World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 110 386 338 246 212 407 85200

Baruch Fischhoff publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Baruch Fischhoff between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Baruch Fischhoff published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2001. 23 of the 571 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2001. 1974: 2 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 8 publications 1977: 16 publications 1978: 10 publications 1979: 8 publications 1980: 10 publications 1981: 11 publications 1982: 10 publications 1983: 16 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 34 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 15 publications
1974 2025

571 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Baruch Fischhoff: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 2
1975 4
1976 8
1977 16
1978 10
1979 8
1980 10
1981 11
1982 10
1983 16
1984 8
1985 9
1986 8
1987 7
1988 8
1989 5
1990 5
1991 6
1992 8
1993 11
1994 6
1995 3
1996 3
1997 8
1998 6
1999 13
2000 20
2001 34
2002 13
2003 17
2004 3
2005 16
2006 9
2007 13
2008 6
2009 6
2010 15
2011 15
2012 17
2013 16
2014 12
2015 15
2016 14
2017 16
2018 13
2019 23
2020 11
2021 12
2022 9
2023 14
2024 8
2025 15
Total 571
Download as CSV

Baruch Fischhoff publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baruch Fischhoff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–410 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 407 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43 407
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Baruch Fischhoff D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Baruch Fischhoff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35 110
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Andrew Carnegie Fellow
  • 2017 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • 1993 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Baruch Fischhoff is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States, focusing primarily on medicine with particular expertise in emergency medicine, sociology and political science, general health professions, family practice, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their research is reflected in a diverse range of topics including decision-making and behavioral economics, emergency and acute care studies, clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, misinformation and its impacts, climate change communication and perception, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, and palliative care and end-of-life issues.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Jonathan Elmer, Tamar Krishnamurti, Alexis Steinberg, Deepika Mohan, and Douglas B. White.

Key publication venues where Fischhoff has contributed multiple works include JAMA Network Open, Resuscitation, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Risk Analysis, and the Journal of Perinatology.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Fischhoff are:

  • Making Decisions in a COVID-19 World, 2020, JAMA
  • Decision-Making Competence: More Than Intelligence?, 2020, Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • Risk perceptions and health behaviors as COVID-19 emerged in the United States: Results from a probability-based nationally representative sample., 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied
  • Assessing How Consumers Interpret and Act on Results From At-Home COVID-19 Self-test Kits, 2022, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Making behavioral science integral to climate science and action, 2020, Behavioural Public Policy

Throughout their career, Fischhoff has received several recognitions including being named an Andrew Carnegie Fellow in 2018, election to the National Academy of Sciences in 2017, fellowship of the American Psychological Association in 2002, and membership in the National Academy of Medicine in 1993.

Best Publications

  • The psychometric study of risk perception

    Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Baruch Fischhoff

  • HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH? A PSYCHOMETRIC STUDY OF ATTITUDES TOWARDS TECHNOLOGICAL RISKS AND BENEFITS

    Baruch Fischhoff;Paul Slovic;Sarah Lichtenstein;Stephen Read

  • Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.

    Baruch Fischhoff

  • Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Baruch Fischhoff;Lawrence D. Phillips

  • Behavioral Decision Theory

    Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Judged frequency of lethal events

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Mark Layman

  • Knowing with Certainty: The Appropriateness of Extreme Confidence.

    Baruch Fischhoff;Paul Slovic;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Reasons for confidence.

    Asher Koriat;Sarah Lichtenstein;Baruch Fischhoff

  • Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach

    M. Granger Morgan;Baruch Fischhoff;Ann Bostrom;Cynthia J. Atman

  • Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism A National Field Experiment

    Jennifer S. Lerner;Roxana M. Gonzalez;Deborah A. Small;Baruch Fischhoff

  • Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process.

    Baruch Fischhoff

  • Rating the Risks

    Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Do Those Who Know More Also Know More about How Much They Know

    Sarah Lichtenstein;Baruch Fischhoff

  • Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.

    Wändi Bruine de Bruin;Andrew M. Parker;Baruch Fischhoff

  • Hindsight/Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty

    Baruch Fischhoff

  • I knew it would happen: Remembered probabilities of once—future things

    Baruch Fischhoff;Ruth Beyth

  • Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk

    Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • Why Study Risk Perception

    Paul Slovic;Baruch Fischhoff;Sarah Lichtenstein

  • What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models

    Ann Bostrom;M. Granger Morgan;Baruch Fischhoff;Daniel Read

  • Clinical Decision Analysis

    Baruch Fischhoff

Frequent Co-Authors

Wändi Bruine de Bruin
Wändi Bruine de Bruin University of Southern California
Sarah Lichtenstein
Sarah Lichtenstein Oregon Research Institute
Paul Slovic
Paul Slovic University of Oregon
M. Granger Morgan
M. Granger Morgan Carnegie Mellon University
Cynthia J. Atman
Cynthia J. Atman University of Washington
Julie S. Downs
Julie S. Downs Carnegie Mellon University
Andrew M. Parker
Andrew M. Parker RAND Corporation
Ann Bostrom
Ann Bostrom University of Washington
Derek C. Angus
Derek C. Angus University of Pittsburgh
Mitchell J. Small
Mitchell J. Small Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and related degrees opens up a wide range of flexible learning and career opportunities. Many students now look for options that are both accessible and affordable, making a best budget-friendly online psychology programs list an essential resource for cost-conscious learners.

If you’re considering broader social sciences, a cheapest online sociology degree can be a smart starting point for roles in counseling, human resources, and community advocacy.

Those interested in clinical work can pursue a clinical psychology online degree. Programs like these train students for therapist and counselor positions in mental health settings, often including practicum or supervised experience components.

For advanced career pathways in research, academia, or specialized clinical practice, an online phd in psychology offers a route to the highest qualifications in the field. These programs require significant commitment but open doors to leadership and research roles within academia, healthcare, and industry.

Best Scientists Citing Baruch Fischhoff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles