem Gorter
Jan Willem Gorter McMaster University
Susanne King
Susanne King McMaster University
Lucyna M. Lach
Lucyna M. Lach McGill University
Annette Majnemer
Annette Majnemer McGill University
Michael Shevell
Michael Shevell McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine isn't limited to a traditional medical degree. Many students look for flexible, online alternatives to expand their career options or further their qualifications. For nurses aiming to become family nurse practitioners, adn to fnp bridge programs offer a streamlined pathway to advanced practice roles without starting from scratch.

If you’re interested in nutrition and wellness, an online bachelor's in nutrition provides foundational knowledge and opens doors to careers in dietetics, health coaching, or public health.

Healthcare management is another fast-growing field. Those seeking leadership roles might consider cahme accredited mha online programs, which are recognized for their quality and prepare graduates for administrative careers in hospitals, clinics, or healthcare systems.

Additionally, current registered nurses looking to quickly advance their qualifications can enroll in rn to bsn online programs without clinicals, which offer a flexible route to earning a bachelor’s degree from home. Exploring these online pathways can help you find the right option to match both your professional goals and lifestyle needs.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Rosenbaum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles